Different nest predator guild associated with egg size in the Patagonian temperate forest

References

• Aizen, M.A. & Ezcurra, C. 1998. High incidence of plant-animal mutualisms in the woody flora of the temperate forest of southern South America: biogeographical origin and present ecological significance. Ecología Austral 8: 217–236.
   Google Scholar
• Amico, G.C. & Aizen, M.A. 2005. Dispersión de semillas por aves en un bosque templado de Sudamérica austral:¿ quién dispersa a quién?. Ecología Austral 15: 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Amico, G. C., Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A. & Aizen, M.A. 2009. The potential key seed-dispersing role of the arboreal marsupial Dromiciops gliroides. Acta Oecol. 35: 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcese, P., Smith, J. & Hatch, M.I. 1996. Nest predation by cowbirds and its consequences for passerine demography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93: 4608–4611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armesto, J.J., Rozzi, R., Smith-Ramírez, C. & Arroyo, M.T.K. 1998. Conservation targets in South America temperate forest. Science 282: 1271–1272.
   Google Scholar
• Armesto, J.J., Smith-Ramírez, C. & Sabag, C. 1996. The importance of plant-bird mutualisms in the temperate rainforest of Southern South America. In Lawford, R.G., Alaback, P.B. & Fuentes, E.R. (eds) High-latitude Rainforests and Associated Ecosystems of the West Coast of the Americas, 248–265. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brawn, J.D., Angehr, G., Davros, N., Robinson, W.D., Styrsky, J.N. & Tarwater, C.E. 2011. Sources of variation in the nesting success of understory tropical birds. J. Avian Biol. 42: 61–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.04897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, B.R., Talent, L.G. & Engle, D.M. 2007. Effects of olfactory attributes and size of egg on rates of predation of artificial ground nests in tallgrass prairie. The Southwest Nat 52: 453–460. doi: 10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:EOOAAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W.B. & Bollinger, E. 2000. Predation rates on real and artificial nests of grassland birds. Auk 117: 147–153. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0147:PRORAA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGraaf, R. & Maier, T. 1996. Effect of egg size on predation by white-footed mice. Wilson Bull. 108: 535–539.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, S., Griesser, M., Andersson, T. & Ekman, J. 2005. Nest predation and habitat change interact to influence Siberian jay numbers. Oikos 111: 150–158. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faaborg, J. 2004. Truly artificial nest studies. Conserv. Biol. 18: 369–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00486.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontúrbel, F.E., Franco, M., Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., Rivarola, M.D. & Amico, G.C. 2012. Ecological consistency across space: a synthesis of the ecological aspects of Dromiciops gliroides in Argentina and Chile. Naturwiss 99: 873–881. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0969-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, G.R. & Ford, H.A. 2003. Quail eggs, modelling clay eggs, imprints and small mammals in an Australian woodland. Emu 103: 255–258. doi: 10.1071/MU02007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J.P. 1991. Avian nest predation in tropical wet forest: an experimental study. Oikos 60: 155–161. doi: 10.2307/3544861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, D.G. 1995. Forest fragmentation and nest predation: Are experiments with Japanese quail eggs misleading? Auk 112: 767–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyser, A.J., Hill, G.E. & Soehren, E.C. 1998. Effects of forest fragment size, nest density, and proximity to edge on the risk of predation to ground-nesting passerine birds. Conserv. Biol. 12: 986–994. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D.I., DeGraaf, R.M., Griffin, C.R. & Maier, T.J. 1999. Do predation rates on artificial nests accurately reflect predation rates on natural bird nests?(Es Acaso la Tasa de Depredación en Nidos Artificiales un Reflejo de la Tasa de Depredación en Nidos Naturales?). J Field Ornithol 70: 257–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, C. 2000. Egg type influences predation rates in artificial nest experiment. J. Field Ornithol. 71, 16–21. doi: 10.1648/0273-8570-71.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, T.J. & DeGraaf, R.M. 2000. Predation on Japanese quail vs. House Sparrow eggs in artificial nests: small eggs reveal small predators. Condor 102, 325–332. doi: 10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0325:POJQVH]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R.E. 1990. The effect of human observers on the intensity of nest predation. Ibis 132: 608–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R.E. & Kendal, C.E. 1996. The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis 138: 298–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, M.Â. 1997. Predation-mediated bird nest diversity: an experimental test. Can J Zoolog 75, 317–323. doi: 10.1139/z97-040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E. 1988. Processes organizing open-nesting bird assemblages: competition or nest predation? Evol. Ecol. 2, 37–50. doi: 10.1007/BF02071587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E. 1993a. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am. Nat. 141, 897–913. doi: 10.1086/285515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E. 1993b. Nest predation and nest sites. BioScience 43, 523–532. doi: 10.2307/1311947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 101–127. doi: 10.2307/2937160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E. & Clobert, J. 1996. Nest predation and avian life-history evolution in Europe versus North America: a possible role of humans? Am. Nat. 147: 1028–1046. doi: 10.1086/285891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E., Lloyd, P., Bosque, C., Barton, D.C., Biancucci, A.L., Cheng, Y.R. & Ton, R. 2011. Growth rate variation among passerine species in tropical and temperate sites: an antagonistic interaction between parental food provisioning and nest predation risk. Evolution 65: 1607–1622. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01227.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E., Martin, P., Olson, C., Heidinger, B. & Fontaine, J. 2000a. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science 287: 1482–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E., Scott, J. & Menge, C. 2000b. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc Roy Soc London B: Sci-Biol 267: 2287–2293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermoz, M. & Martin, C. 1987. Mapa de vegetación del parque y la Reserva Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Delegación Regional Patagonia. Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica de la Nación. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Mezquida, E.T. & Marone, L. 2001. Factors Affecting nesting success of a bird Assembly in the Central Monte Desert, Argentina. J. Avian Biol. 32: 287–296. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezquida, E.T. & Marone, L. 2002. Microhabitat structure and avian nest predation risk in an open Argentinean woodland: an experimental study. Acta Oecol. 23: 313–320. doi: 10.1016/S1146-609X(02)01160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezquida, E.T. & Marone, L. 2003. Are results of artificial nest experiments a valid indicator of success of natural nests? Wilson Bull. 115: 270–276. doi: 10.1676/02-117
   Google Scholar
• Montevecchi, W.A. 1976. Egg size and the egg predatory behaviour of crows. Behaviour 57: 307–320. doi: 10.1163/156853976X00587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone, J.J. 2015. Biogeographical regionalisation of the Andean region. Zootaxa 3936: 207–236. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3936.2.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C.W.d.S., Almeida, G.P., Paiva, L.V.d. & França, L.F. 2013. Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size. Biota Neotropica 13: 142–146. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032013000100016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, P.W. 1994. The effect of edge on avian nest success: How strong is the evidence? Conserv. Biol. 8: 17–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picman, J., Milks, M.L. & Leptich, M. 1993. Patterns of predation on passerine nests in marshes: effects of water depth and distance from edge. Auk 110: 89–94. doi: 10.2307/4088408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Ricklefs, R. E. 1969. An Analysis of Nesting Mortality in Birds, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S.K., Thompson III, F.R., Donovan, T.M., Whitehead, D.R. & Faaborg, J. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267, 1987–1990. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5206.1987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, J. J. 1992. Nest predation experiments with quail eggs: Too much to swallow? Oikos 65, 528–530. doi: 10.2307/3545570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozzi, R., Martinez, D.R., Willson, M.F. & Sabag C. 1996. Avifauna de los bosques templados de Sudamérica. Capítulo 7 pp. 135–152, en Armesto JJ, C Villagrán & M Kalin Arroyo (eds.) Ecología de los bosques nativos de Chile. Santiago, Editorial Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Sieving, K.E. 1992. Nest predation and differential insular extinction among selected forest birds of central Panama. Ecology 73: 2310–2328. doi: 10.2307/1941477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skutch, A.F. 1985. Clutch size, nesting success, and predation on nests of Neotropical birds, reviewed. Ornithol Monogr 36: 575–594. doi: 10.2307/40168306
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, F.R. & Burhans, D.E. 2004. Differences in predators of artificial and real songbird nests: evidence of bias in artificial nest studies. Conserv. Biol. 18: 373–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, P.M. & Simonetti, J.A. 2003. Forest fragmentation and rhinocryptid nest predation in central Chile. Acta Oecol. 24: 285–288. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2003.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidinger, K. & Kočvara, R. 2010. Repeatability of nest predation in passerines depends on predator species and time scale. Oikos 119: 138–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesołowski, T., Rowiński, P. & Maziarz, M. 2009. Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix: a nomadic insectivore in search of safe breeding grounds? Bird Study 56: 26–33. doi: 10.1080/00063650802681540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcove, D.S. 1985. Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66: 1211–1214. doi: 10.2307/1939174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, M.F., Morrison, J.L., Sieving, K.E., De Santo, T.L., Santisteban, L. & Díaz, I. 2001. Patterns of predation risk and survival of bird nests in a Chilean agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 15, 447–456. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar