Perspective and spatial experience

References

• Beck, Ori (2019) ‘Rethinking Naive Realism’, Philosophical Studies 176: 607–33. doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1030-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Ned (2003) ‘Mental Paint’, in Martin Hahn and Björn Ramberg, eds., Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge: 165–200. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, Edwin G (1952) ‘Visual Perception as Invariance’, Psychological Review 59: 141–48. doi:10.1037/h0060819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, John (1994) Past, Space, and Self. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, John (2002) Reference and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David (2006) ‘Perception and the Fall from Eden’, in Tamar Gendler and John Hawthorne, eds., Perceptual Experience: 49–125. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Allen and Robert Vickerstaff (2010) ‘Finding the Way with a Noisy Brain’, PLoS Computational Biology 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Austen (1996) ‘Three Varieties of Visual Field’, Philosophical Psychology 9: 477–95. doi:10.1080/09515089608573196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, Marcello and Patrick Haggard (2007) ‘The Rubber Hand Illusion: Sensitivity and Reference Frame for Body Ownership’, Consciousness and Cognition 16: 229–40. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, James and Peter Vishton (1995) ‘Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth’, in Handbook of Perception and Cognition, vol. 5: 69–117. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, Craig and Ian Phillips (2020) ‘Austerity and Illusion’, Philosophers’ Imprint 20: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallistel, Charles R (1990) The Organization of Learning. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J (1952) ‘The Visual Field and the Visual World: A Reply to Professor Boring’, Psychological Review 59: 149–51. doi:10.1037/h0059018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, Alan (2012) ‘Subjective and Objective Sides of Perception’, in Gary Hatfield and Sarah Allred, eds., Visual Experience: 105–21. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E J and Susanna Schellenberg (2018) ‘Spatial Perception: The Perspectival Aspect of Perception’, Philosophy Compass 13. doi:10.1111/phc3.12472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, Gil (1990) ‘The Intrinsic Quality of Experience’, Philosophical Perspectives 4: 31–52. doi:10.2307/2214186.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary (2003) ‘Representation and Constraints: The Inverse Problem and the Structure of Visual Space’, Acta Psychologica 114: 355–78. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary (2009) Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary (2011) ‘Philosophy of Perception and the Phenomenology of Visual Space’, Philosophic Exchange 42: 31–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary (2012) ‘Phenomenal and Cognitive Factors in Space Perception’, in Gary Hatfield and Sarah Allred, eds., Visual Experience: 35–62. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, Ben and Assaf Weksler (forthcoming) ‘(Un)conscious Perspectival Shape and Attention Guidance in Visual Search: A Reply to Morales, Bax, and Firestone (2020)’, in Juraj Hvorecký Tomáš Marvan and Michal Polák, eds., Conscious and Unconscious States and Processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hershenson, Maurice (1999) Visual Space Perception: A Primer. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Christopher S and David J Bennett (2008) ‘The Perception of Size and Shape’, Philosophical Issues 18: 294–315. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2008.00149.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Robert (2000) ‘Touching Pictures’, British Journal of Aesthetics 40: 149–67. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.1.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagnow, René (2012) ‘Representationalism and the Perspectival Character of Perceptual Experience’, Philosophical Studies 157: 227–49. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9634-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joynson, Robert (1958) ‘An Experimental Synthesis of the Associationist and Gestalt Accounts of Size’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10: 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Alex (2021) Ways of Perceiving. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Lande, Kevin J (2018) ‘The Perspectival Character of Perception’, Journal of Philosophy 115: 187–214. doi:10.5840/jphil2018115413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthen, Mohan (2005) Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, Jorge, Axel Bax, and Chaz Firestone (2020) ‘Sustained Representation of Perspectival Shape’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117: 14873–82. doi:10.1073/pnas.2000715117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Scott O, Huseyin Boyaci, and Daniel Kersten (2006) ‘The Representation of Perceived Angular Size in Human Primary Visual Cortex’, Nature Neuroscience 9: 429–34. doi:10.1038/nn1641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noë, Alva (2004) Action in Perception. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Stephen (1978) ‘Fundamental Aspects of Cognitive Representation’, in Eleanor Rosch and Barbara Lloyd, eds., Cognition and Categorization: 259–303. Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Stephen (1999) Vision Science. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, Erwin (1996) Perspective as Symbolic Form. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, Adam (2010) ‘Why Explain Visual Experience in Terms of Content?’, in Bence Nanay, ed., Perceiving the World: 254–309. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, Adam (forthcoming) ‘Naive Realism and the Science of Consciousness’, Analytic Philosophy. https://philarchive.org/rec/PAUNRA-2
   Google Scholar
• Peacocke, Christopher (1983) Sense and Content. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perdreau, Florian and Patrick Cavanagh (2011) ‘Do Artists See Their Retinas?’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 171. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn, Jake (2020) ‘Perceptual Pluralism’, Noûs 54: 807–38. doi:10.1111/nous.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, Michael (2018) ‘Maps in the Head?’, in Kristin Andrews and Jacob Beck, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds: 34–45. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, Susanna (2008) ‘The Situation-Dependency of Perception’, Journal of Philosophy 105: 55–84. doi:10.5840/jphil200810525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric (2006) ‘Do Things Look Flat?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72: 589–99. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00585.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, Eric (2011) Perplexities of Consciousness. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speaks, Jeff (2015) The Phenomenal and the Representational. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thouless, Robert H (1931) ‘Phenomenal Regression to the Real Object’, British Journal of Psychology 21: 339–59. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1931.tb00597.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael (1991) The Imagery Debate. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael (1996) ‘Perceptual Experience Is a Many-Layered Thing’, Philosophical Issues 7: 117–26. doi:10.2307/1522897.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael (2000) Consciousness, Color, and Content. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael (2002) ‘Visual Qualia and Visual Content Revisited’, in David J Chalmers, ed., Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitruvius (1914) The Ten Books on Architecture, Morris Morgan, trans. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Mark (2006) The Geometries of Visual Space. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, Gizem Y, Irene Sperandio Christine Kettle, and Philippe A Chouinard (2022) ‘A Review on Various Explanations of Ponzo-Like Illusions’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 29: 293–320. doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02007-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar