Effect of chicken meat replacement by spent laying hen meat on physicochemical properties and sensorial characteristics of fresh sausage

References

• Abe, S., A. Hirata, T. Kimura, and K. Yamauchi. 1996. “Effects of Collagen on the Toughness of Meat from Spent Laying Hens.” Journal of the Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 43: 831–834. doi:10.3136/nskkk.43.831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arildsen Jakobsen, L. M., S. Vuholm, M. D. Aaslyng, M. Kristensen, K. V. Sørensen, A. Raben, and U. Kehlet. 2014. “Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Liking of Sausages with 10% Fat and Added Rye or Wheat Bran.” Food Science and Nutrition 2: 534–546. doi:10.1002/fsn3.126.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Official Analytical Chemistry AOAC. 2007. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg: Association of Official Analytical Chemists - AOAC Internacional.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, D., M. Sinhamahapatra, and S. Biswas. 2007. “Preparation of Sausage from Spent Duck–An Acceptability Study.” International Journal of Food Science &And Technology 42: 24–29. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01194.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, S., A. Chakraborty, and S. Sarkar. 2006. “Comparison among the Qualities of Patties Prepared from Chicken Broiler, Spent Hen and Duck Meats.” The Journal of Poultry Science 43: 180–186. doi:10.2141/jpsa.43.180.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, E. G., and W. J. Dyer. 1959. “A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification.” Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 911–917. doi:10.1139/o59-099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borges, Â. D. S., J. F. F. Zapata, D. D. S. Garruti, M. D. C. P. Rodrigues, E. R. Freitas, and A. L. F. Pereira. 2006. “Medições instrumentais e sensoriais de dureza e suculência na carne caprina.” Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 26: 891–896. doi:10.1590/S0101-20612006000400028.
   Google Scholar
• Brahma, M. L., P. L. N. Narayana Rao, and D. R. Nath. 1984. “Comparative Study of Certain Qualitative Characteristics of Duck and Hen Meat: PH, Water Holding Capacity and Palatability Characteristics of Meat.” Indian Veterinary Journal 61: 978–983.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 2000 March. Instrução Normativa n.º 04, de 31 de Março de 2000. Dispões sobre os regulamentos técnicos de identidade e qualidade de linguiça. Brasília-DF: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J., X. L. Xu, G. H. Zhou, C. B. Li, and M. Huang. 2012. “Effects of Characteristics Changes of Collagen on Meat Physicochemical Properties of Beef Semitendinosus Muscle during Ultrasonic Processing.” Food and Bioprocess Technology 5: 285–297. doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0269-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daillant-Spinnler, B., H. J. H. Macfie, P. K. Beyts, and D. Hedderley. 1996. “Relationships between Perceived Sensory Properties and Major Preference Directions of 12 Varieties of Apples from the Southern Hemisphere.” Food Quality and Preference 7: 113–126. doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95)00043-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza, K. M. R., R. B. Araujo, A. L. Santos, C. E. C. Rodrigues, D. E. Faria, and M. A. Trinade. 2011. “Adding Value to the Meat of Spent Laying Hens Manufacturing Sausages with a Healthy Appeal.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 13: 57–63. doi:10.1590/S1516-635X2011000100009.
   Google Scholar
• Embrapa (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) suÍnos e aves. 2003. “Sistema de produção de frango de corte.” http://sistemadeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Legarreta, I., and Y. H. Hui. 2010. Processed Poultry Products: A Primer. Handbook of Poultry Science and Technology, Secondary Processing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• IBGE (Instituo Brasileiro de Geografia E Estatística). 2018. “Censo Agropecuário da Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal.” <www.ibge.gov.br>
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. K., I. S. Kim, H. J. Jung, D. H. Kim, Y. J. Choi, and S. J. Hur. 2007. “The Development of Sausage Including Meat from Spent Laying Hen Surimi.” Poultry Science 86: 2676–2684. doi:10.3382/ps.2006-00451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. K., I. S. Kim, H. J. Jung, D. H. Kim, Y. J. Choi, and S. J. Hur. 2011. “Effect of Cryoprotectants on Chemical, Mechanical and Sensorial Characteristics of Spent Laying Hen Surimi.” Food and Bioprocess Technology 4: 1407–1413. doi:10.1007/s11947-010-0392-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrie, R. A. 1998. “Chemical and Biochemical Constitutes of Muscle.” In Lawrie’s Meat Science, edited by R. A. Lawrie, 79–80. 6th ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lira, G. 1997. “Influência do colágeno sobre a textura de carnes.” Higiene Alimentar 11: 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Loetscher, Y., D. Albiker, R. Stephan, M. Kreuzer, and R. E. Messikommer. 2015. “Differences between Spent Hens of Different Genotype in Performance, Meat Yield and Suitability of the Meat for Sausage Production.” Animal 9: 347–355. doi:10.1017/S1751731114002468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, J. M., and J. Carballo. 2015. “Changes in Physico-Chemical Properties and Volatile Compounds Throughout the Manufacturing Process of Dry-Cured Foal Loin.” Meat Science 99: 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, J. M., M. V. Sarriés, A. Tateo, P. Polidori, D. Franco, and M. Lanza. 2014. “Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality and Nutritional Value of Horsemeat: A Review.” Meat Science 96: 1478–1488. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, B. G., and C. E. Lyon. 1997. “Sensory Descriptive Profile Relationships to Shear Values of Deboned Poultry.” Journal of Food Science 62: 885–897. doi:10.1111/jfds.1997.62.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilgaard, M. C., G. V. Civille, and B. T. Carr. 2006. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura, T. 2010. “The Role of Intramuscular Connective Tissue in Meat Texture.” Animal Science Journal 81: 21–27. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00696.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novello, D., A. Marques, E. R. L. Toneto, and M. A. R. Pollonio. 2009. “Atributos de qualidade funcional de peito de frango injetado com cloreto de sódio e cálcio.” Alimentação e Nutrição 20: 403–410.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T. P., M. A. Trindade, E. M. M. Ortega, and C. J. C. Castillo. 2006. “Aceitação sensorial de reestruturados empanados elaborados com filé de peito de galinhas matrizes de corte e poedeiras comerciais.” Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 26: 841–846. doi:10.1590/S0101-20612006000400020.
   Google Scholar
• Olivo, R. 2006. O Mundo Do Frango: Cadeia Produtiva Da Carne De Frango. Criciúma/SC, ed, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, E., and L. Gomide. 2009. Avaliação da qualidade de carnes: Fundamentos e metodologias, 1ª reimpressão, 599. Viçosa MG: Editora UFV.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. D. 1999. Meat and Meat Products Technology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Tarté, R. Ed. 2009. Ingredients in Meat Products: Properties, Functionality and Applications. New York, NY: Springer Science &and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Terra, N. N. 1998. Apontamentos sobre tecnologia de carnes. Brazil: Editora Unisinos.
   Google Scholar
• Trindade, M. A., C. C. Contreras, and P. E. Felício. 2005. “Mortadella Sausage Formulations with Partial and Total Replacement of Beef and Pork Backfat with Mechanically Separated Meat from Spent Layer Hens.” Journal of Food Science 70: S236–S241. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanusso, J. T., and N. J. Dionello. 2003. “Produção avícola alternativa: Análise dos fatores qualitativos da carne de frangos de corte tipo caipira.” Revista Brasileira de Agrociência 9: 191–194.
   Google Scholar