Post-harvesting glyphosate and imazapyr application on Eucalyptus stumps to control coppice

References

• AGROFIT (Sistemas de Agrotóxicos Fitossanitários). 2020. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) do Brasil. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. www.agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons
   Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 22(6):711–728. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BASF. 2018. Chopper Florestal®: herbicida para pinus e eucalipto. [accessed 2020 Apr 20]. http://www.agriculture.basf.com/br/pt/Proteção-de-Cultivos/Chopper-Florestal
   Google Scholar
• Burrows GE. 2013. Buds, bushfires and resprouting in the eucalypts. Australian Journal of Botany. 61(5):331. doi:10.1071/BT13072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano MS, Ramalho TC, Botrel DF, da Cunha EFF, de Mello WC. 2012. Understanding the inactivation process of organophosphorus herbicides: a DFT study of glyphosate metallic complexes with Zn 2+, Ca 2+, Mg 2+, Cu 2+, Co 3+, Fe 3+, Cr3+, and Al3+. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 112(15):2752–2762. doi:10.1002/qua.23222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerveira Junior WR, da Costa YKS, Carbonari CA, Duke SO, Alves PL, de Carvalho LB. 2020. Growth, morphological, metabolic and photosynthetic responses of clones of eucalyptus to glyphosate. Forest Ecology and Management. 470–471:118218. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ, Lamont BB, Ojeda F, Burrows GE, Enright NJ, Knox KJE. 2013. Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire. New Phytologist. 197(1):19–35. doi:10.1111/nph.12001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Borges MP, Silva DV, de Freitas Souza M, Silva TS, da Silva Teófilo TM, da Silva CC, Pavão QS, de Jesus Passos ABR, dos Santos JB. 2021. Glyphosate effects on tree species natives from Cerrado and Caatinga Brazilian biome: assessing sensitivity to two ways of contamination. Science of the Total Environment. 769:144113. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade TCGR, Bacha AL, de Camargo MB, de Carvalho LB. 2022. Influence of phosphorus fertilization on the response of pinus genotypes to glyphosate subdoses. New Forests. 53(1):143–160. doi:10.1007/s11056-021-09849-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho LB, Alves PL da CA, da Costa FRD. 2015. Differential response of clones of eucalypt to glyphosate. Revista Árvore. 39(1):177–187. doi:10.1590/0100-67622015000100017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro EB, Carbonari CA, Velini ED, Belapart D, Gomes GLGC, Ben R. 2016. Absorção, translocação e efeitos metabólicos do glyphosate em plantas de eucalipto. Scientia Forestalis. 44(11):719–727. doi:10.18671/scifor.v44n111.18.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas-Silva L, de Araújo TO, Nunes-Nesi A, Ribeiro C, Costa AC, da Silva LC. 2020. Evaluation of morphological and metabolic responses to glyphosate exposure in two neotropical plant species. Ecological Indicators. 113:106246. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza FC, dos Reis GG, Reis Mdas GF, Leite HG, de Faria RS, Caliman JP, Barbosa RA, de Oliveira CHR. 2016. Growth of intact plants and coppice in short rotation eucalypt plantations. New Forests. 47(2):195–208. doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9509-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass CH, Nissen SJ, Meiman PJ, Kniss AR. 2016. Impacts of imazapyr and triclopyr soil residues on the growth of several restoration species. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 69(3):199–205. doi:10.1016/j.rama.2016.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake PL, Mendham DS, White DA, Ogden GN. 2009. A comparison of growth, photosynthetic capacity and water stress in Eucalyptus globulus coppice regrowth and seedlings during early development. Tree Physiology. 29(5):663–674. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake PL, Mendham DS, White DA, Ogden GN, Dell B. 2012. Water use and water-use efficiency of coppice and seedling Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: a comparison of stand-scale water balance components. Plant and Soil. 350(1–2):221–235. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0897-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firmino LE, Tuffi Santos LD, Ferreira FA, Ferreira LR, Tiburcio RAS. 2008. Sorção do imazapyr em solos com diferentes texturas. Planta Daninha. 26(2):395–402. doi:10.1590/S0100-83582008000200016.
   Google Scholar
• Florencia FM, Carolina T, Enzo B, Leonardo G. 2017. Effects of the herbicide glyphosate on non-target plant native species from Chaco forest (Argentina). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 144:360–368. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelli VR, Bedmar F, Costa JL. 2014. Persistence and sorption of imazapyr in three Argentinean soils: persistence and sorption of imazapyr in Argentinean soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 33(1):29–34. doi:10.1002/etc.2400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves JL de M, Alvares CA, Higa AR, Silva LD, Alfenas AC, Stahl J, de Barros Ferraz SF, de Paula Lima W, Brancalion PHS, Hubner A, et al. 2013. Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 301:6–27. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard RM, Stape J, Ryan MG, Almeida AC, Rojas J. 2010. Effects of irrigation on water use and water use efficiency in two fast growing Eucalyptus plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 259(9):1714–1721. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBÁ (Indústria Brasileira de Árvores). 2019. Report 2019. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. www.iba.org
   Google Scholar
• Isbister KM, Lamb EG, Stewart KJ. 2017. Herbicide toxicity testing with non-target boreal plants: the sensitivity of Achillea millefolium L. and Chamerion angustifolium L. to triclopyr and imazapyr. Environmental Management. 60(1):136–156. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0867-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan M, Alister C. 2010. Glyphosate use in forest plantations. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 70(4):652–666. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392010000400017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little KM. 2003. Killing Eucalyptus grandis cut stumps after multiple coppice rotations in the KwaZulu-Natal midlands, South Africa. The Southern African Forestry Journal. 199:7–13. doi:10.1080/20702620.2003.10431745.
   Google Scholar
• Little KM. 2007. Final results from a Eucalyptus grandis x E. camaldulensis coppice trial. Scientia Forestalis. 76:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Little KM, Eccles NS. 2000. Control of Eucalyptus grandis cut-stumps of single-stem origin. The Southern African Forestry Journal. 187(1):45–49. doi:10.1080/10295925.2000.9631255.
   Google Scholar
• Little KM, Gardner RAW. 2003. Coppicing ability of 20 Eucalyptus species grown at two high-altitude sites in South Africa. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 33(2):181–189. doi:10.1139/x02-170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little KM, van den Berg GJ. 2007. Comparison of different herbicides for single stem Eucalyptus macarthurii cut stump control. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 19:13–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43594692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins GL, Friggi CA, Prestes OD, Vicari MC, Friggi DA, Adaime MB, Zanella R. 2014. Simultaneous LC–MS/MS determination of imidazolinone herbicides together with other multiclass pesticide residues in soil. Clean–Soil, Air, Water. 42(10):1441–1449. doi:10.1002/clen.201300140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meftaul IM, Venkateswarlu K, Dharmarajan R, Annamalai P, Asaduzzaman M, Parven A, Megharaj M. 2020. Controversies over human health and ecological impacts of glyphosate: is it to be banned in modern agriculture? Environmental Pollution. 263:114372. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minogue PJ, Lorentz KA. 2020. Comparison of aminocyclopyrachlor to standard herbicides for basal stem treatment of Eucalyptus benthamii. Weed Technology. 35:304–308. doi:10.1017/wet.2020.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minogue PJ, Osiecka A, Lauer DK. 2018. Selective herbicides for establishment of Eucalyptus benthamii plantations. New Forests. 49:529–550. doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9637-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payn T, Carnus JM, Freer-Smith P, Kimberley M, Kollert W, Liu S, Orazio C, Rodriguez L, Silva LN, Wingfield MJ. 2015. Changes in planted forests and future global implications. Forest Ecology and Management. 352:57–67. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz AA, Martins JAS, Cunha JPAR. 2008. Adjuvants and water quality in pesticide application. Bioscience Journal. 24(4):8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JC, Little KM, Light ME. 2016. The use of glyphosate for the management of secondary coppice regrowth in a Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla coppice stand in Zululand, South Africa. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science. 78(3):217–223. doi:10.2989/20702620.2016.1183094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JC, Little KM, Light ME. 2018. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of different eucalypt cut-stump control management options to reduce competition from coppice regrowth during stand establishment in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science. 80(3):261–268. doi:10.2989/20702620.2017.1354283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha JHT, Wenzel AVA, Melo EASC, Lima ÂSF, Hakamada RE, de Vicente Ferraz A, Arthur Junior JC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Moreira G, Gonçalves AN. 2019. Responses of coppiced Eucalyptus to macro- and micronutrient application. New Forests. 50(5):717–731. doi:10.1007/s11056-018-09695-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues BN, Almeida F. 2018. Guia de herbicidas. Londrina (Brazil): Iapar.
   Google Scholar
• Rolando C, Baillie B, Thompson D, Little K. 2017. The risks associated with glyphosate-based herbicide use in planted forests. Forests. 8(6):208. doi:10.3390/f8060208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado TP, Alves PLCA, Kuva MA, Takahashi EN, Dias TCS, Lemes LN. 2011. Sintomas da intoxicação inicial de Eucalyptus proporcionados por subdoses de glyphosate aplicadas no caule ou nas folhas. Planta Daninha. 29(4):913–922. doi:10.1590/S0100-83582011000400022.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado T, Pereira FCM, Kuva MA, Alves PLCA. 2017. Effects of glyphosate on growth, yield and wood of Eucalyptus grandis. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 29(3):257–266. doi:10.26525/jtfs2017.29.3.257266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva NF, Barros NF, Neves JCL, Schulthais F, Novais RF, Mattiello EM. 2020. Yield and nutrient demand and efficiency of eucalyptus under coppicing regime. Forests. 11(8):852. doi:10.3390/f11080852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva CMM, Ferreira LR, Ferreira FA, Miranda GV. 2004. Root exudation of imazapyr by eucalypt, cultivated in soil. Planta Daninha. 22(1):109–116. doi:10.1590/S0100-83582004000100014.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffi Santos LD, Ferreira FA, Ferreira LR, Duarte WM, Tiburcio RAS, Santos MV. 2006. Intoxicação de espécies de eucalipto submetidas à deriva do glyphosate. Planta Daninha. 24(2):259–264. doi:10.1590/S0100-83582006000200020.
   Google Scholar
• Viti ML, Alves PAT, Mendes KF, Pimpinato RF, Guimarães ACD, Tornisielo VL. 2019. Translocation and root exudation of glyphosate by Urochloa brizantha and its transport on sugarcane and citrus seedlings. Planta Daninha. 37:e019183334. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582019370100030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinzettel J, Pfister S. 2019. International trade of global scarce water use in agriculture: modeling on watershed level with monthly resolution. Ecological Economics. 159:301–311. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavari S, Abualqumboz M, Sapari N, Hata-Suhaimi HA, Nik-Fuaad NZ, Yavari S. 2020. Sorption of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides on chitosan-modified biochars. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 17:3341–3350. doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02629-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar