Song function and territoriality in male and female White-throated Dippers Cinclus cinclus

References

• Barton, K. 2016. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R Package Version 0.12.2/r18. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/mumin/.
   Google Scholar
• Beletsky, L. 1982. Aggressive response to ‘self’ songs by female Red-winged Blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Can. J. Zool. 61: 462–465. doi: 10.1139/z83-062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, D.H. & Li, X. 2006. The song structure and seasonal patterns of vocal behavior of male and female bellbirds (Anthornis melanura). J. Ethol. 24: 17–25. doi: 10.1007/s10164-005-0155-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, D.H., Evans, B., Cope, T. & Ji, W. 2008. A test of the dear enemy hypothesis in female New Zealand bellbirds (Anthornis melanura): female neighbors as threats. Behav. Ecol. 19: 791–798. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, K.L. & Catchpole, C.K. 1997. Female choice in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc. R. Soc. B 264: 521–526. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D.M. & Newton, A.V. 1996. Dominance and survival of Dippers Cinclus cinclus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 173–181. doi: 10.1007/s002650050230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K.E. 2014. Mates of competitive females: the relationships between female aggression, mate quality and parental care. Adv. Zool. 2014: 319567. doi: 10.1155/2014/319567
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K.E. & Langmore, N.E. 2015. Female and male song rates across breeding stage: testing for sexual and nonsexual functions of female song. Anim. Behav. 109: 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74: 149–166. doi: 10.1163/156853980X00366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C.K. 1996. Song and female choice: good genes and big brains? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 358–360. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)30042-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J.B. 1995. Bird Song, 1st edn. Cambridge Universty Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J.B. 2008. Bird Song-Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, S.A. 1985. Non-breeding territoriality of Dippers (Cinclus cinclus) and the influence of environmental conditions on their behaviour. Undergrad Thesis, University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Farabaugh, S.M. 1982. The ecological and social significance of duetting. In Kroodsma, D.E. & Miller, E.H. (eds) Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2: 85–124. Cornell University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Geberzahn, N., Goymann, W., Muck, C. & ten Cate, C. 2009. Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 193–204. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0836-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M.L. & Langmore, N.E. 2017. Fitness costs and benefits of female song. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5: 6–8. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. & Peters, A. 2008. Coordination between the sexes for territorial defence in a duetting fairy-wren. Anim. Behav. 76: 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, S.M., Stoddard, P.K. & Arcese, P. 1989. Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Anim. Behav. 37: 266–273. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90115-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelzel, A.R. 1986. Song characteristics and response to playback of male and female Robins Erithacus rubecula. Ibis 128: 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1986.tb02098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurvich, C.M. & Tsai, C. 1989. Biometrika trust regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76: 297–307. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer, S., Evans, C. & Mahr, K. 2016. Female in-nest chatter song increases predation. Biol. Lett. 12: 18–21. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koloff, J. & Mennill, D. 2011. Aggressive responses to playback of solos and duets in a Neotropical antbird. Anim. Behav. 82: 587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, C.A. & Getty, T. 2016. Not just for males: females use song against male and female rivals in a temperate zone songbird. Anim. Behav. 113: 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A.A. 1986. Male quality, reproduction, and survival in the Great Tit (Parus major). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 57–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00303843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore, N.E. 1998. Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 136–140. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01241-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore, N. & Davies, N. 1997. Female dunnocks use vocalizations to compete for males. Anim. Behav. 53: 881–890. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattin, C. & Ritchison, G. 2009. Intra- and intersexual functions of singing by male Blue Grosbeaks: the role of within- song variation. W. J. Ornithol. 121: 714–721. doi: 10.1676/09-026.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue, D.M. & Krupp, D.B. 2016. Duetting as a collective behavior. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4: 7. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoolagan, L., Mawby, P., Whitehead, F. & Sharp, S.P. In press. The structure and context of male and female song in dippers. J. Ornithol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manica, L.T., Maia, R., Dias, A., Podos, J. & Macedo, R.H. 2014. Vocal output predicts territory quality in a neotropical songbird. Behav. Processes 109: 21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, P.K., Krebs, J.R. & Perrins, C.M. 1981. Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the Great Tit (Parus major). Am. Soc. Nat. 118: 149–159. doi: 10.1086/283811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennill, D.J. 2006. Aggressive responses of male and female rufous-and-white wrens to stereo duet playback. Anim. Behav. 71: 219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, E.S. 1996. A comparison of vocal behaviour among tropical and temperate passerine birds. In Kroodsma, D.E. & Miller, E.H. (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, 258–268. Cornell University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Najar, N. & Benedict, L. 2015. Female song in New World Wood-Warblers (Parulidae). Front. Ecol. Evol. 3: 139. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom, K.J. & Benedict, L. 2018. A call to document female bird songs: applications for diverse fields. Auk 135: 314–325. doi: 10.1642/AUK-17-183.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom, K.J., Hall, M.L., Riebel, K., Omland, K.E. & Langmore, N.E. 2014. Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nat. Commun. 5: 3379. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øigarden, T., Borge, T. & Lifjeld, J.T. 2010. Extrapair paternity and genetic diversity: the white-throated dipper Cinclus cinclus. J. Avian Biol. 41: 248–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04847.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, D.A., Crawford, P.W., Macdougall-Shackleton, S.A. & MacDougall-Shackleton, E.A. 2013. Song repertoire size, not territory location, predicts reproductive success and territory tenure in a migratory songbird. Can. J. Zool. 93: 627–633. doi: 10.1139/cjz-2015-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J., Yunes-Jiménez, L., Osorio-Beristain, M., Omland, K.E. & Murphy, T.G. 2008. Sex-role reversal in song? Females sing more frequently than males in the Streak-Backed Oriole. Condor 110: 387–392. doi: 10.1525/cond.2008.8430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team and R Development Core Team, R. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, edited by R. D. C. Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing), Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, P. and Mann, N. 2004. Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics? J. Avian Biol. 35: 289–294. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, R. 1993. Avisoft SAS Lab pro version 5.2. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, J.A., Sheard, C., Seddon, N., Meade, A., Cotton, A.J. & Nakagawa, S. 2016. Territoriality, social bonds, and the evolution of communal signaling in birds. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4: 74. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp, S.M. & Mennill, D. J. 2008. Seasonal variation in the duetting behaviour of rufous-and-white wrens (Thryothorus rufalbus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1107–1117. doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0538-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, S.J. & Ormerod, S.J. 1994. The Dippers. First. T & AD Poyser Ltd., Calton, Staffordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Villain, A.S., Mahamoud-Issa, M., Doligez, B. & Vignal, C. 2017. Vocal behaviour of mates at the nest in the White-throated Dipper Cinclus cinclus: contexts and structure of vocal interactions, pair-specific acoustic signature. J. Ornithol. 158: 897–910. doi: 10.1007/s10336-017-1449-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, W.H., Brunton, D.H., Aguirre, J.D., Thomas, D.B., Valcu, M. & Dale, J. 2016. Female song occurs in songbirds with more elaborate female coloration and reduced sexual dichromatism. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4: 22. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasukawa, K. & Searcy, W.A. 1982. Blackbirds : aggression in female red-winged a strategy to ensure male parental investment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 13–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00297660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A.A. & Smith, G.M. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar