Evaluation of cockerel spermatozoa viability and motility by a novel enzyme based cell viability assay

References

• Amann, R. P., and D. Waberski. 2014. “Computer-Assisted Spermatozoa Analysis (CASA): Capabilities and Potential Developments.” Theriogenology 81: 5–17. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz, D. M. 2006. “Assessment of Bovine Spermatozoa Viability by MTT Reduction Assay.” Animal Reproduction Science 92: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.05.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz, D. M., L. Ahlswede, and H. Enbergs. 2005. “Application of MTT Reduction Assay to Evaluate Equine Spermatozoa Viability.” Theriogenology 64: 1350–1356. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, M. V., P. M. Herst, and A. S. Tan. 2005. “Tetrazolium Dyes as Tools in Cell Biology: New Insights into Their Cellular Reduction.” Biotechnology Annual Review 11: 127–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berridge, M. V., A. S. Tan, K. D. Mccoy, and R. Wang. 1996. “The Biochemical and Cellular Basis of Cell Proliferation Assays that Use Tetrazolium Salts.” Biochemica 4: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Blesbois, E., I. Grasseau, F. Seigneurin, S. Mignon-Grasteau, M. Saint Jalme, and M. Mialon-Richard. 2008. “Predictors of Success of Semen Cryopreservation in Chickens.” Theriogenology 69: 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, W., and J. Quinn. 1937. “The Collection of Spermatozoaatozoa from the Domestic Fowl and Turkey.” Poultry Science 16: 19–24. doi:10.3382/ps.0160019.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, J., S. Choo, H. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Hwang, and D. Kim. 2008. “Evaluation of Boar Spermatozoa Viability by MTT Reduction Assay in Beltsville Thawing Solution Extender.” Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21: 494–498. doi:10.5713/ajas.2008.70480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalah, T., and J. Brillard. 1998. “Comparison of Assessment of Fowl Spermatozoa Viability by Eosin-Nigrosin and Dual Fluorescence (SYBR-14/PI).” Theriogenology 50: 487–493. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00155-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalah, T., F. Seigneurin, E. Blesbois, and J. Brillard. 1999. “In Vitro Comparison of Fowl Spermatozoa Viability in Ejaculates Frozen by Three Different Techniques and Relationship with Subsequent Fertility in Vivo.” Cryobiology 39: 185–191. doi:10.1006/cryo.1999.2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P., J. P. Stenvang, and W. L. Godfrey. 2004. “A Flow Cytometric Method for Rapid Determination of Spermatozoa Concentration and Viability in Mammalian and Avian Semen.” Journal of Andrology 25: 255–264. doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02786.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordelli, E., P. Eleuteri, G. Leter, M. Rescia, and M. Spanò. 2005. “Flow Cytometry Applications in the Evaluation of Spermatozoa Quality: Semen Analysis, Spermatozoa Function and DNA Integrity.” Contraception 72: 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhurvey, M., V. Gupta, S. Nema, A. Patidar, M. Shivhare, N. Singh, and V. Shakya. 2012. “Modern Semen Evaluation Techniques in Domestic Animals: A Review.” DHR International Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences 3: 62–83.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, A. M. 1999. “Prospective Approaches to Avoid Flock Fertility Problems: Predictive Assessment of Spermatozoa Function Traits in Poultry.” Poultry Science 78: 437–443. doi:10.1093/ps/78.3.437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, O. I., L. Cuiling, W. Jiaojiao, and Z. Huiping. 2013. “Use of Fluorescent Dyes for Readily Recognizing Spermatozoa Damage.” Journal of Reproduction & Infertility 14: 120–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, J. K., and E. Mocé. 2005. “Fertility Evaluation of Frozen/Thawed Semen.” Theriogenology 64: 492–504. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, H., R. Takai, N. Tanaka, K. Mizoguchi, T. Tsuno, S. I. Igarashi, and M. Usami. 1995. “Simple Methods for Objective Assessment of Spermatozoa Viability and Motility with MTT Assay and Spermatozoa Quality Analyzer (SQA) in Rats.” Congenital Anomalies 35: 477–480. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4520.1995.tb00314.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hazary, R. C., D. Chaudhuri, and G. J. Wishart. 2001. “Application of an MTT Reduction Assay for Assessing Spermatozoa Quality and Predicting Fertilising Ability of Domestic Fowl Semen.” British Poultry Science 42: 115–117. doi:10.1080/713655009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder, A. L., R. Goth-Goldstein, D. Lucas, and C. P. Koshland. 2012. “Particle-Induced Artifacts in the MTT and LDH Viability Assays.” Chemical Research in Toxicology 25: 1885–1892. doi:10.1021/tx3001708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. S., A. Johannisson, M. Wallgren, S. Nagy, A. P. Siqueira, and H. Rodriguez-Martinez. 2011. “Flow Cytometry for the Assessment of Animal Spermatozoa Integrity and Functionality: State of the Art.” Asian Journal of Andrology 13: 406–419. doi:10.1038/aja.2011.15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, M., Y. Miyazono, K. Sasamoto, Y. Ohkura, and K. Ueno. 1997. “A Highly Water-Soluble Disulfonated Tetrazolium Salt as a Chromogenic Indicator for NADH as well as Cell Viability.” Talanta 44: 1299–1305. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(97)00017-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. M., D. R. Holsberger, and A. M. Donoghue. 2000. “Correlation of CASA Velocity and Linearity Parameters with Spermatozoa Mobility Phenotype in Turkeys.” Journal of Andrology 21: 65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. C., Y. F. Huang, and N. Q. Lü. 2014. “Computer-Aided Spermatozoa Analysis: Past, Present and Future.” Andrologia 46: 329–338. doi:10.1111/and.12093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroto-Morales, A., O. García-Álvarez, M. Ramón, F. Martínez-Pastor, M. R. Fernandez-Santos, A. J. Soler, and J. J. Garde. 2016. “Current Status and Potential of Morphometric Spermatozoa Analysis.” Asian Journal of Andrology 18: 863–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocé, E., and J. K. Graham. 2008. “In Vitro Evaluation of Spermatozoa Quality.” Animal Reproduction Science 105: 104–118. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocé, E., I. Grasseau, and E. Blesbois. 2010. “Cryoprotectant and Freezing-Process Alter the Ability of Chicken Spermatozoa to Acrosome React.” Animal Reproduction Science 122: 359–366. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, S. T., G. Van der Horst, and D. Mortimer. 2015. “The Future of Computer-Aided Spermatozoa Analysis.” Asian Journal of Andrology 17: 545–553. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.154312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., R. Aboutorabi, E. Esfandiari, and M. Mardani. 2002. “Spermatozoa MTT Viability Assay: A New Method for Evaluation of Human Spermatozoa Viability.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 19: 477–482. doi:10.1023/A:1020310503143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partyka, A., W. Niżański, and E. Łukaszewicz. 2010. “Evaluation of Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Fowl Semen by Flow Cytometry.” Theriogenology 74: 1019–1027. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrunkina, A., and R. Harrison. 2013. “Fluorescence Technologies for Evaluating Male Gamete (Dys) Function.” Reproduction in Domestic Animals 48: 11–24. doi:10.1111/rda.2013.48.issue-s1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrunkina, A. M., D. Waberski, A. R. Gunzel-Apel, and E. Tōpfer-Petersen. 2007. “Determinants of Spermatozoa Quality and Fertility in Domestic Species.” Reproduction 134: 3–17. doi:10.1530/REP-07-0046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Moreno, J., M. C. Esteso, S. Villaverde-Morcillo, A. Toledano-Díaz, C. Castaño, R. Velázquez, A. López-Sebastian, A. L. Goya, and J. G. Martinez. 2016. “Recent Advances in Bird Spermatozoa Morphometric Analysis and Its Role in Male Gamete Characterization and Reproduction Technologies.” Asian Journal of Andrology 18: 882–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellem, E., M. L. Broekhuijse, L. Chevrier, S. Camugli, E. Schmitt, L. Schibler, and E. P. Koenen. 2015. “Use of Combinations of in Vitro Quality Assessments to Predict Fertility of Bovine Semen.” Theriogenology 84: 1447–1454. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikka, S. C., and W. J. Hellstrom. 2016. “Current Updates on Laboratory Techniques for the Diagnosis of Male Reproductive Failure.” Asian Journal of Andrology 18: 392–401. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.179161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tominaga, H., M. Ishiyama, F. Ohseto, K. Sasamoto, T. Hamamoto, K. Suzuki, and M. Watanabe. 1999. “A Water-Soluble Tetrazolium Salt Useful for Colorimetric Cell Viability Assay.” Analytical Communications 36: 47–50. doi:10.1039/a809656b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar