Bioacoustic variation in Wren Troglodytes troglodytes populations on Welsh islands

References

• Armstrong, E. A. 1955. The Wren. Collins, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M.C., Baker, M.S. & Baker, E.M. 2003. Rapid evolution of a novel song and an increase in repertoire size in an island population of an Australian songbird. Ibis 145: 465–471. doi: 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M.C., Baker, M.S. & Tilghman, L.M. 2006. Differing effects of isolation on evolution of bird songs: examples from an island-mainland comparison of three species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 89: 331–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00677.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballentine, B., Hyman, J. & Nowicki, S. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Eco. 15: 163–168. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E., Ríos-Chelén, A.A., Gil, D. & Garcia, C.M. 2009. Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour 146: 1269–1286. doi: 10.1163/156853909X423104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E., Ríos-Chelén, A.A., Gil, D. & Garcia, C.M. 2011. Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol. 7: 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Boncoraglio, G. & Saino, N. 2007. Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct. Eco. 21: 134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication, 1st edn, 75–112. Sinauer Associates, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. & Eagle, G. 2019. The Skokholm Annual Report 2018. Wildlife Trust of South and West Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Brumm, H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 434–440. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00814.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm, H. & Naguib, M. 2009. Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song. Adv. Study Behav. 40: 1–33. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G.C. & Atwell, J.W. 2011. On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds. Anim. Behav. 82: 831–836. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C.K. & Slater, P.J. 2003. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations, 1st edn. University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Chappuis, C. 1969. Un cline vocal chez les oiseaux palearctiques: variation tonale des vocalizations, sous differentes latitudes. Alauda 37: 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Cramp, S. (ed) 1988. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Derryberry, E.P., Danner, R.M., Danner, J.E., Derryberry, G.E., Phillips, J.N., Lipshutz, S.E., Gentry, K. & Luther, D.A. 2016. Patterns of song across natural and anthropogenic soundscapes suggest that white-crowned sparrows minimize acoustic masking and maximize signal content. PLoS One 11: e0154456 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derryberry, E.P., Seddon, N., Derryberry, G.E., Claramunt, S., Seeholzer, G.F., Brumfield, R.T. & Tobias, J.A. 2018. Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology. Ecol. Evol. 8: 1890–1905. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doutrelant, C., Aubin, T., Hitier, S. & Lambrechts, M.M. 1998. Two distinct song populations of blue tit Parus caeruleus in the French Mediterranean. Bioacoustics 9: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09524622.1998.9753376
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D. & Wallin, L. 1986. Male bird song attracts females – a field experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 297–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00300645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. & Cruz, A. 2011. Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency. PLoS One 6: e27052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Juricic, E., Poston, R., De Collibus, K., Morgan, T., Bastain, B., Martin, C., Jones, K. & Treminio, R. 2005. Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the western US. Urban Habitats 3: 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G.T. & Gillham, M.E. 1954. Ecology of the Pembrokeshire islands: II. Skokholm, environment and vegetation. J. Ecol. 43: 296–327. doi: 10.2307/2256864
   Google Scholar
• Krause, B.L. 1992. The habitat niche hypothesis: a hidden symphony of animal sounds. Lit. Rev. 36: 40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroodsma, D.E. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn (Eds.), Nature’s Music: the science of birdsong, Vol. 4:  108–131. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kroodsma, D.E., Byers, B.E., Halkin, S.L., Hill, C., Minis, D., Bolsinger, J.R., Dawson, J.A., Donelan, E., Farrington, J., Gill, F.B. & Houlihan, P. 1999. Geographic variation in black-capped chickadee songs and singing behavior. Auk. 116: 387–402. doi: 10.2307/4089373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiolo, P. & Tella, J.L. 2005. Habitat fragmentation affects culture transmission: patterns of song matching in DuPont’s lark. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 1183–1193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther, D. & Baptista, L. 2010. Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc. Royal Soc. B 277: 469–473. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1571
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, A. 1996. The population memetics of birdsong. In D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller (Ed.), Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, 181–197. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdougall-Shackleton, S.A. 1997. Sexual selection and the evolution of song repertoires. In V. Nolan, E. D. Ketterson, & C. F. Thompson (Eds.), Current Ornithology, 81–124. Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P.R. & Martin, T.E. 2001. Behavioral interactions between coexisting species: song playback experiments with wood warblers. Ecol. 82: 207–218. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0207:BIBCSS]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, S. & Searcy, W.A. 2005. Song and mate choice in birds: how the development of behavior helps us understand function. Auk. 122: 1–14. doi: 10.1093/auk/122.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K.A. & Laurence, J. 2008. Translocation of North Island saddleback Philesturnus rufusater from Tiritiri Matangi Island to Motuihe Island, New Zealand. Conserv. Evid. 5: 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K.A., Anderson, M.J., Jenkins, P.F. & Brunton, D.H. 2012. The effects of translocation-induced isolation and fragmentation on the cultural evolution of bird song. Ecol. Lett. 15: 778–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01797.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos, J. & Nowicki, S. 2004. Beaks, adaptation, and vocal evolution in Darwin’s finches. Bioscience 54: 501–510. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0501:BAAVEI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 353: 251–260. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ross-Smith, V.H., Conway, G.J., Facey, R.J., Bailey, B.H., Lipton, M., Whitfield, S.A. & Ferns, P.N. 2013. Population size, ecology and movements of gulls breeding on Flat Holm Island. Birds in Wales 10: 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, G. & Luksenburg, J.A. 2015. Declining rates of species described per taxonomist: slowdown of progress or a side-effect of improved quality in taxonomy? Syst. Biol. 64: 144–151. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searcy, W.A. & Johnson, L.S. 1996. Female attraction to male song in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behaviour 133: 357–366. doi: 10.1163/156853996X00495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H. & den Boer-Visser, A. 2006. Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Bio. 16: 2326–2331. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T.B. 2002. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357: 493–503. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G.V.F. 2008. The Natural History of Skokholm Island. Trafford Publishing, Bloomingto, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, M.R., Seddon, N. & Safran, A.J. 2013. Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X.J. & Slabbekoorn, H. 2014. Timing vocal behavior: lack of temporal overlap avoidance to fluctuating noise levels in singing Eurasian wrens. Behav. Process. 108: 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A., Ieno, E.N. & Smith, G.M. 2007. Analyzing Ecological Data. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar