No Such Thing as Too Many Minds

References

• Basile, Pierfrancesco 2010. It Must Be True—But How Can It Be? Some Remarks on Panpsychism and Mental Composition, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 67: 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmon, James 2016. Hemispherectomies and Independently Conscious Brain Regions, Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3/4: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmon, James 2021. Integrated Information Theory, Intrinsicality, and Overlapping Conscious Systems, Journal of Consciousness Studies 28/11–12: 31–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David 2003. The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief, in Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, eds Q. Smith and A. Jokic, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 220-272.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, Paul 1981. Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes, Journal of Philosophy 78/2: 67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, Tom 2021. A Case of Shared Consciousness, Synthese 199/1–2: 1019–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, Sam 2014. The Real Combination Problem: Panpsychism, Micro-Subjects, and Emergence, Erkenntnis 79/1: 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominus, Susan 2011. Could Conjoined Twins Share a Mind? New York Times Magazine, May 29.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, Philip 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, Philip and Luke Roelofs forthcoming. In Defence of Phenomenal Sharing, in The Phenomenology of Self-Awareness and Conscious Subjects, eds Julien Bugnon, Martine Nida-Rümelin, and Donnchadh O’Conaill, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirstein, William 2008. Mindmelding: Connected Brains and the Problem of Consciousness, Mens Sana Monographs, 6/1: 110–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, Mark 1992. How to speak of the colours, Philosophical Studies 68/3: 221–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Mark 2017a. The Personite Problem: Should Practical Reason be Tabled?, Noûs 51/3: 617–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Mark 2017b. Personites, Maximality, and Ontological Trash, Philosophical Perspectives 30/1: 198–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Mark 2021. The Subject and its Apparatus: are they Ontological Trash? Philosophical Studies 178/8: 2731–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, François 2015. How a Materialist Can Deny That the United States is Probably Conscious–Response to Schwitzgebel, Philosophia 43/4: 1047–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langland-Hassan, Peter 2015. Introspective Misidentification, Philosophical Studies 172/7: 1737–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David 1976. Survival and Identity, in The Identities of Persons, ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David 1993. Many, but Almost One, in Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong, eds J. Bacon, K. Campbell, and L. Reinhardt, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• López de Sa, Dan 2014. Lewis vs Lewis on the Problem of the Many, Synthese 191/6: 1105–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merricks, Trenton 2001. Objects and Persons, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, Hedda Hassel 2014. Panpsychism and Causation: a New Argument and a Solution to the Combination Problem, PhD thesis, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, Hedda Hassel 2019. Is Consciousness Intrinsic? A Problem for the Integrated Information Theory, Journal of Consciousness Studies 26/1–2: 133–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan, Harold 2003. Personal Identity, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Eric 2003. An Argument for Animalism, in Personal Identity, eds R. Martin and J. Barresi, Malden, MA: Blackwell: 318–35.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, L. A. 2002. Logical Parts, Noûs 36/4: 578–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, L. A. 2006. Coincidence as Overlap, Noûs 40/4: 623–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, Y., D. Neville, M. Otten, P. Corballis, V. Lamme, E. de Haan, N. Foschi, and M. Fabri 2017. Split Brain: Divided Perception but Undivided Consciousness, Brain: A Journal of Neurology 140/5: 1231–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary 1965/2003. The Nature of Mental States, in Philosophy of Mind: Contemporary Readings, eds T. O’Connor, D. Robb, and J. Heil, London: Routledge: 210–21.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, Luke 2016. The Unity of Consciousness, Within and Between Subjects, Philosophical Studies 173/12: 3199–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, Luke 2019. Combining Minds: How to Think About Composite Subjectivity, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovane, Carol 1998. The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, Elizabeth 2014. Partial Unity of Consciousness: A Preliminary Defense, in Sensory integration and the unity of consciousness, eds D. Bennett, D. J. Bennett, and C. Hill, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 347–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, Elizabeth 2015. The Subject in Neuropsychology: Individuating Minds in the Split-Brain Case, Mind and Language 30/5: 501–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, Elizabeth 2018. Self-Consciousness and ‘Split’ Brains: The Minds’ I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric 2015. If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious. Philosophical Studies 172/7: 1697–1721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric 2021. Review of Combining Minds: How to Think About Composite Subjectivity, Notre Dame Philosophy Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/combining-minds-how-to-think-about-composite-subjectivity/
   Google Scholar
• Seager, William 2010. Panpsychism, Aggregation and Combinatorial Infusion, Mind and Matter 8/2: 167–184.
   Google Scholar
• Seager, William 2017. Panpsychist Infusion, in Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, eds G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 229–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore 2003. Maximality and Microphysical Supervenience, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66/1: 139–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Jonathan 2017. The Hard Problem of the Many, Philosophical Perspectives 31/1: 449–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Daniel 2006. Ignorance and Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Galen 2015. Self-Intimation, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14/1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, C.S. 2014. The Supervenience Solution to the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem, Philosophical Quarterly 64/257: 619–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, C.S. 2015. Almost One, Overlap and Function, Analysis 75/1: 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tononi, Giulio 2012. Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness: An Updated Account, Archives Italiennes de Biologie 150/2–3: 56–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tononi Giulio, and Christoph Koch 2015. Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370/20140167: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, Peter 1979. Why There are No People, Midwest Studies In Philosophy 4/1: 177–222.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, Peter 1980. The Problem of the Many, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5/1: 411–68.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, Peter 2004. Mental Problems of the Many, in Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Volume 1, ed. Dean W. Zimmerman, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 195–222.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherson, Brian 2003. Many Many Problems, Philosophical Quarterly, 53/213: 481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Dean W. 2005. Material People, in Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds Michael J. Loux and Dean W. Zimmerman, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 491–526.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Dean W. 2010. From Property Dualism to Substance Dualism, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84/1: 119–50.
   Google Scholar