Black Woodpeckers Dryocopus martius use stepping stones between woodland units

References

• Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A. & Kenward, R.E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 75: 1313–1325.
   Google Scholar
• Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baston, D. 2022. exactextractr: fast extraction from raster datasets using polygons. R package version 0.9.1, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=exactextractr.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, K.A., Haynes, K.J., Dillemuth, F.P. & Cronin, J.T. 2004. The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85: 2671–2676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélisle, M. & Desrochers, A. 2002. Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landsc. Ecol. 17: 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. & Fortin, M.-J. 2001. Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82: 1893–1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørneraas, K., Van Moorter, B., Rolandsen, C.M. & Herfindal, I. 2010. Screening global positioning system location data for errors using animal movement characteristics. J. Wildl. Manage. 74: 1361–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Bassi, E., Bergero, V., Casale, F., Chemollo, M., Falco, R., Longoni, V., Saporetti, F., Viganò, E. & Vitulano, S. 2013. Modelling distribution and potential overlap between Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus and Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius: implications for management and monitoring plans. Bird Conserv. Int. 23: 502–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. 1984. Der Schwarzspecht Dryocopus martius auf der jütländischen Halbinsel. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 21: 403–404. (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. 2002a. Spredning af unge Sortspætter Dryocopus martius i forbindelse med indvandringen til Sønderjylland. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 96: 161–167. (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. 2002b. Female Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius roosting far from its nest. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 96: 187–188.
   Google Scholar
• Cramp, S. (ed). 1985. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. IV. Terns to Woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, K.R., Suarez, A.V., Bolger, D.T. & Soulé, M.E. 2001. Extinction and colonization of birds on habitat islands. Conserv. Biol. 15: 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devictor, V., Julliard, R. & Jiguet, F. 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117: 507–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, D.M., Ribic, C.A. & Probst, J.R. 2010. Patch dynamics and the timing of colonization–abandonment events by male Kirtland’s Warblers in an early succession habitat. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1159–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, J. & Settele, J. 2009. The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J. Insect Conserv. 13: 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esri. 2023. ARCGIS World Imagery [basemap]. Scale 1:500 & 1:1500. “World Imagery”. December 12, 2009. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=10df2279f9684e4a9f6a7f08febac2a9 (accessed 1 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L. 2007. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 21: 1003–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farneda, F.Z., Rocha, R., López-Baucells, A., Groenenberg, M., Silva, I., Palmeirim, J.M., Bobrowiec, P.E.D. & Meyer, C.F.J. 2015. Trait-related responses to habitat fragmentation in Amazonian bats. J. Appl. Ecol. 52: 1381–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. 2002. The conservation value of paddock trees for birds in a variegated landscape in southern New South Wales. 2. Paddock trees as stepping stones. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 833–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjögren-Gulve, P., Boggs, C.L. & Murphy, D.D. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16: 706–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Duchesne, T. & Mao, J.S. 2005. Wolves influence Elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86: 1320–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzén, M. & Nilsson, S.G. 2010. Both population size and patch quality affect local extinctions and colonizations. Proc. R. Soc. B 277: 79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmendia, A., Cárcamo, S. & Schwendtner, O. 2006. Forest management considerations for conservation of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos populations in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrenees). Biodivers. Conserv. 15: 1399–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J.P. & Stanton, E.J. 2001. Habitat fragmentation and arthropod community change: carrion beetles, phoretic mites, and flies. Ecol. Appl. 11: 79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, C.S., Beyer, H.L. & St. Clair, C.C. 2011. Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Ecol. Appl. 21: 944–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. (eds). 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 9, Columbiformes-Piciformes. Akademischer Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, E.A. & Wiebe, K.L. 2014. Survival and habitat use by fledgling Northern Flickers in a fragmented forest landscape. J. Wildl. Manage. 78: 273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, T.C. & Doherty, P.F. 1999. On home-range gap-crossing. Auk 116: 618–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, C.A. 1995. Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 9: 845–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, F. 1984. Der Schwarzspecht Dryocopus martius als Brutvogel auf der dänischen Insel Bornholm. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 21: 431–433. (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, L.P., Sabatino, M.C., Jaimes, F.R. & Saura, S. 2017. Landscape connectivity and the role of small habitat patches as stepping stones: an assessment of the grassland biome in South America. Biodivers. Conserv. 26: 3465–3479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R. 2021. geosphere: spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5-14, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J., Barbosa, M., Ghosh, A. & Mandel, A. 2023a. geodata: download geographic data. R package version 0.5-8, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geodata.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J., Bivand, R., Pebesma, E. & Sumner, M.D. 2023b. terra: spatial data analysis. R package version 1.7-39, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra.
   Google Scholar
• Hinam, H.L. & St. Clair, C.C. 2008. High levels of habitat loss and fragmentation limit reproductive success by reducing home range size and provisioning rates of Northern Saw-whet Owls. Biol. Conserv. 141: 524–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsley, S.A. 2000. The costs of multiple patch use by birds. Landsc. Ecol. 15: 765–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, K., Nilsson, S.G. & Tjernberg, M. 1993. Characteristics and utilization of old Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius holes by hole-nesting species. Ibis 135: 410–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kear, J. 2003. Cavity-nesting ducks: why woodpeckers matter. Br. Birds 96: 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgo, J.C. & Vukovich, M. 2012. Factors affecting breeding season survival of Red-Headed Woodpeckers in South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manage. 76: 328–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarevas-Irby, J.A., Wikelski, M. & Farine, D.R. 2021. Efficient movement strategies mitigate the energetic cost of dispersal. Ecol. Lett. 24: 1432–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer-Schadt, S., Kaiser, T.S., Frank, K. & Wiegand, T. 2011. Analyzing the effect of stepping stones on target patch colonisation in structured landscapes for Eurasian lynx. Landsc. Ecol. 26: 501–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, G. 2019. Basemap03. Technical documentation of the method for elaboration of a land-use and land-cover map for Denmark. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, Technical Report No. 159. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/TR159.Pdf (accessed 9 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J.S., Rachlow, J.L., Garton, E.O. & Vierling, L.A. 2007. Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error. J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 663–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer, D.B. & Fischer, J. 2006. Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, A.D., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. 2006. Scattered trees are keystone structures – implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 132: 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martensen, A.C., Ribeiro, M.C., Banks-Leite, C., Prado, P.I. & Metzger, J.P. 2012. Associations of forest cover, fragment area, and connectivity with Neotropical understory bird species richness and abundance. Conserv. Biol. 26: 1100–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysterud, A. & Ims, R.A. 1998. Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations. Ecology 79: 1435–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschulz, E.L., Brown, M. & Farwig, N. 2013. Frequent bird movements across a highly fragmented landscape: the role of species traits and forest matrix. Anim. Conserv. 16: 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord-Larsen, T., Johannsen, V.K., Riis-Nielsen, T., Thomsen, I.M., Bentsen, N.S., Gundersen, P. & Jørgensen, B.B. 2018. Skove og plantager 2017: forest statistics 2017. Institut for Geovidenskab og Naturforvaltning, Københavns Universitet (in Danish). https://curis.ku.dk/portal/files/213509961/SP2017_web.pdf (accessed 9 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Nour, N., van Damme, R., Matthysen, E. & Dhondt, A.A. 1999. Forest birds in forest fragments: are fragmentation effects independent of season? Bird Study 46: 279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E. 2018. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R. J. 10: 439–446.
   Google Scholar
• Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R. 2023. Spatial Data Science: With Applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, C.G., Vergara, P.M., Saura, S. & Hernández, J. 2015. Do corridors promote connectivity for bird-dispersed trees? The case of Persea lingue in Chilean fragmented landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 30: 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, O.J. & Radford, J.Q. 2009. Gap-crossing decisions of forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Austral Ecol. 34: 435–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, H. & Ciudad, C. 2012. Influence of habitat quality, population size, patch size, and connectivity on patch-occupancy dynamics of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker. Conserv. Biol. 26: 284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, H., Ciudad, C., Vera, R. & Balione, V. 2007. No effect of habitat fragmentation on post-fledging, first-year and adult survival in the Middle Spotted Woodpecker. Ecography 30: 685–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolstad, J., Majewski, P. & Rolstad, E. 1998. Black Woodpecker use of habitats and feeding substrates in a managed Scandinavian forest. J. Wildl. Manag. 62: 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, L. & Saura, S. 2012. Assessing the importance of individual habitat patches as irreplaceable connecting elements: an analysis of simulated and real landscape data. Ecol. Complex. 11: 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, M., Hawkins, B.A., Morales-Castilla, I., Vidanes, R.M., Ferrero, M. & Rodríguez, M.Á. 2013. Does fragmentation increase extinction thresholds? A European-wide test with seven forest birds. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22: 1282–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, G., Rosenmann, M., Novoa, F.F. & Sabat, P. 2002. Hematological parameters and stress index in Rufous-collared Sparrows dwelling in urban environments. Condor 104: 162–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, E.W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M.A., Redford, K.H., Wannebo, A.V. & Woolmer, G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52: 891–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura, S., Bodin, Ö & Fortin, M.-J. 2014. Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J. Appl. Ecol. 51: 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaepfer, M.A., Runge, M.C. & Sherman, P.W. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 474–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiegelow, F.K.A. & Mönkkönen, M. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol. Appl. 12: 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C.M., Pereira, J.A.C., Gusmões, J.D.S.P., Mendes, B.E.P., Valente, H., Morgan, A.P., Goulart, D. & Hasui, É. 2020. Birds’ gap-crossing in open matrices depends on landscape structure, tree size, and predation risk. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 18: 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff, D., Farr, J.A., Cox, J. & Mehlman, D.W. 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conserv. Biol. 6: 493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, E.M., Merckx, T., Riutta, T., Bebber, D.P., Redhead, D., Riordan, P. & Macdonald, D.W. 2013. Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation. Ecology 94: 1519–1530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair, C.C., Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. & Hannon, S. 1998. Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Conserv. Ecol. 2: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Sunde, P. & Redpath, S.M. 2006. Combining information from range use and habitat selection: sex-specific spatial responses to habitat fragmentation in Tawny Owls Strix aluco. Ecography 29: 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjernberg, M., Johnsson, K. & Nilsson, S.G. 1993. Density variation and breeding success of the Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in relation to forest fragmentation. Ornis Fenn. 70: 155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villepique, J.T., Bleich, V.C., Pierce, B.M., Stephenson, T.R., Botta, R.A. & Bowyer, R.T. 2008. Evaluating GPS collar error: a critical evaluation of Televilt POSREC-Science™ collars and a method for screening location data. Calif. Fish Game 94: 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• With, K.A. & Crist, T.O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76: 2446–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabe, D.R.S., Marques, E.J. & Marini, M.Â. 2010. Movements of birds among natural vegetation patches in the Pantanal, Brazil. Bird Conserv. Int. 20: 400–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar