References
- Alegria C, Tomé M. 2011. A set of models for individual tree merchantable volume prediction for Pinus pinaster Aiton in central inland of Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research. 130(5):871–879. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0479-3.
- Australian National Greenhouse Accounts. 2019. National Inventory Report 2017, Volume 2. The Australian Government Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Canberra (Australia): Department of the Environment and Energy.
- Bi H, Hamilton F. 1998. Stem volume equations for native tree species in southern New South Wales and Victoria. Australian Forestry. 61(4):275–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.1998.10674752.
- Brooks JR, Wiant HV Jr. 2008. Ecoregion-based local volume equations for Appalachian hardwoods. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 25(2):87–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/25.2.87.
- Brown S, Gillespie AJ, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science. 35(4):881–902.
- Cao QV, Burkhart HE. 1980. Cubic-foot volume of loblolly pine to any height limit. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 4(4):166–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/4.4.166.
- Case BS, Hall RJ. 2008. Assessing prediction errors of generalized tree biomass and volume equations for the boreal forest region of west-central Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 38(4):878–889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x07-212.
- Cormier KL, Reich RM, Czaplewski RL, Bechtold WA. 1992. Evaluation of weighted regression and sample size in developing a taper model for loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management. 53(1):65–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90034-7.
- Dauber E, Fredericksen TS, Peña M. 2005. Sustainability of timber harvesting in Bolivian tropical forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 214(1):294–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.019.
- Fang J-Y, Wang GG, Liu G-H, Xu S-L. 1998. Forest biomass of China: an estimate based on the biomass–volume relationship. Ecological Applications. 8(4):1084–1091.
- Filho AF, Machado SA, Carneiro MRA. 2000. Testing accuracy of log volume calculation procedures against water displacement techniques (xylometer). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 30(6):990–997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-006.
- Fonweban J, Gardiner B, Auty D. 2012. Variable-top merchantable volume equations for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Northern Britain. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 85(2):237–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpr069.
- Gilabert H, Paci C. 2010. An assessment of volume-ratio functions for Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in Chile. Ciencia E Investigación Agraria. 37(1):5–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202010000100001.
- Haverd V, Raupach MR, Briggs PR, Canadell JG, Davis SJ, Law RM, Meyer CP, Peters GP, Pickett-Heaps C, Sherman B. 2013. The Australian terrestrial carbon budget. Biogeosciences. 10(2):851–869. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-851-2013.
- Kozak A. 1997. Effects of multicollinearity and autocorrelation on the variable-exponent taper functions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27(5):619–629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x97-011.
- Kozak A, Kozak R. 2003. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 33(6):976–987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-022.
- Kumar L, Mutanga O. 2017. Remote sensing of above-ground biomass. Remote Sensing. 9(9):935. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090935.
- Kurz WA, Dymond CC, White TM, Stinson G, Shaw CH, Rampley GJ, Smyth C, Simpson BN, Neilson ET, Trofymow JA, et al. 2009. CBM-CFS3: a model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards. Ecological Modelling. 220(4):480–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.10.018.
- Lee DJ, Huth JR, Osborne DO, Hogg BW. 2010. Selecting hardwood taxa for wood and fibre production in Queensland’s subtropics. Australian Forestry. 73(2):106–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2010.10676316.
- López-Martínez JO, Vargas-Larreta B, Aguirre-Calderón OA, Aguirre-Calderón CG, Macario-Mendoza PA, Martínez-Salvador M, Álvarez-González JG. 2019. Compatible taper-volume systems for major tropical species in Mexico. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 00:1–19.
- Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Apan A. 2011. Analysis of spacing for spotted gum plantations for maximizing merchantable logs’ volume in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 30(7):619–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2010.550548.
- Mitchard ETA, Feldpausch TR, Brienen RJW, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Monteagudo A, Baker TR, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, Quesada CA, Gloor M, et al. 2014. Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 23(8):935–946. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12168.
- Nabuurs G-J, Lindner M, Verkerk PJ, Gunia K, Deda P, Michalak R, Grassi G. 2013. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nature Climate Change. 3(9):792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1853.
- Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R, Hom J, Melillo J. 2004. New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: effects of age–class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Climatic Change. 67(2):211–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5.
- Paul KI, Larmour JS, Roxburgh SH, England JR, Davies MJ, Luck HD. 2017. Measurements of stem diameter: implications for individual- and stand-level errors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 189(8):416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6109-x.
- Paul KI, Roxburgh SH, England JR, de Ligt R, Larmour JS, Brooksbank K, Murphy S, Ritson P, Hobbs T, Lewis T, et al. 2015. Improved models for estimating temporal changes in carbon sequestration in above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings. Forest Ecology and Management. 338:208–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.025.
- Richards GP, Evans DM. 2004. Development of a carbon accounting model (FullCAM Vers. 1.0) for the Australian continent. Australian Forestry. 67(4):277–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2004.10674947.
- Roxburgh S, Paul K, Clifford D, England J, Raison R. 2015. Guidelines for constructing allometric models for the prediction of woody biomass: how many individuals to harvest? Ecosphere. 6(3):1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00251.1.
- Schreuder HT, Gregoire TG, Wood GB. 1993. Sampling methods for multiresource forest inventory. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
- Schumacher FX, Hall FS. 1933. Logarithmic expression of timber tree volume. Journal of Agricultural Research. 47:719–734.
- Scolforo HF, McTague JP, Burkhart H, Roise J, Carneiro RL, Stape JL. 2018. Generalized stem taper and tree volume equations applied to eucalyptus of varying genetics in Brazil. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 49(5):447–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0276.
- Sherrill JR, Bullock BP, Mullin TJ, McKeand SE, Purnell RC. 2011. Total and merchantable stem volume equations for midrotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 35(3):105–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/35.3.105.
- Shiver BD, Brister GH. 1992. Tree and stand volume functions for Eucalyptus saligna. Forest Ecology and Management. 47(1):211–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90275-E.
- Spurr SH. 1952. Forest inventory. New York (NY): The Ronald Press Co.
- Vallet P, J-f D, Le Moguédec G, Ravart M, Pignard G. 2006. Development of total aboveground volume equations for seven important forest tree species in France. Forest Ecology and Management. 229(1−3):98–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.013.
- Van Deusen PC, Sullivan AD, Matvey TG. 1981. A prediction system for cubic foot volume of loblolly pine applicable through much of its range. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 5(4):186–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/5.4.186.
- Vanclay JK, Shepherd PJ. 1982. Compendium of volume equations for plantation species used by the Queensland Department of Forestry. Brisbane (Australia): Queensland Department of Forestry.
- VSN International. 2011. Genstat for Windows. 14th ed. Hemel Hempstead (UK): VSN International.
- Watt MS, Coker G, Clinton PW, Davis MR, Parfitt R, Simcock R, Garrett L, Payn T, Richardson B, Dunningham A. 2005. Defining sustainability of plantation forests through identification of site quality indicators influencing productivity—A national view for New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management. 216(1):51–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.064.
- Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research. 30(1):79–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079.
- Zhang Y, Borders BE, Bailey RL. 2002. Derivation, fitting, and implication of a compatible stem taper-volume-weight system for intensively managed, fast growing loblolly pine. Forest Science. 48(3):595–607.