Mechanical fuel load reduction in Australia: a potential tool for bushfire mitigation

References

• Absher J, Vaske J. 2007. Chapter 9: modelling public support for wildland fire policy. In: Reynolds K, Thomson A, Shannon M, Kohl M, Ray D and Rennolls K, editors. Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. Wallingford (UK): CAB International Press. p. 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Allen Consulting Group. 2005. Climate change risk and vulnerability: promoting an efficient adaptation response in Australia. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage. Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office.
   Google Scholar
• Altangerel K, Kull CA. 2013. The prescribed burning debate in Australia: conflicts and compatibilities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 56(1):103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arno SF, Brown JK. 1989. Managing fire in our forests – time for a new initiative. Journal of Forestry. 87:44–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnosti D, Abbas D, Current D, Demchik M. 2008. Harvesting fuel: cutting costs and reducing forest fire hazards through biomass harvest. Minneapolis (MN): Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. USDA Forest Service report.
   Google Scholar
• Barr R, Wright W, Rayment P. 2011. Thinning, fire and birds in Boola Boola State Forest, Victoria, Australia. Australian Forestry. 74:43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell T, Oliveras I. 2006. Perceptions of prescribed burning in a local forest community in Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management 38:867–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard B 2003. Community perceptions of wildland fire risk and fire hazard reduction strategies at the wildland-urban interface in the Northeastern United States [ Masters thesis]. [Amherst (MA)]: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard B, Ryan RL. 2007. Managing the wildland–urban interface in the northeast: perceptions of fire risk and hazard reduction strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 24:203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bright AD, Newman P. 2006. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Newton Square (PA): US Department of Agriculture. General Technical Report NRS-1. Available from: https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brooks ML, Deuser C, Matchett JR, Smith H, Bastian H. 2006. Effects of fuel management treatments in Piñon Juniper vegetation at a site on the Colorado Plateau. Boise (ID): Joint Fire Science Program. National Interagency Fire Center, Project Number 03-3-3-58 ID 83705-5354.
   Google Scholar
• Brunson MW, Evans J. 2005. Badly burned? Effects of an escaped prescribed burn on social acceptability of wildland fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry. 103:134–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunson MW, Shindler BR. 2004. Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society and Natural Resources. 17:661–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunson MW, Toman E, Shindler B. 2006. Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluation of agency outreach activities. Society and Natural Resources. 19:321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll J, Bright A. 2010. Integrative complexity of public beliefs toward wildfire management: development of a scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40:344–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Cohn PJ, Morgan T. 2007. Managing fire danger in the forests of the US inland northwest: a classic ‘Wicked Problem’ in public land policy. Journal of Forestry. 105:239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling PC. 1991. Ecological effects of prescribed burning practices on the mammals of southeastern Australia. In: Lunney D, editor. Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 49–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR. 2012. Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 280:120–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MF. 2008. Catering for the needs of fauna in fire management: science or just wishful thinking? Wildlife Research. 35:385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Countryman CM. 1972. The concept of the fire environment. Fire Control Notes. 27:8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Craig MD, Hobbs RJ, Grigg AH, Garkaklis MJ, Grant CD, Fleming PA, Hardy GESJ. 2010. Do thinning and burning sites revegetated after bauxite mining improve habitat for terrestrial vertebrates? Restoration Ecology. 18:300–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CRC] Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre. 2007. Tree decline in the absence of fire: research is looking at the link between dieback in eucalypt forests and fire regimes. Fire Note Issue 13. Melbourne (Australia): Bushfire CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz MG, Gould JS, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, McCaw WL, Matthews S. 2015. Empirical-based models for predicting head-fire rate of spread in Australian fuel types. Australian Forestry. 78:118–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics. 2014. Scoping study on a cost benefit analysis of bushfire mitigation. A report prepared for the Australian Forest Products Association. Available from: http://ausfpa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/AFPA-DAE-report-Amended-Final-2014-05-27.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment and Energy. 2015. Climate change activity tables. Available from: http://ageis.climatechange.gov.au/QueryAppendixTable.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll DA, Bode M, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Penman TD, Price OF. 2015. Resolving future fire management conflicts using multicriteria decision making. Conservation Biology. 30:196–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes PM, Botelho H. 2003. A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1:117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint CG. 2007. Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska. Risk Analysis. 27:1597–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffariyan MR, Brown M. 2013. Selecting the efficient harvesting method using multiple criteria analysis: a case study in south-west Western Australia. Journal of Forest Science. 59(12):479–486.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P, Lindermayer DB. 2002. Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. Melbourne (Australia): CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gill M. 2008. Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in reserves: fire and adaptive management. Melbourne (Australia): IC.Department of Sustainability and Environment. Report 73 ISBN: 978-1-74208-869-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP. 2011. Quantifying fine fuel dynamics and structure in dry eucalypt forest (Eucalyptus marginata) in Western Australia for fire management. Forest Ecology and Management. 262:531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Ellis PF, Knight IK, Sullivan AL. 2007a. Project Vesta –fire in dry eucalypt forest: fuel structure, dynamics and fire behaviour. Canberra (Australia): Ensis-CSIRO and WA Department of Environment and Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Ellis PF, Matthews S. 2007b. Field guide: fire in dry eucalypt forest. Canberra (Australia): Ensis-CSIRO and WA Department of Environment and Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths AD, Brooks BW. 2014. Effect of fire on small mammals: a systematic review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 23:1034–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindlay D. 2015. Mechanical removal of trees to reduce bushfire risk; could America’s $400 million program work in Australia? ABC Rural, Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). [cited April 10]. Available from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-10/bushfire-trials-prevention-clearing-forestry-fire/6383854
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson K, Watson A. 2007. Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Society & Natural Resources. 20:705–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon ME, Sexton J. 1996. Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. Publication No. 20. Washington (DC): US Long-term Ecological Research Network Office, University of Washington. Available from: http://old.lternet.edu/research/pubs/woodydetritus/
   Google Scholar
• Hartsough BR, Abrams S, Barbour RJ, Drews ES, McIver JD, Moghaddas JJ, Schwilk DW, Stephens SL. 2008. The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: financial and policy implications from the national fire and fire surrogate study. Forest Policy and Economics. 10:344–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines F, Tolhurst KG, Wilson AAG, McCarthy GJ. 2010. Overall fuel hazard guide. Melbourne (Australia): Department of Sustainability and Environment. Fire and adaptive management Report no. 82.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes L. 2014. Be prepared: climate change and the NSW bushfire threat. (Australia): Climate Council of Australia. Available from: https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/e8f0829c13a23f8a6b234962baadf419.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hughes L, Fenwick J. 2015. The burning issue: climate change and the Australian bushfire threat. (Australia): Climate Council of Australia. Available from: https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/burningissuereport2015
   Google Scholar
• Husch B, Miller CI, Beers TW. 1972. Forest mensuration. New York (NY): The Ronald Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Inions GB, Tanton MT, Davey SM. 1989. Effect of fire on the availability of hollows in trees used by the common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr, 1792, and the ringtail possum, Pseudocheirus peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785. Australian Wildlife Research. 16:449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston FH, Henderson SB, Chen Y, Randerson JT, Marlier M, DeFries RS, Kinney P, Bowman DMJS, Brauer M. 2012. Estimated global mortality attributable to smoke from landscape fires. Environmental Health Perspectives. 120:695–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating A, Handmer J. 2013. Future potential losses from extremes under climate change: the case of Victoria, Australia. Melbourne (Australia): Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research. Available from: http://www.vcccar.org.au/publication/working-paper/future-potential-losses-from-extremes-under-climate-change
   Google Scholar
• Keeley JE, Bond WJ, Bradstock RA, Pausas JC, Rundel PW. 2011. Fire in Mediterranean ecosystems. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kershaw AP, Clark JS, Gill AM, D’Costa DM. 2002. A history of fire in Australia. In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE and Gill MA, editors. Flammable Australia – the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehmaier M, Stampfer K. 2010. Development of a multi-attribute spatial decision support system in selecting timber harvesting systems. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering. 31:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law B, Park KJ, Lacki M. 2016. Chapter 5: insectivorous bats and silviculture: balancing timber production and bat conservation. In: Voigt CC and Kingston T, editors. Bats in the Anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world. New York: Springer International Publishing. p. 105–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lijeblad A, Borrie WT, Watson AE. 2009. Determinants of trust for public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest. Environmental Management. 43:571–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Blanchard W, McBurney L, Blair D, Banks SC, Driscoll D, Smit AL, Gill AM. 2013. Fire severity and landscape context effects on arboreal marsupials. Biological Conservation. 167:137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Blanchard W, McBurney L, Blair D, Banks SC, Likens GE, Franklin JF, William LF, Stein JAR, Gibbons P. 2012. Interacting factors driving a major loss of large trees with cavities in a forest ecosystem. PLoS One. 7: 1–16. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0041864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorensi do Canto J, Klepac J, Rummer B, Savoie PH, Seixas F. 2011. Evaluation of two round baling systems for harvesting understory biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy. 35:2163–2170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas C, Hennessy K, Mills G, Bathols J. 2007. Bushfire weather in Southeast Australia: recent trends and projected climate change impacts. Consultancy Report prepared for The Climate Institute of Australia. Available from: http://www.climateinstitute.org.au/verve/_resources/fullreportbushfire.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malmström A. 2010. The importance of measuring fire severity—evidence from microarthropod studies. Forest Ecology and Management. 260:62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo MJ, Fishbein M, Haas GE, Watson AE. 1990. Attitudes towards prescribed fire policies. Journal of Forestry. 88:19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews S, Sullivan AL, Watson P, Williams R. 2012. Climate change, fuel, and fire behaviour in a eucalypt forest. Global Change Biology. 18:3212–3223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur AG. 1967. Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Leaflet. Canberra (Australia): Forestry and Timber Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey S. 2002. For want of defensible space a forest is lost: homeowners and the wildfire hazard and mitigation in the residential wildland intermix at Incline Village, Nevada [ Doctoral dissertation]. [Berkeley (CA)]: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey S. 2004. Fighting fire with education: what is the best way to reach out to homeowners? Journal of Forestry. 102:12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey S, Moghadda J, Stephens S. 2008. Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 17:224–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Schindler B. 2013. Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 22:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey SM. 2006. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Newtown Square (PA): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. General Technical Report NRS-1.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy GJ, Tolhurst KG. 1998. Effectiveness of firefighting first attack operations by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment from 1991/92 – 1994/95. Melbourne (Australia): Victorian Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Fire Management Branch Research Report No. 47.
   Google Scholar
• McCaw WL. 2013. Managing forest fuels using a prescribed fire – a perspective from southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 294:217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIver J, Youngblood A, Stephens SL. 2009. The national fire and fire surrogate study: ecological consequences of fuel reduction methods in seasonally dry forests. Ecological Applications. 19:283–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean CM, Bradstock R, Price O, Kavanagh RP. 2015. Tree hollows and forest stand structure in Australian warm temperate Eucalyptus forests are adversely affected by logging more than wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management. 341:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe MC. 2006. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Newtown Square (PA): US Department of Agriculture. General Technical Report NRS–1.
   Google Scholar
• Munks S, Wapstra M, Corkrey R, Otley H, Miller G, Walker B. 2007. The occurrence of potential tree hollows in the dry eucalypt forests of south–eastern Tasmania, Australia. Australian Zoologist. 34:22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mylek M, Schirmer J. 2012. Reducing bushfire risk: public perceptions about fuel management strategies in the ACT and surrounds. Tasmania (Australia): CRC for Forestry. Technical Report 221.
   Google Scholar
• Mylek M, Schirmer J. 2016. Social acceptability of fuel management in the Australian capital territory and surrounding region. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 25(10):1093–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura G. 2004. Biomass thinning for fuel reduction and forest restoration – issues and opportunities. Redding (CA): University of California. University of California Cooperative Extension Report.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Commission. 2014. Brigalow and Nandewar State conservation areas: actively managing for better ecological outcomes. (Australia): Natural Resources Commission. Final Report. Available from: http://www.nrc.nsw.gov.au/active–management–cypress–forests-brigalow-nandewar
   Google Scholar
• OEH see Office of Environment and Heritage
   Google Scholar
• Office of Environment and Heritage. 2016. BioMetric. (Australia): Office of Environment and Heritage. Available from: http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/projects/BiometricTool.htm
   Google Scholar
• Parkes D, Newell G, Cheal D. 2003. Assessing the quality of native vegetation: the ‘habitat hectares’ approach. Ecological Management and Restoration. 4:S29–S38.
   Google Scholar
• Parnaby H, Lunney D, Shannon I, Fleming M. 2010. Collapse rates of hollow-bearing trees following low intensity prescription burns in the Pilliga forests, New South Wales. Pacific Conservation Biology. 16::209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Absher J, Robinson W. 2011. Symbolic meanings of wildland fire: a study of residents in the US inland northwest. Society and Natural Resources. 24:18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman TD, Binns DL, Shiels RJ, Allen RM, Kavanagh RP. 2008. Changes in understorey plant species richness following logging and prescribed burning in shrubby dry sclerophyll forests of south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecology. 33:197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman TD, Christie FJ, Andersen AN, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Henderson MK, Price O, Tran C, Wardle GM, Williams RJ, et al. 2011. Prescribed burning: how can it work to conserve the things we value? International Journal of Wildland Fire. 20:721–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman TD, Kavanagh RP, Binns DL, Melick DR. 2007. Patchiness of prescribed burns in dry sclerophyll eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 252:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike DA, Webb JK, Shine R. 2011. Chainsawing for conservation: ecologically informed tree removal for habitat management. Ecological Management and Restoration. 12(2):110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Plucinski MP. 2012. Factors affecting containment area and time of Australian forest fires featuring aerial suppression. Forest Science. 58:390–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucinski MP, McCarthy GJ, Hollis JJ, Gould JS. 2012. The effect of aerial suppression on the containment time of Australian wildfires estimated by fire management personnel. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 21:219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price OF, Penman TD, Bradstock RA, Boer MM, Clarke H. 2015. Biogeographical variation in the potential effectiveness of prescribed fire in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Biogeography. 42:2234–2245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor E, McCarthy G. 2015. Changes in fuel hazard following thinning operations in mixed-species forests in East Gippsland, Victoria. Australian Forestry. 78(4):195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyne SJ. 1992. Burning bush: a fire history of Australia. Sydney (Australia): Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. 2016. BioCondition. Available from: https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/biodiversity/biocondition/
   Google Scholar
• Recher HF, Davis WEJ Jr. 2013. Response of birds to a wildfire in the Great Western Woodlands, Western Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology. 19:188–203.
   Google Scholar
• Ross KA, Bedward M, Ellis MV, Deane A, Simpson CC, Bradstock RA. 2008. Modelling the dynamics of white cypress pine Callitris glaucophylla woodlands in inland south-eastern Australia. Ecological Modelling. 211:11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RL, Wamsley B. 2006. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Newton Square (PA): US Department of Agriculture. General Technical Report NRS-1.
   Google Scholar
• Schwilk DW, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, McIver J, Bailey JD, Fettig CJ, Fiedler CE, Harrod RJ, Moghaddas JJ, Outcalt KW, et al. 2009. The national fire and fire surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. Ecological Applications. 19:285–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shindle BA, Leahy J, Toman E. 2003. Public acceptance of forest conditions and fuel reduction practices: a survey of citizens in communities adjacent to national forests in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Corvallis (OR): USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Shindle BA, Toman E. 2003. Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities: a longitudinal analysis of public support. Journal of Forestry. 101:8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shindler BA, Brunson M, Stankey GH. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices, a problem analysis. Portland, (OR): US Department of Agriculture. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon P, Raison J, Keith H, Ritson P, Grierson P, Adams M, Montagu K, Bi H, Burrows W, Eamus D. 2002. Protocol for sampling tree and stand biomass. Canberra (Australia): Australian Greenhouse Office. Technical Report No. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens M. 2014. Active forest fire management for multiple landscape benefits in the United States and Canada. 2013 Gottstein Fellowship report. Available from: http://gottsteintrust.org/files/2015/10/2013-Gottstein-report-Stephens-Active-forest-fire-management1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stephens SL, Moghaddas J, Hartsough BR, Moghaddas E, Clinton NE. 2009. Fuel treatment effects on stand-level carbon pools, treatment related emissions, and fire risk in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 39:1538–1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teague B, McLeod R, Pascoe S. 2010. 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission final report. Victoria (Australia): 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Toman E, Shindle B, Brunson M. 2006. Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities. Society and Natural Resources. 19:321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toman E, Stidham M, Schindler B, McCaffrey S. 2011. Reducing fuels in the wildland–urban interface: community perceptions of agency fuels treatments. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 20:340–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuft KD, Crowther MS, McArthur C. 2013. Fire and grazing influence food resources of an endangered rock-wallaby. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 39:436–445.
   Google Scholar
• USDA see United States Department of Agriculture
   Google Scholar
• [USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Fire and Fire Surrogates (FFS) study. Available from: https://www.frames.gov/partner-sites/ffs/ffs-home
   Google Scholar
• Van Wagner CE. 1968. The line intersect method for forest fuel sampling. Forest Science. 14(1):20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske JJ, Absher JD, Bright AD. 2007. Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review. 14:223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt C, Winter G, Fried J. 2005. Predicting homeowners’ approval of fuel management at the wildland-urban interface using the theory of reasoned action. Society and Natural Resources. 18:337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible C, Sabatier P, Nechodom M. 2005. No sparks fly: policy participants agree on thinning trees in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Journal of Forestry. 103:5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisshaupt BR, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Robinson WD, Jakes PJ. 2005. Acceptability of smoke from prescribed forest burning in the northern Inland West: a focus group approach. Journal of Forestry. 103:189–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford KR. 2002. Hollows in jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) and marri (Corymbia calophylla) trees I. Hollow sizes, tree attributes and ages. Forest Ecology and Management. 160:201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter G, Vogt C, McCaffrey S. 2006. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Newton Square (PA): US Department of Agriculture. General Technical Report NRS-1.
   Google Scholar
• Winter GJ, Vogt C, Fried JS. 2002. Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry. 100:15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter GJ, Vogt CA, McCaffrey S. 2004. Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry. 102:8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood GB, Turner CB, Brack CL 1999. Code of forest mensuration practice: a guide to good tree measurement practice in Australia and New Zealand. Research Working Group #2. Canberra (Australian): Australia National University. Available from: http://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/mensuration/rwg2/code/
   Google Scholar
• Ximenes F, George BH, Cowie A, Williams J, Kelly G. 2012. Greenhouse gas balance of native forests in New South Wales, Australia. Forests. 3:653–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ximenes F, Mclean M, Sargeant D, Blasi M, Mo M, Coburn R. 2014. Determining coarse woody debris and fine litter in native forests in New South Wales and Victoria. Report for the Federal Department of Environment. Canberra (Australia): Federal Department of Environment.
   Google Scholar