Assessing serum metabolite profiles as predictors for feed efficiency in broiler chickens reared at geographically distant locations

References

• Aggrey, S. E., J. Lee, A. B. Karnuah, and R. Rekaya. 2014. “Transcriptomic Analysis of Genes in the Nitrogen Recycling Pathway of Meat-Type Chickens Divergently Selected for Feed Efficiency.” Animal Genetics 45: 215–222. doi:10.1111/age.12098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. P., and J. J. Crowley. 2012. “Residual Intake and Body Weight Gain: A New Measure of Efficiency in Growing Cattle.” Journal of Animal Science 90: 109–115. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaut, M. 2015. “Gut Microbiota and Energy Balance: Role in Obesity.” The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 74: 227–234. doi:10.1017/S0029665114001700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje, W. G., and G. E. Carstens. 2009. “Association of Mitochondrial Function and Feed Efficiency in Poultry and Livestock Species.” Journal of Animal Science 87: E48–E63. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbin, J. T., J. Gong, and S. Sharif. 2008. “Interactions between Commensal Bacteria and the Gut-Associated Immune System of the Chicken.” Animal Health Research Reviews 9: 101–110. doi:10.1017/S146625230800145X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong, H., H. Lin, H. C. Jiao, Z. G. Song, J. P. Zhao, and K. J. Jiang. 2007. “Altered Development and Protein Metabolism in Skeletal Muscles of Broiler Chickens (Gallus Gallus Domesticus) by Corticosterone.” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 147: 189–195. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabarrou, J. F., P. A. Géraert, M. Picard, and A. Bordas. 1997. “Diet-Induced Thermogenesis in Cockerels Is Modulated by Genetic Selection for High or Low Residual Feed Intake.” Journal of Nutrition 127: 2371–2376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, W. B., and H. S. Siegel. 1983. “Evaluation of the Heterophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as a Measure of Stress in Chickens.” Avian Diseases 27: 972–979. doi:10.2307/1590198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herd, R. M., and P. F. Arthur. 2009. “Physiological Basis for Residual Feed Intake.” Journal of Animal Science 87: E64–E71. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jégou, M., F. Gondret, A. Vincent, C. Tréfeu, H. Gilbert, and I. Louveau. 2016. “Whole Blood Transcriptomics Is Relevant to Identify Molecular Changes in Response to Genetic Selection for Feed Efficiency and Nutritional Status in the Pig.” PLoS One 11: e0146550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, B., B. Ernest, J. R. Gooding, S. Das, A. M. Saxton, J. Simon, J. Dupont, S. Métayer-Coustard, S. R. Campagna, and B. H. Voy. 2012. “Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling of Chicken Adipose Tissue in Response to Insulin Neutralization and Fasting.” BMC Genomics 13: 441. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. K., M. Mcgee, D. H. Crews JR., T. Sweeney, T. M. Boland, and D. A. Kenny. 2010. “Repeatability of Feed Efficiency, Carcass Ultrasound, Feeding Behavior, and Blood Metabolic Variables in Finishing Heifers Divergently Selected for Residual Feed Intake.” Journal of Animal Science 88: 3214–3225. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Naou, T., N. Le Floc’h, I. Louveau, H. Gilbert, and F. Gondret. 2012. “Metabolic Changes and Tissue Responses to Selection on Residual Feed Intake in Growing Pigs.” Journal of Animal Science 90: 4771–4780. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., A. B. Karnuah, R. Rekaya, N. B. Anthony, and S. E. Aggrey. 2015. “Transcriptomic Analysis to Elucidate the Molecular Mechanisms that Underlie Feed Efficiency in Meat-Type Chickens.” Molecular Genetics and Genomics 290: 1673–1682. doi:10.1007/s00438-015-1025-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, J., B. Svihus, and K. Rudi. 2016. “Rearing Room Affects the Non-Dominant Chicken Cecum Microbiota, while Diet Affects the Dominant Microbiota.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 5 (3): 16. doi:10.3389/fvets.2016.00016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler-Zebeli, B. U., A. Molnár, M. Hollmann, E. Magowan, R. Hawken, P. G. Lawlor, and Q. Zebeli. 2016. “Comparison of Growth Performance and Excreta Composition in Broiler Chickens When Ranked according to Various Feed Efficiency Metrics.” Journal of Animal Science 94: 2890–2899. doi:10.2527/jas.2016-0375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignon-Grasteau, S., A. Narcy, N. Rideau, C. Chantry-Darmon, M. Y. Boscher, N. Sellier, M. Chabault, B. Konsak-Ilievski, E. Le Bihan-Duval, and I. Gabriel. 2015. “Impact of Selection for Digestive Efficiency on Microbiota Composition in the Chicken.” PLoS One 10 (8): e0135488. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagne, L., F. Loisel, T. Le Naou, F. Gondret, H. Gilbert, and M. Le Gall. 2014. “Difference in Short-Term Responses to a High-Fiber Diet in Pigs Divergently Selected for Residual Feed Intake.” Journal of Animal Science 92: 1512–1523. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, H., N. Shimada, and M. Yoshioka. 2004. “Current Research on Acute Phase Proteins in Veterinary Diagnosis: An Overview.” Veterinary Journal 168: 28–40. doi:10.1016/S1090-0233(03)00119-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann, C., and R. Basler. 2012. Die Chemische Untersuchung Von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt, Germany,: VDLUFA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• O’reilly, E. L., and P. D. Eckersall. 2014. “Acute Phase Proteins: A Review of Their Function, Behaviour and Measurement in Chickens.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 70: 27–44. doi:10.1017/S0043933914000038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. C., R. M. Herd, J. A. Archer, and P. F. Arthur. 2004. “Metabolic Differences in Angus Steers Divergently Selected for Residual Feed Intake.” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44: 441–452. doi:10.1071/EA02219.
   Google Scholar
• Rodehutscord, M., C. Rückert, H. P. Maurer, H. Schenkel, W. Schipprack, K. E. Bach Knudsen, M. Schollenberger, et al. 2016. “Variation in Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Cereal Grains from Different Genotypes.” Archives of Animal Nutrition 70: 87–107. doi:10.1080/1745039X.2015.1133111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, L. F., M. J. Zuidhof, R. A. Renema, A. Naeima, and F. E. Robinson. 2011. “Effects of Maternal Energy Efficiency on Broiler Chicken Growth, Feed Conversion, Residual Feed Intake, and Residual Maintenance Metabolizable Energy Requirements.” Poultry Science 90: 2904–2912. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schokker, D., G. Veninga, S. A. Vastenhouw, A. Bossers, F. M. De Bree, L. M. Kaal-Lansbergen, J. M. Rebel, and M. A. Smits. 2015. “Early Life Microbial Colonization of the Gut and Intestinal Development Differ between Genetically Divergent Broiler Lines.” BMC Genomics 16: 418. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegerstetter, S.-C., R. M. Petri, E. Magowan, Q. Zebeli, P. G. Lawlor, and B. U. Metzler-Zebeli (2016) ECO-FCE: Feed Efficiency Related Gut Microbiota Profiles Vary in Chickens Raised at Two Locations. 67th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, p. 200, August 29-September 2, Belfast.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, D., M. S. Geier, R. J. Hughes, S. E. Denman, and R. J. Moore. 2013. “Highly Variable Microbiota Development in the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract.” PLoS ONE 8 (12): e84290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D., R. J. Hughes, M. S. Geier, and R. J. Moore. 2016. “Bacteria within the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota Correlated with Improved Growth and Feed Conversion: Challenges Presented for the Identification of Performance Enhancing Probiotic Bacteria.” Frontiers in Microbiology 7: 187. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen, Q., P.-J. Verhulst, A. Collin, A. Bordas, K. Verbeke, G. Vansant, E. Decuypère, and J. Buyse. 2007. “Further Investigations on the Role of Diet-Induced Thermogenesis in the Regulation of Feed Intake in Chickens: Comparison of Adult Cockerels of Lines Selected for High or Low Residual Feed Intake.” Poultry Science 86: 1960–1971. doi:10.1093/ps/86.5.895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eerden, E., H. Van Den Brand, H. K. Parmentier, M. C. M. De Jong, and B. Kemp. 2004. “Phenotypic Selection for Residual Feed Intake and Its Effect on Humoral Immune Responses in Growing Layer Hens.” Poultry Science 83: 1602–1609. doi:10.1093/ps/83.9.1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., H. Lin, K. J. Jiang, H. C. Jiao, and Z. G. Song. 2008. “Corticosterone Administration and High-Energy Feed Results in Enhanced Fat Accumulation and Insulin Resistance in Broiler Chickens.” British Poultry Science 49: 487–495. doi:10.1080/00071660802251731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuo, Z., S. J. Lamont, W. R. Lee, and B. Abasht. 2015. “RNA-Seq Analysis of Abdominal Fat Reveals Differences between Modern Commercial Broiler Chickens with High and Low Feed Efficiencies.” PLoS One 10 (8): e0135810. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkifli, I., M. T. Che Norma, C. H. Chong, and T. C. Loh. 2000. “Heterophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Tonic Immobility Reactions to Preslaughter Handling in Broiler Chickens Treated with Ascorbic Acid.” Poultry Science 79: 402–406. doi:10.1093/ps/79.3.402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkifli, I., P. Najafi, A. J. Nurfarahin, A. F. Soleimani, S. Kumari, A. A. Aryani, E. L. O’reilly, and P. D. Eckersall. 2014. “Acute-Phase Proteins, Interleukin 6, and Heat Shock Protein 70 in Broiler Chickens Administered with Corticosterone.” Poultry Science 93: 3112–3118. doi:10.3382/ps.2014-04099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar