Genetic analysis of production and feed efficiency traits in an Orlopp turkey line (Meleagris gallopavo)

REFERENCES

• Arthur, J.A. & Abplanalp, H. (1975) Linear estimates of heritability and genetic correlation for egg production, body weight, conformation and egg weight of turkeys. Poultry Science, 54: 11–23. doi:10.3382/ps.0540011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M.L., Bastiaansen, J.W.M., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Ducro, B.J., Vereijken, A.L.J. & Groenen, M.A.M. (2011) Genetic variances, heritabilities and maternal effects on body weight, breast meat yield, meat quality traits and the shape of the growth curve in turkey birds. BMC Genetics, 12: 14–23. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, B., Bordas, A., Dubos, F., Morganx, P. & Marie-Etancelin, C. (2012) Feed efficiency in the laying duck: appropriate measurements and genetic parameters. Poultry Science, 91: 1065–1073. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-02008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L.A., Kelly, M.J., Miller, S.P. & Wood, B.J. (2010) Genotype x environment interaction as it relates to egg production in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Journal of Animal Science, 88: 1957–1966. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L.A., Wood, B.J. & Miller, S.P. (2012a) The genetic parameters of feed efficiency and its component traits in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Genetics Selection Evolution, 44: 2–6. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-44-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, L.A., Wood, B.J. & Miller, S.P. (2012b) The investigation of ultrasound technology to measure breast muscle depth as a correlated trait to breast meat yield in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Journal of Animal Science, 90: 3410–3417. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapuis, H., Tixier-Boichard, M., Delabrosse, Y. & Ducrocq, V. (1996) Multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters for production traits in three selected turkey strains. Genetics Selection Evolution, 28: 299–317. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-28-3-299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson, D.A., Velleman, S.G. & Nestor, K.E. (2002) Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 15. Effect of long-term selection for increased egg production on the genetics of growth and egg production traits. Poultry Science, 81: 316–320. doi:10.1093/ps/81.3.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R. (2009). Asreml User Guide Release 3.0., pp. 1–267 (Hemel Hempstead, UK, VSN International Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Havenstein, G., Nestor, K., Toelle, V. & Bacon, W. (1988) Estimates of genetic parameters in turkeys. 1. Body weight and skeletal characteristics. Poultry Science, 67: 1378–1387. doi:10.3382/ps.0671378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranis, D.A., Hocking, P.M., Hill, W.G. & Woolliams, J. (2006) Genetic parameters for a heavy female turkey line: impact of simultaneous selection for body weight and total egg number. British Poultry Science, 47: 685–693. doi:10.1080/00071660601053304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiting, P. (1990) Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying hens: causes of variation in residual feed consumption. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 46: 133–152. doi:10.1079/WPS19900017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccartney, M.G., Nestor, K.E. & Harvey, W.R. (1968) Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey: 2. Selection for increased body weight and egg production. Poultry Science, 47: 981–990. doi:10.3382/ps.0470981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morisson, M., Bordas, A., Petit, J., Jayat-Vignoles, C., Julien, R. & Minvielle, F. (1997) Associated effects of divergent selection for residual feed consumption on reproduction, sperm characteristics, and mitochondria of spermatozoa. Poultry Science, 76: 425–431. doi:10.1093/ps/76.3.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor, K.E., Anderson, J.W. & Patterson, R.A. (2000) Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 14. Changes in genetic parameters over thirty generations of selection for increased body weight. Poultry Science, 79: 445–452. doi:10.1093/ps/79.4.445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor, K.E., Brown, K.I. & Weaver, C.R. (1972) Egg quality and poult production in turkeys: 2. Inheritance and relationship among traits. Poultry Science, 51: 147–158. doi:10.3382/ps.0510147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor, K.E., Mccartney, M.G. & Harvey, W.R. (1967) Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey: 1. Genetic and non-genetic variation in body weight and body measurements. Poultry Science, 46: 1374–1384. doi:10.3382/ps.0461374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor, K.E. & Noble, D.O. (1995) Influence of selection for increased egg production, body weight, and shank width of turkeys on egg composition and the relationship of the egg traits to hatchability. Poultry Science, 74: 427–433. doi:10.3382/ps.0740427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor, K.E., Noble, D.O., Zhu, J. & Moritsu, Y. (1996) Direct and correlated responses to long-term selection for increased body weight and egg production in turkeys. Poultry Science, 75: 1180–1191. doi:10.3382/ps.0751180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, J., Willems, O.W. & Wood, B.J. (2014) Evaluating genetic variance of reproductive traits across ten years of selection in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vancouver, Canada. Abstract number: 150.
   Google Scholar
• Quinton, C.D., Wood, B.J. & Miller, S.P. (2011) Genetic analysis of survival and fitness in turkeys with multiple-trait animal models. Poultry Science, 90: 2479–2486. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, O.W., Miller, S.P. & Wood, B.J. (2013) Assessment of residual body weight gain and residual intake and body weight gain as feed efficiency traits in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Genetics Selection Evolution, 45: 26–34. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-45-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar