570
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

UAV-assisted seeding and monitoring of reforestation sites: a review

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 90-98 | Received 16 Nov 2023, Accepted 21 Mar 2024, Published online: 29 Apr 2024

References

  • Abdollahnejad A, Panagiotidis D, Surovỳ P. 2018. Estimation and extrapolation of tree parameters using spectral correlation between UAV and Pléiades data. Forests. 9(2):85. doi:10.3390/f9020085.
  • Aghai M, Manteuffel-Ross T. 2020. Enhancing direct seeding efforts with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) “swarms” and seed technology. Tree Planters’ Notes. 63(2):32–48.
  • Agisoft. 2023. Discover intelligent photogrammetry with Metashape. St Petersburg (Russia): Agisoft. https://www.agisoft.com/.
  • AirSeed. 2023. Home. Sydney (Australia): AirSeed. https://airseedtech.com/.
  • Balková M, Bajer A, Patočka Z, Mikita T. 2020. Visual exposure of rock outcrops in the context of a forest disease outbreak simulation based on a canopy height model and spectral information acquired by an unmanned aerial vehicle. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 9(5):325. doi:10.3390/ijgi9050325.
  • Biggs HJ. 2020. 3 – Aquatic vegetation monitoring with UAS. In: Green D, editor. Unmanned aerial remote sensing: uAS for environmental applications. Milton (UK): Taylor & Francis Group; p. 35–53.
  • Brieger F, Herzschuh U, Pestryakova LA, Bookhagen B, Zakharov ES, Kruse S. 2019. Advances in the derivation of Northeast Siberian forest metrics using high-resolution UAV-based photogrammetric point clouds. Remote Sensing. 11(12):1447. doi:10.3390/rs11121447.
  • Broek van den S. 2020. The effect of unmanned aircraft systems on predatory bird species: a comparison between drone and other known wildlife disturbing agents. Almere: Aeres Hogeschool.
  • Buters T, Belton D, Cross A. 2019a. Multi-sensor UAV tracking of individual seedlings and seedling communities at millimetre accuracy. Drones. 3(4):1–20. doi:10.3390/drones3040081.
  • Buters T, Belton D, Cross A. 2019b. Seed and seedling detection using unmanned aerial vehicles and automated image classification in the monitoring of ecological recovery. Drones. 3(15):1–16. doi:10.3390/drones3030053.
  • Cappiella K, Schueler T, Wright T. 2006. Urban watershed forestry manual. Part 2: Conserving and planting trees at development sites (NA-TP-01-06). Newtown Square (PA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
  • Carrera-Hernández JJ, Levresse G, Lacan P. 2020. Is UAV-SfM surveying ready to replace traditional surveying techniques? International Journal of Remote Sensing. 41(12):4820–4837. doi:10.1080/01431161.2020.1727049.
  • CASA. 2020. Micro and excluded remotely piloted aircraft operations (CASR PART 101). Canberra (Australia): Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australian Government.
  • Casas GG, Ismail ZH, Limeira MMC, da Silva AAL, Leite HG. 2023. Automatic detection and counting of stacked eucalypt timber using the YOLOv8 model. Forests. 14(12):2369. doi:10.3390/f14122369.
  • Castillo C, Pérez R, James MR, Quinton JN, Taguas EV, Gómez JA. 2012. Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 76(4):1319–1332. doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0390.
  • Clarke K. 2020. Mangrove-planting drones set to swoop in to restore UAE coastline. The National UAE; [accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/environment/mangrove-planting-drones-set-to-swoop-in-to-restore-uae-coastline-1.984279.
  • CO2 Revolution. 2023. Home. Navarra (Spain): CO2 Revolution. https://co2revolution.es/.
  • Corte APD, Rex FE, de Almeida DRA, Sanquetta CR, Silva CA, Moura MM, Wilkinson B, Zambrano AMA, da C NE, Veras HFP, et al. 2020. Measuring individual tree diameter and height using gatoreye high-density UAV-lidar in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system. Remote Sensing. 12(5): 863. doi:10.3390/rs12050863.
  • D’Oleire-Oltmanns S, Marzolff I, Peter KD, Ries JB. 2012. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing. 4(11):3390–3416. doi:10.3390/rs4113390.
  • DAFF. 2023. Australia’s State of Forests Report. Canberra (Australia): Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
  • Dainelli R, Toscano P, Di Gennaro SF, Matese A. 2021. Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicles forest remote sensing—a systematic review. Part II: Research applications. Forests. 12(4):397. doi:10.3390/f12040397.
  • Das M. 2023. How IISc scientists are seed bombing a barren land in Karnataka using drones. Bengaluru (India): The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/how-iisc-scientists-are-seed-bombing-barren-land-karnataka-using-drones-64155.
  • Dell M, Stone C, Osborn J, Glen M, McCoull C, Rimbawanto A, Tjahyono B, Mohammed C. 2019. Detection of necrotic foliage in a young Eucalyptus pellita plantation using unmanned aerial vehicle RGB photography – a demonstration of concept. Australian Forestry. 82(2):79–88. doi:10.1080/00049158.2019.1621588.
  • Dingley C, Cass P, Adhikari B, Daver F. 2024. Application of superabsorbent natural polymers in agriculture. Polymers from Renewable Resources. doi:10.1177/20412479231226166.
  • Dronecoria. 2023. Main. Pitres (Spain): Dronecoria. https://dronecoria.org/en/main/.
  • DroneSeed. 2023. Rapid Reforestation. Seattle (WA): DroneSeed. https://droneseed.com/.
  • Dupuis C, Lejeune P, Michez A, Fayolle A. 2020. How can remote sensing help monitor tropical moist forest degradation? – a systematic review. Remote Sensing. 12(7):1087. doi:10.3390/rs12071087.
  • Elliot S. 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica. 48(6):825–833. doi:10.1111/btp.12387.
  • FAO. 2020. The state of the world’s forests. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics. 41(3):375–392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5.
  • Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics. 68(3):643–653. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
  • Fraser BT, Congalton RG. 2021. Monitoring fine-scale forest health using unmanned aerial systems (UAS) multispectral models. Remote Sensing. 13(23):4873. doi:10.3390/rs13234873.
  • Gómez C, Goodbody TRH, Coops NC, Álvarez-Taboada F, Sanz-Ablanedo E. 2020. 11 – Forest ecosystem monitoring using unmanned aerial systems. In: Green D, editor. Unmanned aerial remote sensing: uAS for environmental applications. Milton (UK): Taylor & Francis Group; p. 173–196.
  • Goodbody TRH, Coops NC, Hermosilla T, Tompalski P, Crawford P. 2018. Assessing the status of forest regeneration using digital aerial photogrammetry and unmanned aerial systems. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 39(15–16):5246–5264. doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1402387.
  • Gornish E, Arnold H, Fehmi J. 2019. Review of seed pelletizing strategies for arid land restoration. Restoration Ecology. 27(6):1206–1211. doi:10.1111/rec.13045.
  • Government of Australia. 2024. Drones. Canberra (Australia): Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australian Government. [accessed 2024 Mar 12]. https://www.casa.gov.au/drones.
  • Gray D. 2023. Thai team fights climate change with aerial reseeding. Tokyo (Japan): NIKKEI Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Life-Arts/Life/Thai-team-fights-climate-change-with-aerial-reseeding?page=2.
  • Grossnickle S, Ivetic V. 2017. Direct seeding in reforestation – a field performance review. Reforesta. 12(4):94–142. doi:10.21750/REFOR.4.07.46.
  • Hakala T, Markelin L, Honkavaara E, Scott B, Theocharous T, Nevalainen O, Näsi R, Suomalainen J, Viljanen N, Greenwell C. 2018. Direct reflectance measurements from drones: sensor absolute radiometric calibration and system tests for forest reflectance characterization. Sensors. 18(5):1417. doi:10.3390/s18051417.
  • Han B, Qu T, Tong X, Jiang J, Zlatanova S, Wang H, Cheng C. 2022. Grid-optimized UAV indoor path planning algorithms in a complex environment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations & Geoinformation. 111:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102857.
  • Harris NL, Gibbs DA, Baccini A, Birdsey RA, de Bruin S, Farina M, Fatoyinbo L, Hansen MC, Herold M, Houghton RA, et al. 2021. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change. 11(3): 234–240. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6.
  • Hentz ÂMK, Silva CA, Dalla Corte AP, Netto SP, Strager MP, Klauberg C. 2018. Estimating forest uniformity in Eucalyptus spp. And Pinus taeda L. stands using field measurements and structure from motion point clouds generated from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data collection. Forest Systems. 27(2):e005. doi:10.5424/fs/2018272–11713.
  • Heritage S. 2018. Tropical pasture guide. Rocklea (Australia): Heritage Seeds.
  • Hu X, Li D. 2020. Research on a single-tree point cloud segmentation method based on UAV tilt photography and deep learning algorithm. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 13:4111–4120. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3008918.
  • Huang H, Li X, Chen C. 2018. Individual tree crown detection and delineation from very-high-resolution UAV images based on bias field and marker-controlled watershed segmentation algorithms. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 11(7):2253–2262. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2830410.
  • Hyun CU, Park M, Lee WY. 2020. Remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS)-based wildlife detection: a review and case studies in maritime Antarctica. Animals. 10(12). doi:10.3390/ani10122387.
  • Iizuka K, Yonehara T, Itoh M, Kosugi Y. 2018. Estimating tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) from digital surface models and orthophotos obtained with an unmanned aerial system for a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) forest. Remote Sensing. 10(1):13. doi:10.3390/rs10010013.
  • [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2019. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009157988.
  • Jaafar WSWM, Woodhouse IH, Silva CA, Omar H, Maulud KNA, Hudak AT, Klauberg C, Cardil A, Mohan M. 2018. Improving individual tree crown delineation and attributes estimation of tropical forests using airborne LiDAR data. Forests. 9(12):759. doi:10.3390/f9120759.
  • Javernick L, Brasington J, Caruso B. 2014. Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology. 213:166–182. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006.
  • Kümmerer R, Noack PO, Bauer B. 2023. Using high-resolution UAV imaging to measure canopy height of diverse cover crops and predict biomass. Remote Sensing. 15(6):1520. doi:10.3390/rs15061520.
  • Lacar FM, Lewis MM, Grierson IT 2001. Use of hyperspectral imagery for mapping grape varieties in the Barossa Valley, South Australia. IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IGARSS). 6:2875–2877. 10.1109/IGARSS.2001.978191.
  • Le HD, Smith C, Herbohn J, Harrison S. 2012. More than just trees: assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries. Journal of Rural Studies. 28(1):5–19. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.006.
  • Lord of the Trees. 2022. New challenges an altered world. Sydney (Australia): Lord of the Trees. https://lordofthetrees.ai/.
  • Lysych M, Bukhtoyarov L, Druchinin D. 2021. Design and research sowing devices for aerial sowing of forest seeds with UAVs. Inventions. 6(4):83. doi:10.3390/inventions6040083.
  • Madsen MD, Kostka SJ, Inouye AL, Zvirzdin DL. 2012. Postfire restoration of soil hydrology and wildland vegetation using surfactant seed coating technology. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 65(3):253–259. doi:10.2111/REM-D-11-00083.1.
  • Masarei M, Guzzomi AL, Merritt DJ, Erickson TE. 2019. Factoring restoration practitioner perceptions into future design of mechanical direct seeders for native seeds. Restoration Ecology. 27(6):1251–1262. doi:10.1111/rec.13001.
  • Michez A, Piégay H, Lisein J, Claessens H, Lejeune P. 2016. Classification of riparian forest species and health condition using multi-temporal and hyperspatial imagery from unmanned aerial system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 188(3):146–146. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4996-2.
  • Mohan M, de Mendonça BAF, Silva CA, Klauberg C, de Saboya Ribeiro as, de Araújo EJG, Monte MA, Cardil A. 2019. Optimizing individual tree detection accuracy and measuring forest uniformity in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) plantations using airborne laser scanning. Ecological Modelling. 409:108736. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108736.
  • Mohan M, Leite RV, Broadbent EN, Jaafar WSWM, Srinivasan S, Bajaj S, Corte APD, Do Amaral CH, Gopan G, Saad SNM, et al. 2021. Individual tree detection using UAV-lidar and UAV-SfM data: a tutorial for beginners. Open Geosciences. 13(1): 1028–1039. doi:10.1515/geo-2020-0290.
  • Mohan M, Richardson G, Gopan G, Aghai MM, Bajaj S, Galgamuwa GAP, Vastaranta M, Arachchige PSP, Amorós L, Corte APD, et al. 2021. UAV-supported forest regeneration: current trends, challenges and implications. Remote Sensing. 13(13):2596. doi:10.3390/rs13132596.
  • Murphy S. 2022 June 19. Giant drone planting 40,000 tree pods a day in Australian Botanic Garden at Mt Annan. Australian Broadcast Network News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-19/giant-drones-dropping-tree-seeds/101150496.
  • Nasiri V, Darvishsefat AA, Arefi H, Pierrot-Deseilligny M, Namiranian M, Le Bris A. 2021. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)-based canopy height modeling under leaf-on and leaf-off conditions for determining tree height and crown diameter (case study: Hyrcanian mixed forest). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 51(7):962–971. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0125.
  • Nature Climate Change. 2020. In the line of fire. Nature Climate Change. 10(3):169. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0720-5.
  • NRM Board. 2011. Direct seeding. NRM Fact Sheet. 4(4):1.
  • Pedrini S, Lewandrowski W, Stevens JC, Dixon KW, Pritchard H. 2019. Optimising seed processing techniques to improve germination and sowability of native grasses for ecological restoration. Plant Biology. 21(3):415–424. doi:10.1111/plb.12885.
  • Pedrini S, Merritt DJ, Stevens J, Dixon K. 2017. Seed coating: science or marketing spin? Trends in Plant Science. 22(2):106–116. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.11.002.
  • Porter SS. 2013. Adaptive divergence in seed color camouflage in contrasting soil environments. The New Phytologist. 197(4):1311–1320. doi:10.1111/nph.12110.
  • Ryan JC, Hubbard AL, Box JE, Todd J, Christoffersen P, Carr JR, Holt TO, Snooke N. 2015. UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet. The Cryosphere. 9(1):1–11. doi:10.5194/tc-9-1-2015.
  • Santos AAD, Marcato J Jr,Araujo, MS, di Martini, DR, Tetila, EC, Siqueira, HL, Aoki C, Eltner A, Matsubara, ET, Pistori H, et al. 2019. Assessment of CNN-based methods for individual tree detection on images captured by RGB cameras attached to UAVS. Sensors. 19(16):3595. doi:10.3390/s19163595.
  • Seedcopter. 2023. Reforestation made Scalable. Telangana (India): Seedcopter. http://seedcopter.com/.
  • Stelzer H. 2019. How to plant forest tree seedlings. Columbia (MO): Extension, University of Missouri. https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g5008.
  • Strecha C, Fletcher A, Lechner A, Erskine P, Fua P. 2012. Developing species specific vegetation maps using multi-spectral hyperspatial imagery from unmanned aerial vehicles. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 1:311–316. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-I-3-311-2012.
  • Thackway R, Lesslie R. 2008. Describing and mapping human-induced vegetation change in the Australian landscape. Environmental Management. 42(4):572–590. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9131-5.
  • Turner SR, Pearce B, Rokich DP, Dunn RR, Merritt DJ, Majer JD, Dixon KW. 2006. Influence of polymer seed coatings, soil raking, and time of sowing on seedling performance in post-mining restoration. Restoration Ecology. 14(2):267–277. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00129.x.
  • United Nations Department of Global Communications. n.d. The 17 goals. New York: UN Department of Global Communications. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
  • Velasquez-Camacho L, Cardil A, Mohan M, Etxegarai M, Anzaldi G, de Miguel S. 2021. Remotely sensed tree characterization in urban areas: a review. Remote Sensing. 13(23):4889. doi:10.3390/rs13234889.
  • Wan-Mohd-Jaafar WS, Woodhouse IH, Silva CA, Omar H, Hudak AT. 2017. Modelling individual tree aboveground biomass using discrete return lidar in lowland dipterocarp forest of Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 29(4):465–484. doi:10.26525/jtfs2017.29.4.465484.
  • Winsen MHG, Hamilton G. 2023. A comparison of UAV-derived dense point clouds using LiDAR and NIR photogrammetry in an Australian eucalypt forest. Remote Sensing. 15(6):1694. doi:10.3390/rs15061694.
  • Witt RR, Beranek CT, Howell LG, Ryan SA, Clulow J, Jordan NR, Denholm B, Roff A, Crowther MS. 2020. Real-time drone derived thermal imagery outperforms traditional survey methods for an arboreal forest mammal. Public Library of Science ONE. 15(11):e0242204. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242204.
  • Woodget AS, Carbonneau PE, Visser F, Maddock IP. 2015. Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 40(1):47–64. doi:10.1002/esp.3613.
  • World Wildlife Fund Australia. 2018. Koala forever. Sydney (Australia): World Wildlife Fund. https://wwf.org.au/what-we-do/help-regenerate-australia/koalas-forever/.
  • Yurtseven H, Akgul M, Coban S, Gulci S. 2019. Determination and accuracy analysis of individual tree crown parameters using UAV based imagery and OBIA techniques. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation. 145:651–664. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.092.
  • Zhou X, Zhang X. 2020. Individual tree parameters estimation for plantation forests based on UAV oblique photography. IEEE Access. 8:96184–96198. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994911.