An analysis of sexual size dimorphism in goose

REFERENCES

• Abouheif, E. & Fairbairn, D.J. (1997) A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch’s rule. The American Naturalist, 149: 540–562. doi:10.1086/286004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. (1994) Sexual Selection (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, S. (2005) Experimental animal domestication and its application to the study of animal exploitation in prehistory, in: Vigne, J.-D., Peters, J. & Helmer, D. (Eds) The First Steps of Animal Domestication: New Archaeological Approaches (Oxford, Oxbow Books).
   Google Scholar
• Dale, J., Dunn, P.O., Figuerola, J., Lislevand, T., Szekely, T. & Whittingham, L.A. (2007) Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274: 2971–2979. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (New York, D. Appleton).
   Google Scholar
• Delacour, J. (1954) The Waterfowl of the World. Vol. 1 (London, Country Life).
   Google Scholar
• Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (1994) New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Vol. 2 of Handbook of the Birds of the World (Barcelona, Lynx Edicions).
   Google Scholar
• Drake, A.G. & Klingenberg, C.P. (2010) Large‐scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. The American Naturalist, 175: 289–301. doi:10.1086/650372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, C.R., Fox A.D., Alisauskas R.T., Andreev A., Bromley R.G., Degtyarev A.G., Ebbinge B., Gurtovaya E.N., Kerbes R., Kondratyev A.V., Kostin I., Krechmar A.V., Litvin K.E., Miyabayashi Y., Mooij J.H., Oates R.M., Orthmeyer D.L., Sabano Y., Simpson S.G., Solovieva D.V., Spindler M.A., Syroechkovsky Y.V., Takekawa J.Y., Walsh A. (2005) Circumpolar variation in morphological characteristics of Greater White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons: Capsule Greater White-fronted Geese show significant variation in body size from sampling locations throughout their circumpolar breeding range. Bird Study, 52: 104–119. doi:10.1080/00063650509461380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U., & Székely, T. (Eds) (2007) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. (2004) Management, nutrition and products of domestic geese: a review. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 139–144. Sydney, New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Frynta, D., Baudyšová, J., Hradcová, P., Faltusová, K. & Kratochvíl, L., Laudet V. (2012) Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in domestic dog. Plos One, 7 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica, 4 (1). Available: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.html
   Google Scholar
• Li, H.Af., Zhu, W.Q., Chen, K.W., Song, W.T., Shu, J.T., Han, W. & Xu, W.J. (2010) Two maternal origins of Chinese domestic light-body type goose. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9 (11): 1713–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovich, J.E. & Gibbons, J.W. (1992) A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth, Development and Aging, 56: 269–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montgomerie, R. (2009) Charles Darwin’s fancy. The Auk, 126: 477–484. doi:10.1525/auk.2009.1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polák, J. & Frynta, D. (2009) Sexual size dimorphism in domestic goats, sheep, and their wild relatives. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 98: 872–883. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01294.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polák, J. & Frynta, D. (2010) Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in cattle breeds support Rensch’s rule. Evolutionary Ecology, 24: 1255–1266. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9354-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remeš, V. & Székely, T. (2010) Domestic chickens defy Rensch’s rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 2754–2759. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02126.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensch, B. (1950) Die Abhangigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Korpergrosse. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 1: 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rensch, B. (1959) Evolution above the Species Level (London, Methuen and Co. Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Romanov, M.N. & Weigend, S. (2001) Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science, 80: 1057–1063. doi:10.1093/ps/80.8.1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambraus, H.H. (1992) A Colour Atlas of Livestock Breeds (Stuttgart, Wolfe Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Székely, T., Lislevand, T. & Figuerola, J. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in birds, in: Fairbairn, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Székely, T. (Eds) Sex, Size and Gender Roles (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Warton, D.I., Wright, I.J., Falster, D.S. & Westoby, M. (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews, 81: 259–291. doi:10.1017/S1464793106007007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink, R.M. & Remsen, J.V. (1986) Evolutionary processes and patterns of geographic variation in birds, in: Johnston, R.F. (Ed.) Current Ornithology, Vol. 4, pp. 1–69 (New York, Plenum Press).
   Google Scholar