On Scepticism About Ought Simpliciter

References

• Baker, Derek (2018) ‘Skepticism About Ought Simpliciter’, in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13: 230–52. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, James L D (2022) ‘Conceptual Role Expressivism and Defective Concepts’, in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 18: 225–53. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, Matthew (2016) The Meaning of ‘Ought’. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cocking, Dean and Jeanette Kennett (2000) ‘Friendship and Moral Danger’, Journal of Philosophy 97: 278–96. doi:10.2307/2678396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, David (2007) ‘The Ring of Gyges: Overridingness and the Unity of Reason’, in Morality in a Natural World. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, David (2009) ‘Toward a Pluralist and Teleological Theory of Normativity’, Philosophical Issues 19: 21–37. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2009.00157.x.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, David (2021) ‘Normative Pluralism and Skepticism About ‘Ought Simpliciter’’, in Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason: 416–37. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Roger (1996) ‘The Dualism of Practical Reason’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 53–74. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.53.
   Google Scholar
• Darwall, Stephen (2013) ‘Morality’s Distinctiveness’, in Morality, Authority, and Law: 3–19. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsey, Dale (2013) ‘Two Dualisms of Practical Reason’ in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 8: 114–39. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsey, Dale (2016) ‘Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry’, Ethics 126: 747–73. doi:10.1086/684710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Elizabeth (2021) ‘There is No Moral Ought and No Prudential Ought’, in Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason: 438–56. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Killoren, David (2019) ‘Infinitism About Cross-Domain Conflict’, in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14: 144–66. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, Owen (2001) ‘Just Plain “Ought”’, Journal of Ethics 5: 269–91. doi:10.1023/A:1013934513554.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram (2018) ‘Authoritatively Normative Concepts’, in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13: 253–77. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha (1986) The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, Michael (2014) Impassioned Belief. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, Karl (2016) ‘The Modesty of the Moral Point of View’, in Errol Lord and Barry Maguire, eds., Weighing Reasons: 241–56. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter (1962) ‘Freedom and Resentment’, Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 187–211.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, Sarah (1998) ‘Moral Overridingness and Moral Theory’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 170–89. doi:10.1111/1468-0114.00056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sud, Rohan (2019) ‘Moral Vagueness as Semantic Vagueness’, Ethics 129: 684–705. doi:10.1086/702976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffany, Evan (2007) ‘Deflationary Normative Pluralism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37: 231–62. doi:10.1353/cjp.0.0076.
   Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, Ralph (2007) The Nature of Normativity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J Robert G (2018) ‘Normative Reference Magnets’, Philosophical Review 127: 41–71. doi:10.1215/00318108-4230057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, Daniel (2019) ‘Mere Formalities: Fictional Normativity and Normative Authority’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49: 828–50. doi:10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan (2015) ‘Morality and Partiality’, in The Variety of Values: 31-46. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Jack (2018) ‘The Authority of Formality’, in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13: 230–52. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar