Advanced search
Publication Cover
Australasian Journal of Philosophy Volume 102, 2024 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
651
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Russellian Monism and Ignorance of Non-structural Properties

Justin MendelowORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-3224View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 372-388 | Received 27 Jul 2020, Accepted 05 Apr 2023, Published online: 16 Aug 2023

References

  • Alter, T (2016) ‘The Structure and Dynamics Argument against Materialism’, Noûs 50: 794–815. doi: 10.1111/nous.12134.
  • Alter, T and Nagasawa, Y (2012) ‘What is Russellian Monism?’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 19: 67–95.
  • Chalmers, D (1996) The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.
  • Chalmers, D (2002) ‘Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?’, in T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, eds., Conceivability and Possibility: 145–200. Oxford University Press.
  • Chalmers, D (2017) ‘Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism’, in G. Bruntrup and L. Jaskolla, eds., Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives: 19–47. Oxford University Press.
  • Cutter, B (2019) ‘Against the Middle Ground: Why Russellian Monism Is Unstable’, Analytic Philosophy 60: 109–29. doi: 10.1111/phib.12149.
  • Goff, P (2017) Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford University Press.
  • Langton, R and Lewis, D (1998) ‘Defining ‘Intrinsic'’, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 58: 333–45. doi: 10.2307/2025310.
  • Leibniz, G.W (1702/1969) Philosophical Papers and Letters. L.E. Loemker, ed. D. Reidel.
  • Lewis, D (1980) ‘Mad Pain and Martian Pain’, in N. Block, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology: Volume 1: 216–22. Harvard University Press.
  • Pereboom, D (2011) Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
  • Pereboom, D (2013) ‘Russellian Monism and Absolutely Intrinsic Properties’, in U. Kriegel, ed., Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind: 40–70. Routledge.
  • Pereboom, D (2015) ‘Consciousness, Physicalism and Absolutely Intrinsic Properties’, in T. Alter and Y. Nagasawa, eds., Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism: 300–24. Oxford University Press.
  • Pereboom, D (2019) ‘Russellian Monism, Introspective Inaccuracy, and the Illusion Meta-Problem of Consciousness’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26: 182–93.
  • Roelofs, L (2019) Combining Minds: How to Think about Composite Subjectivity. Oxford University Press.
  • Russell, B (1927) The Analysis of Matter. Kegan Paul.
  • Seager, W (2006) ‘The ‘Intrinsic Nature’ Argument for Panpsychism’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 13: 129–45.
  • Seager, W (2017) ‘Panpsychist Infusion’, in G. Bruntrup and L. Jaskolla, eds., Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives: 229–49. Oxford University Press.
  • Skow, B (2007) ‘Are Shapes Intrinsic?’, Philosophical Studies 133: 111–30. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9009-4.
  • Stoljar, D (2001) ‘Two Conceptions of the Physical’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 253–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00056.x.
  • Yablo, S (1993) ‘Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 1–42. doi: 10.2307/2108052.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.