Predicting territory density of Dusky Orange-crowned Warblers Oreothlypis celata sordida breeding on Santa Catalina Island, California

REFERENCES

• Adams, D.E. & Anderson, R.C. 1980. Species response to a moisture gradient in central Illinois forests. Am. J. Bot. 67: 381–392. doi: 10.2307/2442348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, H.L. 2004. Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS. Available at http://www.spatialecology.com/htools
   Google Scholar
• Block, W.M. & Brennan, L.A. 1993. The habitat concepts in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr. Ornithol. 11: 35–91. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9912-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Bollinger, E. 1995. Successional changes and habitat selection in hayfield bird communities. Auk 112: 720–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L.J., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall, Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. & Thomas, L. 2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, M.L. 1978. Habitat selection and interspecific territoriality among the sylviid warblers in England and Sweden. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 351–396. doi: 10.2307/2937239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déath, G. & Fabricius, K.E. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81: 3178–3192. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, R.C., Sillett, T.S., Rodenhouse, N.L. & Holmes, R.T. 2007. Population density affects foraging behavior of male black-throated blue warblers during the breeding season. J. Field Ornithol. 78: 133–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2007.00096.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R.J., Huettmann, F., Leathwick, J.R., Lehmann, A., Li, J., Lohmann, L.G., Loiselle, B.A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J.M., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, S.J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R.E., Soberón, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M.S. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estep, L.K., Mays, H., Keyser, A.J. Jr., Ballentine, B. & Hill, G.E. 2005. Effects of breeding density and plumage coloration on mate guarding and cuckoldry in blue grosbeaks (Passerina caerulea). J. Can. Zool. 83: 1143–1148. doi: 10.1139/z05-110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z., Kabrick, J.M. & Shifley, S.R. 2006. Classification and regression tree based survival analysis in oak-dominated forests of Missouri's Ozark highlands. Can. J. Forest Res. 36: 1740–1748. doi: 10.1139/x06-068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R.G. & Myers, J.P. 1981. An evaluation and comparison of techniques for estimating home range and territory size. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 461–465.
   Google Scholar
• Forstmeier, W., Bourski, O.V. & Leisler, B. 2001. Habitat choice in Phylloscopus warblers: the role of morphology, phylogeny and competition. Oecologia 128: 566–576. doi: 10.1007/s004420100678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, G.A., Round, P.D., Pierce, A.J., Nimnuan, S., Pattanavibool, A. & Brockelman, W.Y. 2009. A field test of distance sampling methods for a tropical forest bird community. Auk 126: 439–448. doi: 10.1525/auk.2009.08087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goward, S.N. & Huemmrich, K.F. 1992. Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index: an assessment using the SAIL model. Remote Sens. Environ. 39: 119–140. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90131-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildlife Manage. 47: 893–901. doi: 10.2307/3808148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Horne, B. & Weins, J.A. 1991. Forest bird suitability models and the development of general habitat models. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Research Report 8, pp. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, B.M., Yoon, J., Ghalambor, C.K., Moore, I.T. & Sillett, T.S. 2010. Seasonal and population variation in male testosterone levels in breeding orange-crowned warblers (Vermivora celata). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 168: 333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, G.F. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearbook Cartogr. 7: 186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71. doi: 10.2307/1937156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.J. 2000. Evaluation of an arthropod sampling techniques for measuring food availability for forest insectivorous birds. J. Field Ornithol. 71: 88–109. doi: 10.1648/0273-8570-71.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.D. & Sherry, T.W. 2001. Effects of food availability on the distribution of migratory warblers among habitats in Jamaica. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 546–560. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118: 557–562. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0557:HSSIAE]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J.E. 2006. South coast bioregion. In Sugihari, N.G., van Wangtendonk, J.W., Shaffer, K.E., Fites-Kaufman, J., and Thoede, A.E. (eds.) Fires in California's Ecosystem, 350. University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, E.M., Gray, B.R., Fox, T.J. & Thogmartin, W.E. 2007. Breeding bird territory placement in riparian wet meadows in relation to invasive reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinacea. Wetlands 27: 644–655. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[644:BBTPIR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, D.A. 2002. The status of island scrub-oak (Quercus pacifica) on Catalina Island, California. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-184.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, D.A. 2005. Vegetation community mapping on Santa Catalina Island using orthorectification and GIS. In Garcelon, D.K. & Schwemm, C.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth California Islands Symposium, 193–203. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Ventura, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M. & Monteith, J.L. 1982. Remote sensing of plant growth. In Smith, H. (ed.) Plants and the Daylight Spectrum, 133–144. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Langin, K.M., Sillett, T.S., Yoon, J., Sofaer, H.R., Morrison, S.A. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2009. Reproductive consequences of an extreme drought for orange-crowned warblers on Santa Catalina and Santa Cruz Islands. In Damiani, C.C. & Garcelon, D.K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh California Islands Symposium, 293–300. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Ventura, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J.F. & Johnson, N.K. 1974. Turnover and equilibria in insular avifaunas, with special reference to the California Channel Islands. Condor 76: 370–384. doi: 10.2307/1365812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M.R. & Cooper, R.J. 2004. Territory size of a migratory songbird in response to caterpillar density and foliage structure. Ecology 85: 432–445. doi: 10.1890/02-0548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnich, R.A. 1980. Vegetation of Santa Cruz and Santa Catalina Islands. In Power, D. M. (ed.) The California Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium, 123–138. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, S.A. & Bolger, D.T. 2002. Variation in a sparrow's reproductive success with rainfall: food and predator-mediated processes. Oecologia 133: 315–324. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1040-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra, H. 2001. Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. Int. J. Remote Sens. 22: 2377–2400. doi: 10.1080/01431160117096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nice, M.M. 1941. The role of territory in bird life. Am. Midland Nat. 26: 441–487. doi: 10.2307/2420732
   Google Scholar
• Pettorelli, N., Vik, J.O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.M., Tucker, C.J. & Stenseth, N.C. 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyle, P. 1997. Identification Guide to North American Birds – Part 1. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, B.D. 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Root, T. 1988. Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology 69: 330–339. doi: 10.2307/1940431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonher, T. & Nicholson, S.E. 1989. The relationship between California rainfall and ENSO events. J. Climate 2: 1258–1269. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1258:TRBCRA>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M. & Shugart, H.H. 1987. Territory size variation in the ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. Ecology 68: 695–704. doi: 10.2307/1938475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofaer, H.R., Chapman, P.L., Sillett, T.S. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2013. Advantages of nonlinear mixed models for fitting avian growth curves. J. Avian Biol. 44: 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogge, M.K., Gilbert, W.M. & Riper, C.V. III. 1994. Orange-crowned warbler (Vermivora celata). In Poole, A. & Gill, F. (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 101. Academy of Natural Sciences and American Ornithologists’ Union, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, J.A. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am. Nat. 131: 329–347. doi: 10.1086/284793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhonen, J., Norrdahl, K. & Korpimaki, E. 1994. Avian predation risk modifies breeding bird community on a farmland area. Ecology 75: 1626–1634. doi: 10.2307/1939623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therneau, T.M. & Atkinson, E.J. 1997. An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. Technical report, Mayo Foundation. [Distributed in PostScript with the RPART package].
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., Laake, J.L., Rexstad, E., Strindberg, S., Marques, F.F.C., Buckland, S.T., Borchers, D.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Burt, M.L., Hedley, S.L., Pollard, J.H., Bishop, J.R.B. & Marques, T.A. 2009. Distance 6.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment. University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews. Available at http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A.D. 2001. Topographic positions and landforms analysis (conference poster). ESRI International User Conference. San Diego, CA, 9–13 July.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Sillett, T.S., Morrison, S.A. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2012. Breeding density, not life history, predicts interpopulation differences in territorial aggression in a passerine bird. Anim. Behav. 84: 515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Sillett, T.S., Morrison, S.A. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2013. Male's return rate, rather than territory fidelity and breeding dispersal, explains geographic variation in song sharing in two populations of an oscine passerine (Oreothlypis celata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 1691–1697. doi: 10.1007/s00265-013-1579-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar