283
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Immunology, Health and Disease

Survivability, immunity, growth and production traits in indigenous and White Leghorn breeds of chicken

, , &
Pages 683-690 | Received 25 Oct 2018, Accepted 25 May 2019, Published online: 02 Aug 2019

References

  • Anonymous. 2011. “Breed Descriptor of Chicken.” Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 81 (3): 310–323.
  • Berghof, T. V., S. A. Van der klein, J. A. Arts, H. K. Parmentier, J. J. Van der poel, and H. Bovenhuis. 2015. “Genetic and Non-genetic Inheritance of Natural Antibodies Binding Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin in a Purebred Layer Chicken Line.” PLoS One, June 26 10 (6): e0131088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131088.
  • Besbes, B. 2009. “Genotype Evaluation and Breeding of Poultry for Performance under Sub-optimal Village Conditions.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 65: 260–271. doi:10.1017/S0043933909000221.
  • Chatterjee, R. N., and S. P. Yadav. 2008. “Farming System of Nicobari Fowl – An Endangered Breed of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 4: 245–256. doi:10.1017/S0043933908000032.
  • Cotter, P. F. 1998. “Naturally Occurring Rabbit Erythrocyte Agglutinins in Fowl Sera.” Poultry Science 77 (Suppl. 1): 100. (Abstr.).
  • Cotter, P. F., J. Ayoub, and H. K. Parmentier. 2005. “Directional Selection for Specific Sheep Cell Antibody Responses Affects Natural Rabbit Agglutinins of Chickens.” Poultry Science 84: 220–225. doi:10.1093/ps/84.2.220.
  • Emam, M., H. Mehrabani-yeganeh, N. Barjesteh, G. Nikbakht, K. Thompson-crispi, S. Charkhkar, and B. Mallard. 2014. “The Influence of Genetic Background versus Commercial Breeding Programs on Chicken Immunocompetence.” Poultry Science 93: 77–84. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03475.
  • Haunshi, S., M. Niranjan, M. Shanmugam, M. K. Padhi, M. R. Reddy, R. Sunitha, U. Rajkumar, and A. K. Panda. 2011. “Characterization of Two Indian Native Chicken Breeds for Production, Egg and Semen Quality, and Welfare Traits.” Poultry Science 90: 314–320. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-01013.
  • Haunshi, S., M. Shanmugam, U. Rajkumar, M. K. Padhi, and M. Niranjan. 2015. “Characterization of Ghagus Breed Vis-a-vis PD–4 Birds for Production, Adaptability, Semen and Egg Quality Traits”.” Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85 (12): 1338–1342.
  • Haunshi, S., R. Sunitha, M. Shanmugam, M. K. Padhi, and M. Niranjan. 2013. “Carcass Characteristics and Chemical Composition of Breast and Thigh Muscles of Native Chicken Breeds.” Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48 (2): 219–222.
  • Holodick, N. E., N. Rodríguez-zhurbenko, and A. M. Hernández. 2017. “Defining Natural Antibodies.” Frontiers in Immunology 8: 872. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00872.
  • Kundu, A., A. K. De, M. S. Kundu, J. Sunder, S. Jeyakumr, and T. Sujatha. 2015. “Production Performance of Indigenous Nicobari Fowls, Vanaraja and Their Various F1 Crosses under Hot Humid Climate of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India.” Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85 (2): 172–177.
  • Matson, K. D., R. E. Ricklefs, and K. C. Klasing. 2005. “A Hemolysis–Hemagglutination Assay for Characterizing Constitutive Innate Humoral Immunity in Wild and Domestic Birds”.” Developmental and Comparative Immunology 29: 275–286. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2004.09.004.
  • Minozzi, G., H. K. Parmentier, S. Mignon-grasteau, M. G. Nieuwland, B. Bed’hom, D. Gourichon, F. Minvielle, and M. H. Pinard-van Der laan. 2008. “Correlated Effects of Selection for Immunity in White Leghorn Chicken Lines on Natural Antibodies and Specific Antibody Responses to KLH and M. Butyricum.” BMC Genetics 14 (9): 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-9-5.
  • Ochsenbein, A. F., and R. M. Zinkernagel. 2000. “Natural Antibodies and Complement Link Innate and Acquired Immunity.” Immunology Today 21: 624–630.
  • Padhi, M. K., R. N. Chatterjee, S. Haunshi, and U. Rajkumar. 2013. “Effect of Age on Egg Quality in Chicken.” Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48 (1): 122–125.
  • Panda, S., and J. L. Ding. 2015. “Natural Antibodies Bridge Innate and Adaptive Immunity.” Journal of Immunology 194: 13–20. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1400844.
  • Parmentier, H. K., A. Lammers, J. J. Hoekman, G. De vries-reilingh, I. T. A. Zaanen, and H. F. J. Savelkoul. 2004. “Different Levels of Natural Antibodies in Chickens Divergently Selected for Specific Antibody Responses.” Developmental and Comparative Immunology 28: 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2003.11.001.
  • Rajkumar, U., M. V. L. N. Raju, M. Niranjan, S. Haunshi, M. K. Padhi, and S. V. Rama rao. 2014. “Evaluation of Egg Quality Traits in Native Aseel Chicken.” Indian Journal of Poultry Science 49 (3): 324–327.
  • Snyder, D. B., W. W. Marquardt, E. T. Mallinson, and E. Russek. 1983. “Rapid Serological Profiling by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay. 1. Measurement of Antibody Activity Titre against Newcastle Disease Virus in a Single Serum Dilution.” Avian Diseases 72: 161–170. doi:10.2307/1590381.
  • Star, L., K. Frankena, B. Kemp, M. G. B. Nieuwland, and H. K. Parmentier. 2007. “Natural Humoral Immune Competence and Survival in Layers.” Poultry Science 86: 1090–1099. doi:10.1093/ps/86.6.1196.
  • Suk, Y. O., and C. Park. 2001. “Effect of Breed and Age of Hens on the Yolk to Albumen Ratio in Two Different Genetic Stocks.” Poultry Science 80 (7): 855–858. doi:10.1093/ps/80.7.855.
  • Sun, Y., H. K. Parmentier, K. Frankena, and J. J. Van der poel. 2011. “Natural Antibody Isotypes Titres as Predictors of Survival in Purebred Laying Hens.” Poultry Science 90: 2263–2274. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01613.
  • Wijga, S., H. K. Parmentier, M. G. B. Nieuwland, and H. Bovenhuis. 2009. “Genetic Parameters for Levels of Natural Antibodies in Chicken Lines Divergently Selected for Specific Antibody Response.” Poultry Science 88: 1805–1810. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00064.
  • Wondmeneh, E., J. A. M. Van arendonk, E. H. Van der waaij, B. J. Ducro, And H. K. Parmentier. 2015. “High Natural Antibody Titres of Indigenous Chickens are Related with Increased Hazard in Confinement.” Poultry Science 94: 1493–1498. doi:10.3382/ps/pev107.
  • Zhang, H. M., H. D. Hunt, G. B. Kulkarni, D. E. Palmquist, and L. D. Bacon. 2006. “Lymphoid Organ Size Varies among Inbred Lines 63 and 72 and Their Thirteen Recombinant Congenic Strains of Chickens with the Same Major Histocompatibility Complex.” Poultry Science 85: 844–853. doi:10.1093/ps/85.12.2270.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.