References
- Barton, K. 2019. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
- Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J. & Loder, N. 1999. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers. Distrib. 5: 165–174.
- Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2004. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods. Res. 33: 261–304.
- Courter, J.R. 2017. Provisioning behavior of male and female Eastern Screech-owls during the post-brooding period. Am. Midl. Nat. 177 (1): 69–74. DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-177.1.69.
- Delmée, E., Dachy, P. & Simon, P. 1978. Fifteen years of observations on the reproductions of a forest population of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco). Gerfaut 68: 590–650.
- Dement’ev, G.P., Gladkow, N.A., Ptushenko, E.S., Spangenberg, E.P. & Sudilovskaya, A.M. 1951. Birds of the Soviet Union (Ptitsy Sovetskogo Soyuza), Vol 1. Moscow (English language translation, Jerusalem 1966). Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
- Galeotti, P., Morimando, F. & Violani, C. 1991. Feeding ecology of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) in urban habitats (northern Italy). Bolletino di Zoologia 58: 143–150.
- Gamero, C. & De Miguel, F.J. 2017. Análisis y comparación de la dieta del cárabo común (Strix aluco) y del búho chico (Asio otus) en el Monte de Valdelatas (Madrid). In Juan, M., Pérez-Granados, C. & de la Puente, J. (eds) Anuario Ornitológico de Madrid 2011-2014, Vol. 1: 25–39. SEO-Montícola, Madrid.
- Grašytė, G., Rumbutis, S., Dagys, M. & Treinys, R. 2016. Breeding performance, apparent survival, nesting location and diet in a local population of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in Central Lithuania over the long term. Acta Ornithol. 51: 163–174.
- Gryz, J. & Krauze-Gryz, D. 2019. Changes in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco diet along an urbanisation gradient. Biologia 74: 279–285.
- James, F.C. 1970. Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51: 365–390.
- Jehl, J.R. & Murray, B.G. 1986. The evolution of normal and reverse sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds and other birds. In Johnston, R.F. (ed) Current Ornithology, Vol. 3: 1–86. Springer, Boston, MA.
- Karell, P., Brommer, J.E., Ahola, K. & Karstinen, T. 2013. Brown Tawny Owls moult more flight feathers than grey ones. J. Avian Biol. 44: 235–244.
- Martínez, J.A., Zuberogoitia, I. & Alonso, R. 2002. Strix aluco. In Martínez, J.A., Zuberogoitia, I. & Alonso, R. (eds) Rapaces Nocturnas. Guía para la determinación de la edad y el sexo en las Estringiformes ibéricas, 95–102. Monticola Ed, Madrid.
- Massemin, S., Korpimäki, E. & Wiehn, J. 2000. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in Kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia 124: 26–32.
- Meiri, S. & Dayan, T. 2003. On the validity of Bergmann’s rule. J. Biogeogr. 30: 331–351.
- Mikkola, H. & Lamminmäki, J. 2014. Suomen Pöllöjen Sulkasadon, Iän Ja Sukupuolen Määritysopas. BirdLife Finland; Finnish Ornithological Society, Finland (in Finnish).
- Moltoni, E. 1949. Alcuni dati sul peso e sulla longevita degli uggeli rapaci italiana. Riv. Ital. Ornithol. 19: 95–122.
- Mueller, H.C. & Meyer, K. 1985. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size. In Johnston, R.F. (ed) Current Ornithology, Vol. 2: 65–101. Springer, Boston, MA.
- Naimi, B., Hamm, N., Groen, T.A., Skidmore, A.K. & Toxopeus, A.G. 2014. Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling?. Ecography 37: 191–203.
- Newton, I. 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. Poyser, Berkhamsted.
- Palacio, F.X. 2020. Urban exploiters have broader dietary niches than urban avoiders. Ibis 162: 42–49.
- Pérez-Camacho, L., Martínez-Hesterkamp, S., Rebollo, S., García-Salgado, G. & Morales-Castilla, I. 2018. Structural complexity of hunting habitat and territoriality increase the reversed sexual size dimorphism in diurnal raptors. J. Avian Biol. 49: e01745.
- Piault, R., Gasparini, J., Bize, P., Jenni-Eiermann, S. & Roulin, A. 2009. Pheomelanin-based coloration and the ability to cope with variation in food supply and parasitism. Am. Nat. 174: 548–556.
- Piechocki, R., Stubbe, M., Uhlenhaut, K. & Dawka, N. 1977. Die Ernhrungsökologie des Uhus Bubo bubo yenisseensis Buturlin in der Mongolischen Volksrepublik. Zool. Jb. Syst. 104: 539–559. (in German).
- Ratajc, U., Breskvar, M., Džeroski, S. & Vrezec, A. 2022. Differential responses of coexisting owls to annual small mammal population fluctuations in temperate mixed forest. Ibis 164: 535–551.
- R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed on 16th of March 2023).
- Rising, J.D. 1987. Geographic variation of sexual dimorphism in size of Savannah Sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis): a test of hypotheses. Evolution 41: 514–524.
- Roulin, A., Ducret, B., Ravussin, P.A. & Altwegg, R. 2003. Female colour polymorphism covaries with reproductive strategies in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco. J. Avian Biol. 34: 393–401.
- Roulin, A., Gasparini, J., Bize, P., Ritschard, M. & Richner, H. 2008. Melanin-based colorations signal strategies to cope with poor and rich environments. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 507–519.
- Schoenjahn, J., Pavey, C.R. & Walter, G.H. 2020. Why female birds of prey are larger than males. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 20: 1–11.
- Solonen, T., Karhunen, J., Kekkonen, J., Kolunen, H. & Pietiäinen, H. 2017. Diet and reproduction in coastal and inland populations of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in southern Finland. J. Ornithol. 158: 541–548.
- Storer, R.W. 1966. Sexual dimorphism and food habits in three North American accipiters. Auk 83: 423–436. DOI: 10.2307/4083053.
- Sunde, P., Bølstad, M.S. & Møller, J.D. 2003. Reversed sexual dimorphism in Tawny Owls, Strix aluco, correlates with duty division in breeding effort. Oikos 101: 265–278.
- Svensson, L. 1992. Identification Guide to European Passerines, 4th edn. British Trust for Ornithology, Stockholm.
- Tapia, L. & Zuberogoitia, I. 2018. Breeding and nestling biology of raptors. In Sarasola, J.H., Grande, J.M. & Negro, J.J. (eds) Birds of Prey: Biology and Conservation in the XXI Century, 63–94. Springer International Publishing, Valencia, Spain.
- Zuberogoitia, I., Zabala, J. & Martínez, J.E. 2018. Moult in birds of prey: a review of current knowledge and future challenges for research. Ardeola 65: 183–207.