References
- Abrams J, Nielsen E, Diaz D, Selfa T, Adams E, Dunn JL, Moseley C. 2018. How do states benefit from non-state governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification. Global Environmental Politics. 18(3):66–85.
- Auer MA. 2012. Group forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects. Human Ecology. 40:5–14.
- Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL. 2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 33:187–211.
- Blackman A, Raimondi A, Cubbage F. 2014. Does forest certification in developing countries have environmental benefits? Insights from Mexican corrective action requests. Working Paper, Resources for the Future. [accessed 2019 Jan 2]. Available from: https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-14-06.pdf
- Blackman A, Rivera J. 2011. Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification. Conservation Biology. 25(6):1176–1185. [accessed 2019 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/14713652/Producer-Level_Benefits_of_Sustainability_Certification
- Boakye-Danquah J, Reed MJ. 2019. The participation of non-industrial private forest owners in forest certification programs: the role and effectiveness of intermediary organizations. Forest Policy and Economics. 100:154–163.
- Boulay A, Tacconi L, Kanowski P. 2012. Drivers of adoption of eucalypt tree farming by smallholders in Thailand. Agroforestry Systems. 84:179–189.
- Brack D. 2013. Combatting illegal logging: interactions with WTO rules. Chatham House Briefing Paper. London (UK): The Royal Institute of International Affairs. [accessed 2019 May 10]. Available from: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy%2C%20Environment%20and%20Development/0513bp_brack.pdf
- Bronkhorst E, Cavallo E, van Dorth Tot Medler M-M, Klinghammer S, Smit HH, Gijsenbergh A, van der Laan C. 2017. Current practices and innovations in smallholder palm oil finance in Indonesia and Malaysia: long-term financing solutions to promote sustainable supply chains. Bogor (Indonesia): Center for International Forestry Research. Occasional Paper 177.
- Brown R, Zhang D. 2005. The sustainable forestry initiative’s impact on stumpage markets in the US South. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 35:2056–2064. [accessed 2019 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.uky.edu/Ag/AgEcon/pubs/resbrown_0119.pdf
- Buliga B, Nichiforel L. 2019. Voluntary forest certification vs. stringent legal frameworks: Romania as a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 207:329–342.
- Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newsom D. 2005. Forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Yale University Environment Paper 80, No. 9. [accessed 2019 Apr 5]. Available from: https://environment.yale.edu/files/biblio/YaleFES-00000147.pdf
- Cashore B, Stone MW. 2012. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance?: analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics. 18:13–22.
- Chen J, Innes J, Tikina A. 2010. Private cost-benefits of voluntary forest product certification. International Forestry Review. 12(1):1–12.
- Crow S, Danks C. 2010. Why certify? Motivations, outcomes and the importance of facilitating organizations in certification of community-based forestry initiatives. Small-Scale Forestry. 9(2):195–211.
- D’Hollander D, Tregurtha N. 2016. Exploring the potential of government and voluntary standards collaborations to scale up sustainable production and supply. Chapter 4. IUCN Policy Matters 21 – certification and biodiversity: how voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoods. Gland (Switzerland): International Union for Conservation of Nature; p. 59–72.
- Dare L. 2018. From global forests to local politics: unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification. Australian Journal of Political Science. 53(4):529–547.
- Dare M, Schirmer J, Vanclay F. 2014. Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 32(3):188–197. [accessed 2018 Jul 11]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14615517.2014.927108?scroll=top&needAccess=true
- Dasgupta S. 2017. Does forest certification really work? Mongabay series: conservation effectiveness. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: https://news.mongabay.com/2017/09/does-forest-certification-really-work/
- Duff G. 2017. Forestry and the case for research and innovation to enhance the social licence to operate. Australian Forestry. 80(2):67–69.
- Dykstra DP, Heinrich R. 1996. FAO model code of forest harvesting practice. [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/v6530e/v6530e00.HTM
- Easton G. 1988. Competition and marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing. 22(2):31–49. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. doi:10.1108/eb027337
- Egan M. 2002. Setting standards: strategic advantages in international trade. Business Strategy Review. 13(1):51–64.
- FAO. 2019. Forestry production and trade statistics database. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; [accessed 2019 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO
- FAOSTAT. 2019. Food and agriculture data. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 2018 Dec 10; [accessed 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO
- Fernholz K, Kraxner F. 2012. Certified forest products markets, 2011–2012. UNECE/FAO Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2011–2012. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: www.etfrn.org/file.php/348/side-bar-the-impacts-of-eco-labelling-schemes.pdf
- Fischer C, Aguilar F, Jawahar P, Sedjo R. 2005. Forest certification: toward common standards? Washington (DC): Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper 05-10. [accessed 2019 May 1]. Available from: http://np-net.pbworks.com/f/RFF+(2005)+Forest+Certification+-+Towards+Common+Standards.pdf
- Flanagan A, Laity R. 2015. Over-regulated and under-marketed: challenges in supporting feasible verification processes in Lao PDR. A contribution to Project FST/2012/012: enhancing key elements of the value chain for plantation-grown wood in Lao PDR. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: http://laoplantation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ACIAR-verification-paper-v4-Final-1.pdf
- Flanagan AC, Midgley SJ, Stevens PR, McWhirter L. 2019. Smallholder tree-farmers and forest certification in Southeast Asia: productivity, risks and policies. Australian Forestry. 18(1):18–28. doi:10.1080/00049158.2018.1560569.
- Foundjem-Tita D, Speelman S, D’Haese M, Degrande A, Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandamme P, Tchoundjeu Z. 2013. A tale of transaction costs and forest law compliance: trade permits for non timber forest products in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics. 38:132–142.
- Friend C. 2004. Social contract theory. Internet encyclopaedia of philosophy. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/
- FSC (Forest Stewardship Council). 2019. Facts and figures. [accessed 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://fsc.org/en/page/facts-figures
- FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) Database. 2019. Public certificate search. [accessed 2019 Dec 9]. Available from: http://info.fsc.org/certificate.php#result
- Galloway KS, Louman B, Stoian D, Carrera F, González L, Trevin J. 2005. Changing paradigms in the forestry sector of Latin America. In: Mery G, Alfaro R, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M, editors. Forests in the global balance. Changing paradigms. IUFRO Vol. 17. Vienna (Austria): IUFRO; p. 243–264.
- Georgiadis NM, Cooper RJ. 2007. Development of a forest certification standard compatible with PEFC and FSC’s management requirements. A case study from Greece. Forestry. 80(2):113–135. [accessed 2018 Oct 21]. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpm004.
- Ghazoul J, Butler RA, Mateo-Vega J, Koh LP. 2010. REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25(7):396–402. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.005.
- Gough AD, Innes JL, Allen SD. 2008. Development of common indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators. 8(5):425–430.
- Guan Z, Kwee Fat J, Sheong P. 2019. The restricting effects of forest certification on the international trade of wood products. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. doi:10.1080/10549811.2019.1607756.
- Gunningham N, Sinclair D. 2017. Smart regulation. In: Drahos P, editor. Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Acton (Australia): ANU Press; p. 133–148. [accessed 2018 Dec 4]. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.16.
- Ha NT. 2017. Local state actors and institutions and forest certification in Vietnam. Toronto (Canada): York University. [master’s thesis]. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: http://ndeg.apps01.yorku.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Nga-Thi-Ha-Masters-thesis.pdf
- Harwood CE, Nambiar EKS. 2014. Sustainable plantation forestry in South-East Asia. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Technical Report No. 84. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP14685&dsid=DS2
- Hoang HTN, Hoshino S, Hashimoto S. 2014. Forest Stewardship Council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Forest Research. 20:35–42.
- Jayasinghe P, Allen SD, Bull GQ, Kozak RA. 2007. The status of forest certification in the Canadian value-added wood products manufacturing sector. The Forestry Chronicle. 83:113–125.
- Kanowski P, Sinclair D, Freeman B. 2000. Establishing comparability and equivalence amongst forest management certification schemes: critical elements for the assessment of schemes. Canberra (Australia): Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry.
- Kostoris K, Schioppa P. 2005. The principle of mutual recognition in the European integration process. Chippenham/Eastbourne (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kuit M, Waarts YR. 2014. Small-scale farmers, certification schemes and private standards: is there a business case? Costs and benefits of certification and verification systems for small-scale producers in cocoa, coffee, cotton, fruit and vegetable sectors. Wageningen (Netherlands): Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: https://publications.cta.int/media/publications/downloads/1823_PDF.pdf
- Lacey J, Edwards P, Lamont J. 2016. Social licence as social contract: procedural fairness and forest agreement-making in Australia. Forestry. 89(5):489–499. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpw027
- Laity R, Flanagan AC, Ha H, Ha N, Cu HV. 2016. Leveraging sustainability with profitability: verification mechanisms for smallholder plantations in Vietnam. A contribution to Project FST/2008/039: enhancement of production of Acacia and Eucalyptus peeled and sliced veneer products in Vietnam and Australia. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
- Lewin A, Mo K, Scheyvens H, Gabai S. 2019. Forest certification: more than a market-based tool, experiences from the Asia Pacific region. Sustainability. 11(9):2600.
- Lindstrom T, Hansen E, Juslin H. 1999. Forest certification: the view from Europe’s NIPFs. Journal of Forestry. 97(3):25–30.
- Ling S, Smith H, Xayvongsa L, Laity R. 2018. The evolution of certified teak grower groups in Luang Prabang, Lao PDR: an action research approach. Small-scale Forestry. 17:343–360.
- Lister J. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and the State: international approaches to forest co-regulation. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia Press. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/econostats/2013/05/09/creating-better-forestry-certification-programs-through-competition/#41559d473d07
- Mallet P, D’Hollander OKD, Fishman A, Gamble L. 2019. Credible assurance at a landscape scale: a discussion paper on landscape and jurisdictional assurance and claims. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: http://wwf.panda.org/?344454/Credible-assurance-for-landscape-approaches
- Maraseni T, Son H, Cockfield G, Vu H, Nghia T. 2017. The financial benefits of forest certification: case studies of acacia growers and a furniture company in Central Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 69:6–63.
- Marx A, Cuypers D. 2010. Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: what is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regulation and Governance. 4:408–434.
- Maryudi A, Nawir AA, Sumardamto P, Sekartaji DA, Soraya E, Yuwono T, Siswoko BD, Mulyana B, Supriyatno N. 2017. Beyond good wood: exploring strategies for small-scale forest growers and enterprises to benefit from legal and sustainable certification in Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. 118(1):17–29.
- May PH. 2002. Forest certification in Brazil: trade and environmental enhancement. Paper prepared for the Consumer Choice Council. [accessed 2019 Apr 28]. Available from: http://www.unecefaoiufro.lsu.edu/marketing/documents/2003-2006/gme03_022.pdf
- McDermott CL, Cashore B, Kanowski P. 2010. Global environmental forest policies. An international comparison. London (UK) and Sterling (VA): Earthscan.
- Meir-Dornberg J, Karmann M. 2016. FSC certification: a solution for smallholders and community managed forests. ETFRN News 57: September 2015. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.etfrn.org/index.php?id=48
- Michal J, Sujová A. 2016. Economic benefits and limitations arising from voluntary forest certification. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia. 4(4):119–125.
- Midgley SJ. 2016. The promise and reality of certification: help or hindrance to smallholders? In: Teak Agroforestry and Smallholder Workshop, Luang Prabang, Lao PDR. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: https://latarp.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/laos_smidgley_realityofcertification.pdf
- Midgley SJ, Stevens PR, Arnold RJ. 2017. Hidden assets: Asia’s smallholder wood resources and their contribution to supply chains of commercial wood. Australian Forestry. 80(1):10–25.
- Mitchell D, Ayrers G. 2012. Out of crooked timber: the consistency of Australia’s illegal logging prohibition bill with the WTO agreement. Environmental and Planning Law Journal. 29. University of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 596.
- Moffat K, Lacey J, Zhang A, Leipold S. 2016. The social licence to operate: a critical review. Forestry. 89(5):477–488.
- Molnar A. 2013. Forest certification and communities: looking forward to the next decade. Forest Trends. [accessed 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/forest-certification-and-communities-looking-forward-to-the-next-decade/
- Morrow D, Rondinelli D. 2002. Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. European Management Journal. 20(2):159–171.
- Nambiar EKS, Sands R. 2013. Plantations for wood production with environmental care. In: Sands R, editor. Forestry in a global context. 2nd ed. Wallingford (UK): CABI; p. 158–183.
- Nambiar EKS, Harwood CE, Kien ND. 2014. Acacia plantations in Vietnam: research and knowledge application to secure a sustainable future. Southern Forests. 77:1–10.
- NaturallyWood. 2010. Third party forest certification in British Columbia. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/third-party-certification-aug-2010pdf/
- Nicolaidis K. 1993. Mutual recognition, regulatory competition and the globalization of professional services. Chapter 4. In: Aharoni Y, editor. Coalitions and competition – the globalization of professional business services. London (UK): Routledge; p.51–65.
- Nova Scotia. 2012. Nova Scotia’s code of forest practice. A framework for the implementation of sustainable forest management. Halifax (NS): Department of Lands and Forestry. Report FOR 2012-3. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: https://novascotia.ca/natr/forestry/reports/Code-of-Forest-Practice.pdf
- Nussbaum R, Simula M. 2005. The forest certification handbook. 2nd ed. London (UK): Earthscan.
- Olam International Limited. 2015. 8 principles 5 years of impact. Olam Livelihood Charter 2015. Singapore: Olam International Limited. [accessed 2019 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.olamgroup.com/content/dam/olamgroup/pdffiles/Olam%20Livelihood%20Charter%20report%202015.pdf
- PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification). 2019a. PEFC global statistics: June. [accessed 2019 Oct 22]. Available from: https://storage.googleapis.com/pefc-platform/pefc.org/media/2019-08/9e8d4ddc-ac80-486a-9319-0a9dc5edff2c/2251dd6e-4e71-5138-a6c9-bb9c6336f194.pdf
- PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification). 2019b. Smallholder group certification programme. [accessed 2019 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.pefc.org/what-we-do/our-collective-impact/our-campaigns/smallholder-group-certification-programme
- Perdana A, Roshetko JM, Kurniawan I. 2012. Forces of competition: smallholding teak producers in Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 14(2):238–248.
- Poynton S. 2015. Beyond certification. London (UK): Taylor & Francis Group.
- Redclift M. 1987. Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. London (UK): Methuen & Co. Ltd.
- Rieck D, Winegarden W. 2013. Creating better forestry certification programs through competition. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/econostats/2013/05/09/creating-better-forestry-certification-programs-through-competition/#41559d473d07
- Rohadi D, Herawati T, Padoch C, Race D. 2015. Making timber plantations an attractive business for smallholders. Bogor (Indonesia): Center for International Forestry Research. CIFOR Infobriefs No. 114.
- Sasser E. 2003. Gaining leverage: NGO influence on certification institutions in the forest products sector. In: Teeter L, Cashore B, Zhang D, editors. Forest policy for private forestry: global and regional challenges. Oxon (UK): CABI Press; p. 229–244.
- Scott S, Vandergeest P, Young M. 2009. Certification standards and the governance of green foods in Southeast Asia. Chapter 3. In: Clapp J, Fuchs D, editors. Power and private interests in global food governance. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; p. 61–92.
- Sharachchandra L. 1991. Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development. 19(6):607–621.
- Smith H. 2014. Smallholder plantation legality in Lao PDR: a study to assess the legal barriers to smallholder plantations and the associated timber value chain. Discussion paper for Project FST/2010/012: enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Project Working Paper #2.
- Smith H, Kanowski P, Keenan R. 2018. Policy brief: smarter regulation of plantation wood value chains in Lao PDR. Improving policies for forest plantations to balance smallholder, industry and environmental needs. Canberra (Australia): Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. ACIAR Project FST/2014/047
- Smith H, Ling S, Boer K. 2017. Teak plantation smallholders in Lao PDR: what influences compliance with plantation regulations? Australian Forestry. 80:178–187.
- Staffordshire University (Business School). 2014. Case study – IKEA [international supply chain management – BSB20123-7]. [accessed 2019 May 14]. Available from: http://www.staffs.ac.uk/schools/business/resits/postgrad/InternationalSupplyChainMgmtIKEACaseStudy.pdf
- Stanley L, Roe S, Broadhead J, Parker C. 2015. The potential of voluntary sustainability initiatives to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Produced by Climate Focus for USAID’s LEAF Program. [accessed 2019 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephanie_Roe3/publication/281851800_The_Potential_of_Voluntary_Sustainability_Initiatives_to_Reduce_Emissions_from_Deforestation_and_Forest_Degradation/links/55fb69a608aeba1d9f3a117e/The-Potential-of-Voluntary-Sustainability-Initiatives-to-Reduce-Emissions-from-Deforestation-and-Forest-Degradation.pdf
- Susilawati D, Kanowski P, Setyowati A, Resosudarmo IAP, Race D. 2019. Compliance of smallholder timber value chains in East Java with Indonesia’s timber legality verification system. Forest Policy and Economics. 102:41–50.
- Tamanaha B. 2004. On the rule of law: history, politics, theory. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
- Teitelbaum S. 2014. Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry Outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada. Journal of Environmental Management. 132:257–267.
- Thornber K, Plouvier D, Bass S. 1999. Certification: barriers to benefits: a discussion of equity implications. Joensuu (Finland): European Forest Institute. Discussion Paper 8. [accessed 2018 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.fefr.org/files/attachments/dp_08.pdf
- Timber Queensland. 2015. Timber plantation operations code of practice for Queensland edition 1. [accessed 2020 Apr 22]. Available from: http://www.timberqueensland.com.au/Docs/Growing-Processing/Timber-Plantation-Operations-Code-of-Practice-Version-1.pdf
- Trishkin M, Lopatin E, Karjalainen T. 2014. Assessment of motivation and attitudes of forest industry companies toward forest certification in northwestern Russia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 29(3):283–293.
- Tröster R, Hiete M. 2018. Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes—a comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 196:1034–1043.
- Turnbull JW, Vanclay JK. 1998. Codes of forest practice and related research needs. In: Brown AG, editor. Sustainable forest management. Proceedings of the Hermon Slade International Workshop held at Melbourne, Australia; 1998 Nov 30–Dec 4. Fyshwick (Australia): Crawford Fund. p. 21–28.
- Van der Ven H. 2015. Correlates of rigorous and credible transnational governance: a cross-sectoral analysis of best practice compliance in eco-labelling. Regulation and Governance. 9(3):276–293.
- Van der Ven H, Cashore B. 2018. Forest certification: the challenge of measuring impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 32:104–111.
- Vandergeest P, Unno A. 2012. A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty, and empire. Political Geography. 31(6):358–367.
- Wibowo A, Santi Pratiwi S, Giessen L. 2019. Comparing management schemes for forest certification and timber-legality verification: complementary or competitive in Indonesia? Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 38(1):68–84.
- Wiersum F, Humphries S, van Bommel S. 2013. Certification of community forestry enterprises: experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance (online first). Small-scale Forestry. 12:15–31. [accessed 2019 Apr 2]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/Advice/Downloads/Certification_of_community_forestry_ente.pdf
- Wilkinson G. 1999. Codes of forest practice as regulatory tools for sustainable forest management. In: Ellis RC, Smethurst PJ, editors. Practising forestry today. 18th Biennial Conference of the Institute of Foresters of Australia; 1999 Oct 3–8; Hobart, Australia. Yarralumba (Australia): Institute of Foresters of Australia.
- Wilkinson G, Schofield M, Kanowski P. 2014. Regulating forestry—experience with compliance and enforcement over the 25 years of Tasmania’s forest practices system. Forest Policy and Economics. 40:1–11.
- WTO. 2010. Understanding the WTO: the agreements, standards and safety. Geneva (Switzerland): World Trade Organization. [accessed 2019 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm4_e.htm#TRS
- Xuan TP. 2012. Forest certification in Vietnam: summary of March 2012 workshop. [accessed 2018 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/forest-certification-in-vietnam
- Zastocki D, Lachowicz H, Sadowski J, Moskalik T. 2018. Changes in the assortment and species structure of timber harvested from the Polish managed part of Białowieża Forest. Sustainability. 10:3279.