652
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion Notes

Well-Being Measurements and the Linearity Assumption: A Response to Wodak

Pages 512-518 | Received 18 Oct 2021, Accepted 13 Sep 2022, Published online: 03 Jul 2023

References

  • Briggs, Derek (2022) Historical and Conceptual Foundations of Measurement in the Human Sciences. Routledge.
  • Crisp, Roger (2003) ‘Equality, Priority, and Compassion’, Ethics 113: 745–63. doi:10.1086/373954.
  • Easterlin, Richard (1974) ‘Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?’, in Paul David and Melvin Reder, eds., Nations and Households in Economic Growth: 89–125. Academic Press.
  • Frijters, Paul, and Christian Krekel (2021) A Handbook for Wellbeing Policy-Making. Oxford University Press.
  • Gelfand, Stanley (2009) Hearing: An Introduction to Psychological and Physiological Acoustics, 5th edition. Informa Healthcare.
  • Kahneman, Daniel (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Larroulet Philippi, Cristian (2021) ‘On Measurement Scales: Neither Ordinal nor Interval?’, Philosophy of Science 88: 929-39. doi:10.1086/714873.
  • Larroulet Philippi, Cristian (forthcoming) ‘Against Prohibition (Or, When Using Ordinal Scales to Compare Groups is OK)’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1086/721759.
  • Poulton, E. C. (1979) ‘Models for the Biases in Judging Sensory Magnitude’ Psychological Bulletin 86: 777–803. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.777.
  • Wodak, Daniel (2019) ‘What If Well-Being Measurements Are Non-Linear?’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97: 29–45. doi:10.1080/00048402.2018.1454483.