Incorporating management flexibility: a Real Options Approach to harvesting Eucalyptus plantations

References

• Antunes JLF, Cardoso MRA. 2015. Uso da análise de séries temporais em estudos epidemiológicos. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 24(3):565–576. doi:10.5123/s1679-49742015000300024.
   Google Scholar
• B3 S.A. (Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão). 2021. Cotações históricas. [accessed 2021 Dec 13]. http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/servicos-de-dados/market-data/historico/mercado-a-vista/cotacoes-historicas/
   Google Scholar
• Bastian-Pinto C, Brandão L, Alves ML. 2010. Valuing the switching flexibility of the ethanol-gas flex fuel car. Annals of Operations Research. 176(1):333–348. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0514-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bistline JE, Comello SD, Sahoo A. 2018. Managerial flexibility in levelized cost measures: a framework for incorporating uncertainty in energy investment decisions. Energy. 151:211–225. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.036.
   Google Scholar
• Caceres AI, Liu B, Jabba SV, Achanta S, Morris JB, Jordt SE. 2017. Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 8 channels mediate the anti-inflammatory effects of eucalyptol. British Journal of Pharmacology. 174(9):867–879. doi:10.1111/bph.13760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo DA, Munis RA, Rocha QS, Simões D. 2022. Evaluation of occupational noise exposure among forest machine operators: a study on the harvest of Pinus taeda trees. Australian Forestry. 85(2):89–94. doi:10.1080/00049158.2022.2099121.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Cheng Y. 2007. Non-normality effects on the economic-statistical design of over(X) charts with Weibull in-control time. European Journal of Operational Research. 176(2):986–998. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chladná Z. 2007. Determination of optimal rotation period under stochastic wood and carbon prices. Forest Policy and Economics. 9(8):1031–1045. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2006.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Stuart A. 1955. Some quick sign tests for trend in location and dispersion. Biometrika. 42(1/2):80. doi:10.2307/2333424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz G, Moreno B, Coto J, Gómez-Aleixandre J. 2015. Valuation of wind power distributed generation by using Longstaff-Schwartz option pricing method. Applied Energy. 145:223–233. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.046.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Wright J. 2012. Silviculture and economic evaluation of eucalypt plantations in the Southern US. BioResources. 7(2):1994–2001. doi:10.15376/biores.7.2.1994-2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duku-Kaakyire A, Nanang DM. 2004. Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis. Forest Policy and Economics. 6(6):539–552. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00003-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MRP. 2006. Análise da sensibilidade dos testes de normalidade de Jarque-Bera e Lilliefors em modelos de regressão linear. Revista de Matemática e Estatística. 24(4):89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan AC, Midgley SJ, Stevens PR. 2020. Smallholder tree-farmers and forest certification in Southeast Asia: alternative approaches to deliver more benefits to growers. Australian Forestry. 83(2):52–65. doi:10.1080/00049158.2020.1762150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadow K, Hensbergen HJ. 1987. Contributions to forestry modelling research. South African Forestry Journal. 140(1):44–50. doi:10.1080/00382167.1987.9630069.
   Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Porter‐Hudak S. 1983. The estimation and application of long memory time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 4(4):221–238. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.1983.tb00371.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Cunya LA, Fardhosseini MS, Lee HW, Choi K. 2020. Analyzing investments in flood protection structures: a real options approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 43:101377. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guj P, Chandra A. 2019. Comparing different real option valuation approaches as applied to a copper mine. Resources Policy. 61:180–189. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie G, Kumareswaran D. 2009. Carbon subsidies, taxes and optimal forest management. Environmental and Resource Economics. 43(2):275–293. doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9238-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins C, Palmer A, Nixon R. 2015. Eucalyptus oil: contact allergy and safety. Contact Dermatitis. 72(5):344–346. doi:10.1111/cod.12376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho SH, Liao SH. 2011. A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(12):15296–15302. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• Ibáñez A, Zapatero F. 2004. Monte Carlo valuation of American options through computation of the optimal exercise frontier. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 39(2):253–275. doi:10.1017/s0022109000003069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insley M. 2002. A real options approach to the valuation of a forestry investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44(3):471–492. doi:10.1006/jeem.2001.1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insley M, Rollins K. 2005. On solving the multirotational timber harvesting problem with stochastic prices: a linear complementarity formulation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 87(3):735–755. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00759.x.
   Google Scholar
• Insley MC, Wirjanto TS. 2010. Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: contingent claims versus dynamic programming. Journal of Forest Economics. 16(2):157–176. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto de Economia Agrícola. 2021a. Mercados Florestais. [accessed 2021 Dec 11]. http://ciagri.iea.sp.gov.br/MERCADOSFLORESTAIS/
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Economia Agrícola. 2021b. Valor da terra nua. [accessed 2021 Nov 11]. http://ciagri.iea.sp.gov.br/bancoiea_TEste/Precor_TerraNua_SEFAZ.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Joaquim MS, Án S, Souza SN, Pereira RS, Angelo H. 2015. Aplicação da teoria das opções reais na análise de investimentos em sistemas Agroflorestais. Cerne. 21(3):439–447. doi:10.1590/01047760201521031658.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Morgan. 2021. Emerging markets bond index + BR (Org.). [accessed on 2021 Dec 15]. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ExibeSerie.aspx?serid=40940&module=M.
   Google Scholar
• Legislação Tributária Federal. 1996. Constituição. 1996. Lei no 9430, de 27 de Dezembro de 1996. Brasília (Brazil): Legislação Tributária Federal. [accessed 2021 Feb 14]. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9430.htm
   Google Scholar
• Li SX, Knights P. 2009. Integration of real options into short-term mine planning and production scheduling. Mining Science and Technology. 19(5):674–678. doi:10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60125-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors HW. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 62(2):399–402. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima MVA, Lima CRM, Dutra A, Lopes ALM. 2010. Avaliação de micro e pequenas empresas utilizando a metodologia multicritério e o método do fluxo de caixa descontado. Revista de Ciências Da Administração. 12(26):48–71. doi:10.5007/2175-8077.2010v12n26p48.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Zhang M, Zhao Z. 2019. The application of real option to renewable energy investment: a review. Energy Procedia. 158:3494–3499. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.921.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes CDC, Blank FF, Thomé AMT, Valladão DM. 2019. Investment decisions in an oil refinery in Brazil under a real option approach. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management. 16(3):375–386. doi:10.14488/bjopm.2019.v16.n3.a2.
   Google Scholar
• Maier CA, Albaugh TJ, Cook RI, Hall K, McInnis D, Johnsen KH, Johnson J, Rubilar RA, Vose JM. 2017. Comparative water use in short-rotation Eucalyptus benthamii and Pinus taeda trees in the Southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 397:126–138. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley B. 2013. How does real option value compare with Faustmann value in the context of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme? Forest Policy and Economics. 30:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Manley B, Niquidet K. 2017. How does real option value compare with Faustmann value when log prices follow fractional Brownian motion? Forest Policy and Economics. 85:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.017.
   Google Scholar
• Marathe RR, Ryan SM. 2005. On the validity of the geometric Brownian motion assumption. Engineering Economist. 50(2):159–192. doi:10.1080/00137910590949904.
   Google Scholar
• Marques J, Cunha M, Savic D. 2015. Using real options in the optimal design of water distribution networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management (ASCE). 141(2):1–10. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000448.
   Google Scholar
• Matias MA, Silva CAT, Vieira L. 2005. Analysis of price behavior patterns for revenue projections: statistical tests of a copper price time series. Brazilian Business Review. 2(2):108–123. doi:10.15728/bbr.2005.2.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Siegel D. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 101(4):707–728. doi:10.2307/1884175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RA, Voltaire K. 1983. A stochastic analysis of the tree paradigm. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. 6:371–386. doi:10.1016/0165-1889(83)90060-X
   Google Scholar
• Moody's. 2021. Rating Action. [accessed 2021 Dec 13]. https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-altera-perspectiva-do-rating-do-Brasilpara-estvel-de–PR_382015?cy=bra&lang=pt
   Google Scholar
• Munis RA, Almeida RO, Camargo DA, Barbosa R, Wojciechowski J, Simões D. 2022. Machine learning methods to estimate productivity of harvesters: mechanized timber harvesting in Brazil. Forests. 13(7):1068. doi:10.3390/f13071068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munis RA, Martins JC, Camargo DA, Simões D. 2022. Dynamics of Pinus wood prices for different timber assortments: comparison of stochastic processes. Bois Et Forêts Des Tropiques. 351:45–52. doi:10.19182/bft2022.351.a36392.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete E. 2012. Modeling optimal pine stands harvest under stochastic wood stock and price in Chile. Forest Policy and Economics. 15:54–59. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Niquidet K, Sun L. 2012. Do forest products prices display long memory? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 60(2):239–261. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01244.x.
   Google Scholar
• Oeba V, Mahamane L, Otor SCJ, Kung’u JB, Mbae MN. 2017. Growing common plantation tree species in Kenya for sale of carbon and wood supply: what is the best bet? Southern Forests. A Journal of Forest Science. 79(2):117–124. doi:10.2989/20702620.2016.1274860.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson O, Hillring B, Vinterbäck J. 2011. European wood pellet market integration – a study of the residential sector. Biomass & Bioenergy. 35(1):153–160. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park B, Hwang E, Seo SA, Cho JG, Yang JE, Yi TH. 2018. Eucalyptus globulus extract protects against UVB-induced photoaging by enhancing collagen synthesis via regulation of TGF-β/Smad signals and attenuation of AP-1. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 637:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2017.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park T, Kim B, Kim H. 2013. Real Option Approach to sharing privatization risk in underground infrastructures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 139(6):685–693. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000636.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino R, Carbonara N, Costantino N. 2018. Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 248–261. doi:10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Petrasek S, Perez-Garcia JM. 2010. Valuation of timber harvest contracts as American call options with modified least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm. Forest Science. 56(5):494–504.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips PCB, Perron P. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75(2):335–346. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga AJ. 1998. The optimal timber rotation: an option value approach. Forest Science. 44(2):192–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha K, Moreira ARB, Reis EJ, Carvalho L. 2006. The market value of forest concessions in the Brazilian Amazon: a Real Option Approach. Forest Policy and Economics. 8(2):149–160. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.05.008.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues PHF, Ferreira VAC, Lemme CF, Brandão LET. 2013. Avaliação de empresas start-up por Opções Reais: o caso do setor de biotecnologia. Gestao e Producao. 20(3):511–523. doi:10.1590/S0104-530X2013000300002.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh JH, Mark G, Jordan NC. 2009. Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems. Journal of Engineering Design. 20(3):307–323. doi:10.1080/09544820701870813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samanez CP, Costa LA. 2009. Análise e avaliação de flexibilidades input-output em projetos de plantas na indústria do petróleo: uma aplicação da teoria das opções reais e da simulação estocástica. Gestão Da Produção, Operações e Sistemas. 2:63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter PA, Mußhoff O, Möhring B, Wilhelm S. 2016. Faustmann vs. real options theory – an experimental investigation of foresters’ harvesting decisions. Journal of Forest Economics. 24:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2016.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster P. 2016. Stochasticity in processes: fundamentals and applications to chemistry and biology. 1st ed. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• S&P Dow Jones. 2021. S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. [accessed 2021 Dec 15]. https://portugues.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp-global-timber-and-forestry-index
   Google Scholar
• Strange N, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ. 2019. Afforestation as a real option with joint production of environmental services. Forest Policy and Economics. 104:146–156. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.015.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira DMS, Brandão LET, Gomes LL. 2010. A decisão do preço de oferta em leilões de telecomunicação: uma análise por opções reais. Revista de Administração Mackenzie. 11(6):131–154. doi:10.1590/S1678-69712010000600008. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen BJ, Malchow-Moller N. 2003. Afforestation as a real option: some policy implications. In: Helles F, Strange N, Wichmann L, editors. Recent accomplishments in applied forest economics research. Vol. 74. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; p. 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis L, Tsekrekos AE. 2018. Real Options in operations research: a review. European Journal of Operational Research. 270(1):1–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood R. 2007. Assessing ‘management investment scheme’ forestry projects: a best-practice template for commercial plantation development. Australian Forestry. 70(4):269–274. doi:10.1080/00049158.2007.10675029.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Treasury. 2021. Daily treasury long term rate data. [accessed 2021 Dec 13]. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward M, Gouldby B, Kapelan Z, Khu ST, Townend I. 2011. Real Options in flood risk management decision making. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 4(4):339–349. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01119.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier A, Silva RL. 2009. Evolução da silvicultura clonal de Eucalyptus no brasil. Agronomía Costarricense. 34(1):93–98. doi:10.15517/rac.v34i1.6702.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Fu X, Oum TH, Yan J. 2017. Modeling airport capacity choice with real options. Transportation Research Part B. 100:93–114. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Xie F. 2009. Managerial flexibility, uncertainty, and corporate investment: the real options effect. International Review of Economics and Finance. 18(4):643–655. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Huang J, Zeng C. 2019. Ergodicity of stochastic Rabinovich systems driven by fractional Brownian motion. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.122955.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai J, Kuusela OP. 2020. Estimating price dynamics in the aftermath of forest disturbances: the biscuit fire in southwest Oregon. Forest Science. 66(5):556–567. doi:10.1093/forsci/fxaa004.
   Google Scholar