Challenges in quantifying the responses of Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla to habitat variables and local stressors due to individual variation

References

• Avgar, T., Potts, J.R., Lewis, M.A. & Boyce, M.S. 2016. Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7: 619–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, P., Strøm, H., Bêty, J., Steen, H., Kohler, J., Vihtakari, M., Van Pelt, W., Yoccoz, N.G., Hop, H., Harris, S.M., Patrick, S.C., Assmy, P., Wold, A., Duarte, P., Moholdt, G. & Descamps, S. 2021. Feeding at the front line: interannual variation in the use of glacier fronts by foraging Black-legged Kittiwakes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 677: 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. 2021. IUCN red list for birds.
   Google Scholar
• Bolnick, D.I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J.A., Yang, L.H., Davis, J.M., Hulsey, C.D. & Forister, M.L. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161: 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bost, C.A., Cotté, C., Bailleul, F., Cherel, Y., Charrassin, J.B., Guinet, C., Ainley, D.G. & Weimerskirch, H. 2009. The importance of oceanographic fronts to marine birds and mammals of the southern oceans. J. Mar. Syst. 78: 363–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouten, W., Baaij, E.W., Shamoun-Baranes, J. & Camphuysen, K.C.J. 2013. A flexible GPS tracking system for studying bird behaviour at multiple scales. J. Ornithol. 154: 571–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, J., Wanless, S., Elston, D.A., Daunt, F., Lewis, S. & Harris, M.P. 2004. Local-scale variability in the diet of Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla. Ardea 92: 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, A.E. & Shaffer, S.A. 2008. Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds. Auk 125: 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burthe, S.J., Wanless, S., Newell, M.A., Butler, A. & Daunt, F. 2014. Assessing the vulnerability of the marine bird community in the western North Sea to climate change and other anthropogenic impacts. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 507: 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtt, E.H. 1974. Success of two feeding methods of the Black-legged Kittiwake. Auk 91: 827–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camphuysen, C. 2000. Interactions between the Marine environment, PREdators, and prey: implications for sustainable Sandeel fisheries. IMPRESS Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Camphuysen, K.C.J., Shamoun-Baranes, J., van Loon, E.E. & Bouten, W. 2015. Sexually distinct foraging strategies in an omnivorous seabird. Mar. Biol. 162: 1417–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, M.J., Butler, A., Owen, E., Ewing, S.R., Cole, T., Green, J.A., Soanes, L.M., Arnould, J.P.Y., Newton, S.F., Baer, J., Daunt, F., Wanless, S., Newell, M.A., Robertson, G.S., Mavor, R.A. & Bolton, M. 2015. Effects of sea temperature and stratification changes on seabird breeding success. Clim. Res. 66: 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers, L.S., Lundy, M.G., Colhoun, K., Newton, S.F. & Reid, N. 2012. Diet of Black-legged Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) feeding chicks at two Irish colonies highlights the importance of clupeids. Bird Study 59: 363–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Dalsgaard, S., May, R.F., Barrett, R.T., Langset, M., Sandercock, B.K. & Lorentsen, S.H. 2018. Prevailing weather conditions and diet composition affect chick growth and survival in the Black-legged Kittiwake. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 604: 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A.S.C.P., Humphreys, E.M., Bennet, F., Masden, E.A. & Burton, N.H.K. 2018. Quantifying avian avoidance of offshore wind turbines: current evidence and key knowledge gaps. Mar. Environ. Res. 140: 278–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, J.C. 2011. The Kittiwake. T & AD Poyser, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S.L., Scott, B.E. & Camphuysen, C.J. 2013. Combined spatial and tidal processes identify links between pelagic prey species and seabirds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 479: 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, E.J., Grecian, W.J., Kane, A., Jessopp, M.J. & Quinn, J.L. 2018. Marine protected areas show low overlap with projected distributions of seabird populations in Britain and Ireland. Biol. Conserv. 224: 309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, E.J., Grecian, W.J., Quinn, J.L. & Jessopp, M.J. 2019. Assessing the effectiveness of foraging radius models for seabird distributions using biotelemetry and survey data. Ecography. 42: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Estate Scotland. 2022. The Crown Estate confirms areas selected for 2021/22 marine aggregates tender-round. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/en-gb/media-and-insights/news/2022-the-crown-estate-confirms-areas-selected-for-202122-marine-aggregates-tender-round/ Accessed 31/3/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Daunt, F., Benvenuti, S., Harris, M.P., Dall’Antonia, L., Elston, D. & Wanless, S. 2002. Foraging strategies of the Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla at a North Sea colony: evidence for a maximum foraging range. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 245: 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J.G., Boersch-Supan, P., Clewley, G.D., Humphreys, E.M., O'Hanlon, N.J., Shamoun-Baranes, J., Thaxter, C.B., Weston, E. & Cook, A.S.C.P. 2023. Influence of wind on kittiwake Rissa tridactyla flight and offshore wind turbine collision risk. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T.E., Carneiro, A.P.B., Tarzia, M., Wakefield, E., Hennicke, J.C., Frederiksen, M., Hansen, E.S., Campos, B., Hazin, C., Lascelles, B., Anker-Nilssen, T., Arnardóttir, H., Barrett, R.T., Biscoito, M., Bollache, L., Boulinier, T., Catry, P., Ceia, F.R., Chastel, O., Christensen-Dalsgaard, S., Cruz-Flores, M., Danielsen, J., Daunt, F., Dunn, E., Egevang, C., Fagundes, A.I., Fayet, A.L., Fort, J., Furness, R.W., Gilg, O., González-Solís, J., Granadeiro, J.P., Grémillet, D., Guilford, T., Hanssen, S.A., Harris, M.P., Hedd, A., Huffeldt, N.P., Jessopp, M., Kolbeinsson, Y., Krietsch, J., Lang, J., Linnebjerg, J.F., Lorentsen, S., Madeiros, J., Magnusdottir, E., Mallory, M.L., McFarlane Tranquilla, L., Merkel, F.R., Militão, T., Moe, B., Montevecchi, W.A., Morera-Pujol, V., Mosbech, A., Neves, V., Newell, M.A., Olsen, B., Paiva, V.H., Peter, H., Petersen, A., Phillips, R.A., Ramírez, I., Ramos, J.A., Ramos, R., Ronconi, R.A., Ryan, P.G., Schmidt, N.M., Sigurðsson, I.A., Sittler, B., Steen, H., Stenhouse, I.J., Strøm, H., Systad, G.H.R., Thompson, P., Thórarinsson, T.L., Bemmelen, R.S.A., Wanless, S., Zino, F. & Dias, M.P. 2021. Multispecies tracking reveals a major seabird hotspot in the North Atlantic. Conserv. Lett. 14: e12824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, M.P., Martin, R., Pearmain, E.J., Burfield, I.J., Small, C., Phillips, R.A., Yates, O., Lascelles, B., Borboroglu, P.G. & Croxall, J.P. 2019. Threats to seabirds: a global assessment. Biol. Conserv. 237: 525–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embling, C.B., Illian, J., Armstrong, E., van der Kooij, J., Sharples, J., Camphuysen, K.C.J. & Scott, B.E. 2012. Investigating fine-scale spatio-temporal predator-prey patterns in dynamic marine ecosystems: a functional data analysis approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 49: 481–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard, G.H., Kooij, J.V.D., Bell, E.D., Pinnegar, J.K., Blanchard, J.L., Mackinson, S. & Righton, D.A. 2008. Fishing mortality versus natural predation on diurnally migrating sandeels Ammodytes marinus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 369: 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet). 2022. https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en Accessed 31/3/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Fauchald, P. 2009. Spatial interaction between seabirds and prey: review and synthesis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 391: 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauchald, P. & Tveraa, T. 2003. Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 84: 282–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fijn, R.C., de Jong, J., Courtens, W., Verstraete, H., Stienen, E.W.M. & Poot, M.J.M. 2017. GPS-tracking and colony observations reveal variation in offshore habitat use and foraging ecology of breeding Sandwich Terns. J. Sea Res. 127: 203–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, R.L. 1954. The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in Sedimentary-rock nomenclature. J. Geol. 62: 344–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M., Wanless, S., Harris, M.P., Rothery, P. & Wilson, L.J. 2004. The role of industrial fisheries and oceanographic change in the decline of North Sea Black-legged Kittiwakes. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 1129–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness, R.W. & Birkhead, T.R. 1984. Seabird colony distributions suggest competition for food supplies during the breeding season. Nature 311: 655–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness, R.W., Wade, H.M. & Masden, E.A. 2013. Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. J. Environ. Manage. 119: 56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovart, M., Alejandro, I., Juan, B. & Oro, M.A.D. 2018. Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: the importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24: 1279–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianuca, D., Phillips, R.A., Townley, S. & Votier, S.C. 2017. Global patterns of sex- and age-specific variation in seabird bycatch. Biol. Conserv. 205: 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, N., Fayet, A.L., Padget, O., Syposz, M., Wynn, J., Bond, S., Evry, J., Kirk, H., Shoji, A., Dean, B., Freeman, R. & Guilford, T. 2020. Short-term behavioural impact contrasts with long-term fitness consequences of biologging in a long-lived seabird. Sci. Rep. 10: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grémillet, D. & Boulinier, T. 2009. Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 391: 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grémillet, D., Lewis, S., Drapeau, L., van Der Lingen, C.D., Huggett, J.A., Coetzee, J.C., Verheye, H.M., Daunt, F., Wanless, S. & Ryan, P.G. 2008. Spatial match-mismatch in the Benguela upwelling zone: should we expect chlorophyll and sea-surface temperature to predict marine predator distributions? J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M.P., Bogdanova, M.I., Daunt, F. & Wanless, S. 2012. Using GPS technology to assess feeding areas of Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica. Ringing Migr. 27: 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S.M., Descamps, S., Sneddon, L.U., Bertrand, P., Chastel, O. & Patrick, S.C. 2020. Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 89: 68–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J. 2022. Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.5-15. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, E., Wanless, S. & Bryant, D.M. 2006. Stage-dependent foraging in breeding Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla: distinguishing behavioural responses to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. J. Avian Biol. 37: 436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, G.L., Mehlum, F., Russell, R.W., Irons, D., Decker, M.B. & Becker, P.H. 1999. Physical processes, prey abundance, and the foraging ecology of seabirds. In Adams, N.J. & Slotow, R.H. (eds) Proc. 22 Int. Ornithol. Congr., Durban: 2040–2056, 1–21. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, K. & Watanuki, Y. 2002. Sex and individual differences in foraging behavior of Japanese cormorants in years of different prey availability. J. Ethol. 20: 49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubas, D., Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K., Szeligowska, M., Darecki, M., Boehnke, R., Balazy, K., Trudnowska, E., Kidawa, D., Grissot, A., Descamps, S. & Błachowiak-Samołyk, K. 2022. Gone with the wind – wind speed affects prey accessibility for a High Arctic zooplanktivorous seabird, the little auk Alle alle. Sci. Total Environ. 852: 158533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.S., London, J. & Wilson, K. 2018. Package ‘crawl’. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, D.T., Masden, E.A., Jones, K.B. & Humphreys, E.M. 2022b. Black Guillemot foraging ecology in relation to marine protected area management plans for Northern Ireland. Report to Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute and Marine Scotland Science as part of the Marine Protected Area Management and Monitoring (MarPAMM) project.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, D., Thaxter, C., Boersch-Supan, P., Humphreys, E., Bouten, W., Clewley, G., Scragg, E., Masden, E., Barber, L., Conway, G., Clark, N., Burton, N. & Cook, A. 2022a. Investigating avoidance and attraction responses in lesser black-backed gulls Larus fuscus to offshore wind farms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 686: 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzerka, J., Garthe, S. & Hatch, S.A. 2009. GPS tracking devices reveal foraging strategies of Black-legged Kittiwakes. J. Ornithol. 151: 459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J.V., Spracklen, D.V. & Hamer, K.C. 2019. Effects of windscape on three-dimensional foraging behaviour in a wide-ranging marine predator, the northern gannet. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 628: 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, R., Boulcott, P. & Wright, P. 2021. A verified distribution model for the lesser sandeel Ammodytes marinus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 667: 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Wanless, S., Wright, P.J., Harris, M.P., Bull, J. & Elston, D.A. 2001. Diet and breeding performance of Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla at a North Sea colony. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 221: 277–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, B.T. & Michelot, T. 2021. momentuHMM: R package for generalized hidden Markov models of animal movement. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9: 1518–1530.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, J., Hines, E., Elliott, M., Howar, J., Dransfield, A., Nur, N. & Jahncke, J. 2013. Using seabird habitat modeling to inform Marine Spatial Planning in Central California’s National Marine Sanctuaries. PLoS One 8: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelot, T., Blackwell, P.G. & Matthiopoulos, J. 2019. Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals. Ecology 100: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelot, C., Pinaud, D., Fortin, M., Maes, P., Callard, B., Leicher, M. & Barbraud, C. 2017. Seasonal variation in coastal marine habitat use by the European shag: insights from fine scale habitat selection modeling and diet. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 141: 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. 2009. Composite front maps for improved visibility of dynamic sea-surface features on cloudy SeaWiFS and AVHRR data. J. Mar. Syst. 78: 327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P.I., Scales, K.L., Ingram, S.N., Southall, E.J. & Sims, D.W. 2015. Basking sharks and oceanographic fronts: quantifying associations in the north-east Atlantic. Funct. Ecol. 29: 1099–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOAA. 2009. ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information.
   Google Scholar
• Nussey, D.H., Wilson, A.J. & Brommer, J.E. 2007. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 831–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olin, A.B., Banas, N.S., Wright, P.J., Heath, M.R. & Nager, R.G. 2020. Spatial synchrony of breeding success in the Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla reflects the spatial dynamics of its sandeel prey. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 638: 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orians, G. & Pearson, N. 1979. On the theory of central place foraging. In Horn, D.J., Mitchell, R.D. & Stairs, G.R. (eds) Analysis of Ecological Systems, 154–177. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes, R., Harding, A.M.A., Irons, D.B., Roby, D.D., Suryan, R.M., Orben, R.A., Renner, H., Young, R. & Kitaysky, A. 2012. Proximity to multiple foraging habitats enhances seabirds’ resilience to local food shortages. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 471: 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T.A., Parton, A., Langrock, R., Blackwell, P.G., Thomas, L. & King, R. 2017. Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges. AStA Adv. Stat. Anal. 101: 399–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R.S. 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data: the sp package. R News 5: 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Peschko, V., Mendel, B., Mercker, M., Dierschke, J. & Garthe, S. 2021. Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) are strongly affected by operating offshore wind farms during the breeding season. J. Environ. Manage. 279: 111509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschko, V., Mendel, B., Müller, S., Markones, N., Mercker, M. & Garthe, S. 2020a. Effects of offshore windfarms on seabird abundance: strong effects in spring and in the breeding season. Mar. Environ. Res. 162: 105157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschko, V., Mercker, M. & Garthe, S. 2020b. Telemetry reveals strong effects of offshore wind farms on behaviour and habitat use of common guillemots (Uria aalge) during the breeding season. Mar. Biol. 167: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettex, E., Lorentsen, S.H., Grémillet, D., Gimenez, O., Barrett, R.T., Pons, J.B., Le Bohec, C. & Bonadonna, F. 2012. Multi-scale foraging variability in Northern gannet (Morus bassanus) fuels potential foraging plasticity. Mar. Biol. 159: 2743–2756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R.A., Lewis, S., Gonzalez-Solis, J. & Daunt, F. 2017. Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 578: 117–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
   Google Scholar
• Redfern, C.P.F. & Bevan, R.M. 2014. A comparison of foraging behaviour in the North Sea by Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla from an inland and a maritime colony. Bird Study 61: 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, G.S., Bolton, M., Grecian, W.J. & Monaghan, P. 2014. Inter- and intra-year variation in foraging areas of breeding Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla). Mar. Biol. 161: 1973–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scales, K.L., Miller, P.I., Embling, C.B., Ingram, S.N., Pirotta, E. & Votier, S.C. 2014. Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird. J. R. Soc. Interface 11: 20140679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B.E., Sharples, J., Ross, O.N., Wang, J., Pierce, G.J. & Camphuysen, C.J. 2010. Sub-surface hotspots in shallow seas: fine-scale limited locations of top predator foraging habitat indicated by tidal mixing and sub-surface chlorophyll. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 408: 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signer, J., Fieberg, J. & Avgar, T. 2019. Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecol. Evol. 9: 880–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D.W., Southall, E.J., Humphries, N.E., Hays, G.C., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Pitchford, J.W., James, A., Ahmed, M.Z., Brierley, A.S., Hindell, M.A., Morritt, D., Musyl, M.K., Righton, D., Shepard, E.L.C., Wearmouth, V.J., Wilson, R.P., Witt, M.J. & Metcalfe, J.D. 2008. Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. Nature 451: 1098–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanbury, A., Eaton, M., Aebischer, N., Balmer, D., Brown, A., Douse, A., Mcculloch, N., Noble, D., Win, I. & Harris, A. 2021. The status of our bird populations: the fifth Birds of Conservation Concern in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man and Second IUCN Red List assessment of extinction risk for Great Britain. Br. Birds 114: 723–747.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, I.J., Trathan, P. & Martin, A.R. 2009. Consequences of prey distribution for the foraging behaviour of top predators. In: Boyd, I.L., Wanless, S., & Camphuysen, C.J. (eds). Top Predators in Marine Ecosystems: Their Role in Monitoring and Management, 131–142. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. & Krebs, J. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Thaxter, C.B., Ross-Smith, V.H., Bouten, W., Clark, N.A., Conway, G.J., Rehfisch, M.M. & Burton, N.H.K. 2015. Seabird–wind farm interactions during the breeding season vary within and between years: a case study of lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus in the UK. Biol. Conserv. 186: 347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaxter, C.B., Ross-Smith, V.H., Clark, N.A., Conway, G.J., Wade, H., Masden, E.A., Rehfisch, M.M., Bouten, W. & Niall, H.K. 2012. Measuring the interaction between marine features of special protection areas with offshore wind farm development zones through telemetry: second year report.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, Y., Thiebault, A., Mullers, R. & Pistorius, P. 2014. Bird-borne video-cameras show that seabird movement patterns relate to previously unrevealed proximate environment, not prey. PLoS One 9: e88424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevail, A.M., Green, J.A., Bolton, M., Daunt, F., Harris, S.M., Miller, P.I., Newton, S., Owen, E., Polton, J.A., Robertson, G., Sharples, J. & Patrick, S.C. 2021. Environmental heterogeneity promotes individual specialisation in habitat selection in a widely distributed seabird. J. Anim. Ecol. 90: 2875–2887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevail, A.M., Green, J.A., Sharples, J., Polton, J.A., Arnould, J.P.Y. & Patrick, S.C. 2019. Environmental heterogeneity amplifies behavioural response to a temporal cycle. Oikos 128: 517–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggitt, J.J., Cazenave, P.W., Howarth, L.M., Evans, P.G.H., Van Der Kooij, J. & Hiddink, J.G. 2018. Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds. Biol. Lett. 14: 20180348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, E.D., Cleasby, I.R., Bearhop, S., Bodey, T.W., Davies, R.D., Miller, P.I., Newton, J., Votier, S.C. & Hamer, K.C. 2015. Long-term individual foraging site fidelity—why some gannets don’t change their spot. Ecology 96: 3058–3074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, E.D., Owen, E., Baer, J., Carroll, M.J., Daunt, F., Dodd, S.G., Green, J.A., Guilford, T., Mavor, R.A., Miller, P.I., Newell, M.A., Newton, S.F., Robertson, G.S., Shoji, A., Soanes, L.M., Votier, S.C., Wanless, S. & Bolton, M. 2017. Breeding density, fine-scale tracking, and large-scale modeling reveal the regional distribution of four seabird species. Ecol. Appl. 27: 2074–2091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.P., Grémillet, D., Syder, J., Kierspel, M.A.M., Garthe, S., Weimerskirch, H., Schäfer-Neth, C., Scolaro, J.A., Bost, C.A., Plötz, J. & Nel, D. 2002. Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 228: 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worm, B., Sandow, M., Oschlies, A., Lotze, H.K. & Myers, R.A. 2005. Ecology: global patterns of predator diversity in the open oceans. Science 309: 1365–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P.J., Jensen, H. & Tuck, I. 2000. The influence of sediment type on the distribution of the lesser sandeel, Ammodytes marinus. J. Sea Res. 44: 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N. & Elphick, C.S. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar