References
- Shaver, P., Lessons from the Harrisburg conspiracy trial. Presented at Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Montreal, August, 1973.
- Adkins, J. C., 1969. "Jury selection: An art? A science? Or luck?". In: Trial Magazine. 1969. pp. 37–39.
- Australian Cities Commission., 1975. Brisbane at the census, 1971. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1975.
- Berk, R. A., Hennessy, M., and Swan, J., 1977. The vagaries and vulgarities of ‘scientific’ jury selection, a methodological evaluation, Evaluation Quarterly 1 (1977), pp. 143–158.
- Campbell, S., 1972. The multiple functions of the criminal defense voir dire in Texas, American Journal of Criminal Law 1 (1972), p. 225.
- Congalton, A. A., 1969. Status and prestige in Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire; 1969.
- Hale, J., 1973. Juries: The West Australian experience, Western Australian Law Review 11 (1973), pp. 99–104.
- Hayes, H. B., 1972. Applying persuasive techniques to trial proceedings, South Carolina Law Review 24 (1972), p. 380.
- Katz, L. S., 1969. "The twelve man jury". In: Trial Magazine. 1969. pp. 39–42.
- Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H., 1975. Statistical package for the social sciences, . New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975.
- Schulman, J., Shaver, P., Coleman, R., Embrich, B., and Christie, R., 1973. Recipe for a jury, Psychology Today (U.S.) 6 (1973), pp. 37–44.
- Tate, E., Hawrish, E., and Clark, S., 1974. Communication variables injury selection., Journal of Communication (1974), pp. 130–139, Summer.