A qualitative investigation into perceptions of scientist-practitioner competence within supervision during psychology training programmes

References

• Baker, D. B., & Benjamin, L. T. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist practitioner: A look back at boulder. The American Psychologist, 55(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Shires, A. (2020). Evidence‐based practice within supervision during psychology practitioner training: A systematic review. The Clinical Psychologist, 24(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, S. K., Schneiderman, R. L., & Zoloth, E. (2017). Building an evidence base for effective supervision practices: An analogue experiment of supervision to increase EBT fidelity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135246581700011X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belar, C. D. (2000). Scientist-practitioner ≠ science + practice: Boulder is bolder. The American Psychologist, 55(2), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. The American Psychologist, 41(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.71
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. L., & Kerr, B. (1993). Counseling psychology and the scientist practitioner model: Implementation and implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 21(1), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000093211008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieschke, K. J., Fouad, N. A., Collins, F. L., Jr., & Halonen, J. S. (2004). The scientifically minded psychologist: Science as a core competency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(7), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, F. L., Crowe, T. P., & Grenyer, B. F. (2016). Dialogical reflexivity in supervision: An experiential learning process for enhancing reflective and relational competencies. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2015.1135840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, F. L., Deane, F. P., Crowe, T. P., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2018). Supervisor perceptions of relational competence: Core components and developmental considerations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., & Turpin, G. (2007). Clinical psychology trainees’ research productivity and publications: An initial survey and contributing factors. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, K. M., & Perry, K. E. (2014). Bringing theory to life for trainees in professional psychology: The role of setting, assignments, and supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor, M. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., Creaner, M., Hutman, H., & Timulak, L. (2015). A comparative study of clinical supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falender, C. A., Cornish, J. A. E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N. J., Leventhal, G., Shafranske, E., Sigmon, S. T., Stoltenberg, C., & Grus, C. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(7), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad, N. A., Grus, C. L., Hatcher, R. L., Kaslow, N. J., Hutchings, P. S., Madson, M. B., Collins, F. L., & Crossman, R. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4S), S5–S26. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudiano, B. A., & Statler, M. A. (2001). The scientist-practitioner gap and graduate education: Integrating perspectives and looking forward. The Clinical Psychologist, 54(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/e533162009-004
   Google Scholar
• Genuchi, M. C., Rings, J. A., Germek, M. D., & Cornish, J. A. E. (2015). Clinical supervisors’ perceptions of the clarity and comprehensiveness of the supervision competencies framework. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalvez, C. J., Brockman, R., & Hill, H. R. (2016). Video feedback in CBT supervision: Review and illustration of two specific techniques. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 9(e–24), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X1500029X
   Google Scholar
• Gonsalvez, C. J., & Crowe, T. P. (2014). Evaluation of psychology practitioner competence in clinical supervision. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 68(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.2.177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonsalvez, C. J., Deane, F. P., Blackman, R., Matthias, M., Knight, R., Nasstasia, Y., Shires, A., Nicholson-Perry, K., Allan, C., & Bliokas, V. (2015). The hierarchical clustering of clinical psychology practicum competencies: A multisite study of supervisor ratings. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, R. K., Borders, L. D., Chang, C. Y., Guiffrida, D. A., Hutman, H., Kemer, G., Watkins, C. E., & White, E. (2016). Prioritizing questions and methods for an international and interdisciplinary supervision research agenda: Suggestions by eight scholars. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 117–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2016.1153991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiney, M. C., & Newman, D. S. (2021). A grounded theory of model school psychology internship supervision. School Psychology Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1946379
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Kasujja, R., & Oakes, P. (2015). Clinical supervision for clinical psychology students in Uganda: An initial qualitative exploration. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9(1), 24, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0016-8
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill, G. W., McEntarffer, R., Mehrotra, C., Nesmith, R., Weaver, K. A., & Whitlock, K. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3003_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, T., & Amos, I. (2017). The scientist-practitioner and the reflective-practitioner. In Counselling Psychology (pp. 167–182). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626499-11
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. L., Fouad, N. A., Campbell, L. F., McCutcheon, S. R., Grus, C. L., & Leahy, K. L. (2013). Competency-based education for professional psychology: Moving from concept to practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(4), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershenberg, R., Drabick, D. A. G., & Vivian, D. (2012). An opportunity to bridge the gap between clinical research and clinical practice: Implications for clinical training. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, R. A., McGowan, M. R., Mitchell, D. R., Mellott, R. N., Lilly, K., & Martinez, L. (2007). A pilot study examining the longer term stability of the scientist-practitioner model of training. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206297580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, R. A., Troyer, J. A., Hall, E. J., Mellott, R. N., Coté, L. S., & Marquis, J. D. (2007). The scientist-practitioner model: A rose by any other name is still a rose. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206296459
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. L., & Mehr, S. L. (2007). Foundations and assumptions of the scientist practitioner model. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206296454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, F. H. (1990). The scientist-practitioner connection: A bridge in need of constant attention. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 21(4), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.21.4.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangos, K. A., Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Corp, D. A., Hutman, H., Gibson, A., & Nicolas, A. I. (2018). American Psychological Association guidelines for clinical supervision: Competency-based implications for supervisees. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(7), 821–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018807128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins, F. L., Jr., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., Nelson, P. D., Rallo, J. S., Vasquez, M. J. T., & Willmuth, M. E. (2004). Competencies conference: Future directions in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(7), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaslow, N. J., Grus, C. L., Campbell, L. F., Fouad, N. A., Hatcher, R. L., & Rodolfa, E. R. (2009). Competency Assessment Toolkit for professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4S), S27–S45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaslow, N. J., Rubin, N. J., Forrest, L., Elman, N. S., Van Horne, B. A., Jacobs, S. C., Huprich, S. K., Benton, S. A., Pantesco, V. F., Dollinger, S. J., Grus, C. L., Behnke, S. H., Miller, D. S. S., Shealy, C. N., Mintz, L. B., Schwartz-Mette, R., Van Sickle, K., & Thorn, B. E. (2007). Recognizing, assessing, and intervening with problems of professional competence. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 38(5), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns, R. D., Berry, S., Frantsve, L. M. E., & Linton, J. C. (2009). Life-Long competency development in clinical health psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
   Google Scholar
• Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301
   Google Scholar
• Melchert, T. P., Berry, S., Grus, C., Arora, P., De Los Reyes, A., Hughes, T. L., Moye, J., Oswald, F. L., & Rozensky, R. H. (2019). Applying task force recommendations on integrating science and practice in health service psychology education. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(4), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, D. L., & James, I. A. (2002). The observed impact of training on competence in clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466502163796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, K., Wong Yuh Ju, P., & Tsui, M.-S. (2018). Constructing an evidence informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691.457.2017.1341387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, J. G. (2001). The scientist-practitioner model and its critics. Australian Psychologist, 36(2), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060108259649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2010). Ten criteria to qualify as a scientist-practitioner in clinical psychology: An immodest proposal for objective standards. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-009-9127-3
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2015). Training the scientist–practitioner in the twenty-first century: A risk–benefit analysis. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 28(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1052779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owenz, M., & Hall, S. R. (2011). Bridging the research-practice gap in psychotherapy training: Qualitative analysis of master’s students’ experiences in a student-led research and practice team. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C., & Laird, V. (2015). The scientist–practitioner model in counseling psychology programs: A survey of training directors. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 28(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1047440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rings, J. A., Genuchi, M. C., Hall, M. D., Angelo, M. A., & Cornish, J. A. E. (2009). Is there consensus among predoctoral internship training directors regarding clinical supervision competencies? A descriptive analysis. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(3), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodolfa, E., Bent, R., Eisman, E., Nelson, P., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A cube model for competency development: Implications for psychology educators and regulators. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 36(4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. (2007). Trustworthiness criteria. In T. Schwandt (Ed.), The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (pp. 299–300). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/97814129862681.n354
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. B. (1967). Clinical psychology as an applied science. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 113(502), 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.113.502.1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. (2002). Renewing the scientist-practitioner model. Psychologist-Leicester, 15(5), 232–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, C. D., & Pace, T. M. (2007). The scientist-practitioner model: Now more than ever. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-007-9054-0
   Google Scholar
• Stricker, G. (2002). What is a scientist-practitioner anyway? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(10), 1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Treuer, K. M., & Reynolds, N. (2017). A competency model of psychology practice: Articulating complex skills and practices. Frontiers in Education, 2(54), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00054
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2008). Focus groups. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 186–206). Sage.
   Google Scholar