The Grounds of a Critique of Pure Reason

References

• Adams, Robert (1994) Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, Lucy (2015) Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Henry (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, Revised and Enlarged Edition. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. Lanier (2015) The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, Alexander (1757) Metaphysica, 4th ed. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Callanan, John (2021) ‘The Boundary of Pure Reason’, in Peter Thielke, ed., Cambridge Guide to Kant’s Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: 133–53. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Shamik (2018) ‘Realism and the Absence of Value’, Philosophical Review 127: 279–322. doi:10.1215/00318108-6718771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreier, Jamie (2015) ‘Can Reasons Fundamentalism Answer the Normative Question?’, in Gunnar Bjornsson, Caj Strandberg, Ragnar Francen Olinder, John Eriksson, and Fredrik Bjorklund, eds., Motivational Internalism: 167–81. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David (2006) ‘Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What Is Constitutive of Action’, Philosophical Review 115: 169–98. doi:10.1215/115-2-169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grier, Michelle (2001). Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, Desmond (2009) ‘Three Kinds of Rationalism and the Non-Spatiality of Things in Themselves’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 47: 355–82. doi:10.1353/hph.0.0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Stephen (2022) ‘Kant on Limits, Boundaries, and the Positive Function of Ideas’ European Journal of Philosophy 30: 64–78. doi:10.1111/ejop.12652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel (1900—) Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin-Brandenburg (formerly Royal Prussian) Academy of Sciences, ed. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy, Mary Gregor, ed./trans. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel (1997) Lectures on Metaphysics, Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon, eds./trans. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, P. Guyer and A. Wood, eds./trans. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kment, Boris (2014) Modality and Explanatory Reasoning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine (1989) ‘Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18: 101–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, Rae (1998) Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things-in-themselves. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longuenesse, Béatrice (2005) Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, John (2000) What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal? Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora (1989) ‘Reason and Politics in the Kantian Enterprise’, in Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy: 3–27. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, Graham, Koji Tanaka, and Zach Weber (2018) ‘Paraconsistent Logic’ in Edward N. Zalta ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
   Google Scholar
• Proops, Ian (2010) ‘Kant’s First Paralogism’, Philosophical Review 119: 449–95. doi:10.1215/00318108-2010-011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauscher, Frederick (1998) ‘Kant’s Two Priorities of Practical Reason’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6: 397–419. doi:10.1080/09608789808571004.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John (1975) ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5–22. doi:10.2307/3129858.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Gideon (2017) ‘Ground by Laws, Philosophical Issues 27: 302–21. doi:10.1111/phis.12105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, Karl. (2023). Kant's Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, Karl (2019) ‘Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy’, Philosophical Explorations 22: 177–93. doi:10.1080/13869795.2019.1599049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Jonathan (2017) ‘Laws for Metaphysical Explanation’, Philosophical Issues 27: 302–21. doi:10.1017/s1358246118000164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore (2022). 'Dasgupta's Detonation', Philosophical Perspectives 36: 292–304. doi:10.1111/phpe.12169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, Houston (2009) ‘Kant on A priority and the Spontaneity of Cognition’, in Samuel Newlands and Larry M. Jorgensen, eds., Metaphysics and the Good: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams: 188–251. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, Nicholas (2016) Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, Nicholas (2019) ‘A Guide to Ground in Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics’, in Courtney Fugate, ed., Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide: 74–101. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P.F. (1966) The Bounds of Sense. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Tolley, Clinton (2006) ‘Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws', Philosophical Topics 34 (1–2): 371–407. doi:10.5840/philtopics2006341/214
   Google Scholar
• Tolley, Clinton (2020) ‘Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of our Representations’, Synthese 197: 3215–44. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1625-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, Eric (2005) Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Eric (2014) ‘Hegel’s Critique of Kant in the Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit’, in Mario Egger, ed., Philosophie Nach Kant: Neue Wege Zum Verständnis von Kants Transzendental- Und Moralphilosophie: 547–70. De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Eric (2019) ‘What Real Progress has Metaphysics Made Since the Time of Kant? Kant and the Metaphysics of Grounding’, Synthese 198: 3213–29. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02180-2.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Eric and Marcus Willaschek (2017) ‘Kant’s Account of Cognition’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 83–112. doi:10.1353/hph.2017.0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willaschek, Marcus (2018) Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsch, Tobias (2015) ‘The Nomological Account of Ground’, Philosophical Studies 172: 3293–312. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0470-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian (1730) Philosophia Prima, sive Ontologia [Ontologia]. Frankfurt and Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James (2021) ‘Scientific Explanation’, in Edward N. Zalta ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/scientific-explanation/.
   Google Scholar