The effect of litter materials on broiler performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Abreu, V. M. N., P. G. Abreu, D. D. P. Paiva, A. Coldebella, F. R. F. Jaenisch, T. Cestonaro, and V. S. Silva. 2013. “Evaluation of Soybean Straw as Litter Material in Poultry Production and Substrate in Composting of Broiler Carcasses.” Embrapa Suínos E Aves. doi: 10.5772/54068.
   Google Scholar
• Agfacts. 2004. Alternative Litter Materials for Poultry. 1st ed. I. S. Emburyeds 1987, Former, Livestock Officer (Poultry) Division of Animal Production (Reviewed April 2004). Accessed 30 April 2019. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/134446/Alternative-litter-materials-for-poultry.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amer, F. M., F. N. Soliman, M. Bahie El-Deen, and A. El-Sebai. 2015. “Effect of Diet Forms and Litter Types on the Productive Traits of Broiler (sasso).” Egyptian Poultry Science Journal 35 (III): 719–734.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, J. C., E. Gonzales, N. Kondo, N. H. Anzai, and M. M. Cabral. 1997. “Material De Cama: Qualidade, Quantidade E Efeito Sobre O Desempenho De Frangos De Corte.” Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia 26 (1): 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, J. S., V. D. Oliveira, and G. C. Braga. 2007. “Desempenho De Frangos De Corte Criados Em Diferentes Tipos De Cama E Taxa De Lotação.” Ciência Animal Brasileira 8 (1): 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Asaniyan, E. K., J. O. Agbede, and E. A. O. Laseinde. 2007. “Impact Assessment of Different Litter Depths on the Performance of Broiler Chickens Raised on Sand and Wood Shaving Litters.” World Journal of Zoology 2 (2): 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Benabdeljelil, K., and A. Ayachi. 1996. “Evaluation of Alternative Litter Materials for Poultry.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 5 (3): 203–209. doi:10.1093/japr/5.3.203.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, J. 2009. “Effect of Litter Type on Prevalence and Severity of Pododermatitis in Male Broilers.” Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 122(7–8): 257–263. English Abstract (language: German).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili, S. F., G. I. Montenegro, J. B. Hess, and M. K. Eckman. 1999. “Sand as Litter for Rearing Broiler Chickens.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8 (3): 345–351. doi:10.1093/japr/8.3.345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, B. D., J. B. Hess, S. F. Bilgili, J. P. Blake, and M. K. Eckman. 2003a. “Sand Litter Temperatures during Brooding.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12 (3): 271–274. doi:10.1093/japr/12.3.271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, B. D., J. B. Hess, S. F. Bilgili, J. P. Blake, M. K. Eckman, and E. A. Guertal. 2003b. “Nutrient Buildup in Sand Litter.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12 (4): 522–525. doi:10.1093/japr/12.4.522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brake, J. D., C. R. Boyle, T. N. Chamblee, C. D. Schultz, and E. D. Peebles. 1992. “Evaluation of the Chemical and Physical Properties of Hardwood Bark Used as Broiler Litter Material.” Poultry Science 71 (3): 467–472. doi:10.3382/ps.0710467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, D. A. P., D. R. B. Brito, A. M. N. Gomes, A. S. Cunha, U. A. S. Filho, and A. A. Pinheiro. 2016. “Desempenho Produtivo E Rendimento De Carcaça De Frangos Criados Em Diferentes Materiais De Cama Aviária.” Ciência Animal Brasileira 17 (2): 192–197. doi:10.1590/1089-6891v17i220736.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti, R. A., D. F. Graner, F. F. Andrade, A. M. Almeida, and E. A. Rodrigues. 2010. “Influência De Diferentes Tipos De Camas No Desempenho De Frangos De Corte Na Terceira Semana Do Lote”. Poster presented at the III Seminário de iniciação científica e inovação tecnológica, Uberaba.
   Google Scholar
• Coveña, A. E. V., and B. O. Q. Villamar. 2015. “Evaluación De Cuatro Tipos De Cama En La Crianza De Pollos Parilleros Y Sus Efectos Sobre Salud, Ambiente Y Parámetros Productivos.” Tesis de grado previo a la obtención del título de médico veterinario zootecnista, Universidad Técnica De Manabí.
   Google Scholar
• Cressman, M. D. 2014. “Effects of Litter Reuse on Performance, Welfare, and the Microbiome of the Litter and Gastrointestinal Tract of Commercial Broiler Chickens.” Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Dai Prá, M. A., and V. F. B. Roll. 2015. Poultry Litter: Use, Reuse and Disposal, 96 p. 1st ed. Porto Alegre: Evangraf.
   Google Scholar
• Davasgaium, M. M., and A. A. Boodoo. 1997. “Litter Management: Use of Bagasse as a Potential Source of Litter Material for Broiler Production.” Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of Agricultural Scientists: 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. D., J. L. Purswell, and A. S. Kiess. 2015. “Evaluation of Chopped Switchgrass and Chopped Bermudagrass as Litter Materials over Multiple Heavy Broiler Flocks1.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 24 (3): 343–351. doi:10.3382/japr/pfv034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewanti, A. C., P. E. Santosa, and K. Nova. 2014. “Pengaruh Berbagai Jenis Bahan Litter Terhadap Respon Fisiologis Broiler Fase Finisher Di Closed House.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu 2 (3): 81–87. ( Language: Indonesian).
   Google Scholar
• El-Deek, A. A., M. A. Al-Harthi, M. M. Khalifah, M. M. Elbanoby, and T. Alharby. 2011. “Impact of Newspaper as Bedding Material in Arid Land on Broiler Performance.” Egypt Poultry Science 31 (IV): 715–725.
   Google Scholar
• El-Wahab, H. A. 2011. “Experimental Studies on Effects of Diet Composition (electrolyte Contents), Litter Quality (type, Moisture) and Infection (coccidia) on the Development and Severity of Foot Pad Dermatitis in Young Turkeys Housed with or without Floor Heating.” Doctoral dissertation, Hannover, Germany: University of Veterinary Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, L. W., R. G. Garcia, I. A. Nääs, F. R. Caldara, and N. D. S. Lima. 2011. “Volatilização De Amônia Em Diferentes Tipos De Cama Para Frangos De Corte.” Revista Brasileira De Engenharia De Biossistemas 5 (3): 142–151. doi:10.18011/bioeng2011v5n3p142-151.
   Google Scholar
• Garcês, A., S. M. S. Afonso, A. Chilundo, and C. T. S. Jairoce. 2013. “Evaluation of Different Litter Materials for Broiler Production in a Hot and Humid Environment: 1. Litter Characteristics and Quality.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22 (2): 168–176. doi:10.3382/japr.2012-00547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcês, A. P. J. T., S. M. S. Afonso, A. Chilundo, and C. T. S. Jairoce. 2017. “Evaluation of Different Litter Materials for Broiler Production in a Hot and Humid Environment: 2. Productive Performance and Carcass Characteristics.” Tropical Animal Health and Production 49 (2): 369–374. doi:10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HCC. Hybu Cig Cymru. 2010. “Alternative Bedding Materials for Beef and Sheep Housing Systems in Wales.” Meat Promotion Wales Aberystwyth, Wales, UK. Accessed 30 April 2019. https://hccmpw.org.uk/en/industry-resources/animal-health-and-welfare/woodchip-for-livestock-bedding-project
   Google Scholar
• HCCMPW. 2008. The Woodchip for Livestock Bedding Project. In Hybu Cig Cymru – Meat Promotion Wales. Aberystwyth, Wales, UK: Hybu Cig Cymru. Accessed 30 April 2019. https://hccmpw.org.uk/images//resources/The_Woodchip_for_Livestock_Bedding_Project_(Final_report).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., and S. G. Thompson. 2002. “Quantifying Heterogeneity in a Meta-analysis.” Statistic in Medicine 21 (11): 1539–1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., J. S. Yoo, H. J. Kim, Y. Wang, Y. J. Chen, J. H. Cho, and I. H. Kim. 2009. “Effect of Bedding Types and Different Nutrient Densities on Growth Performance, Visceral Organ Weight, and Blood Characteristics in Broiler Chickens.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18 (1): 1–7. doi:10.3382/japr.2007-00069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kains, F., B. Lovell, M. Payne, and R. Tremblay. 2008. Livestock Bedding Alternatives. Toronto, Canada: Factsheet: Queens’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Lean, I. J., P. Celi, H. Raadsma, J. McNamara, and A. R. Rabiee. 2012. “Effects of Dietary Crude Protein on Fertility: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 171 (1): 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, I. J., A. R. Rabiee, T. F. Duffield, and I. R. Dohoo. 2009. “Invited Review: Use of Meta-analysis in Animal Health and Reproduction: Methods and Applications.” Journal of Dairy Science 92 (8): 3545–3565. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, I. J., J. M. Thompson, and F. R. Dunshea. 2014. “A Meta-Analysis of Zilpaterol and Ractopamine Effects on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits and Shear Strength of Meat in Cattle.” Plos One 9 (12): e115904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, R. J., K. S. Macklin, J. B. Hess, W. A. Dozier, and S. F. Bilgili. 2008. “Effects of Early Skip-a-day Feed Removal and Litter Material on Broiler Live and Processing Performance and Litter Bacterial Levels.” International Journal of Poultry Science 7 (2): 110–116. doi:10.3923/ijps.2008.110.116.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, G. C., P. C. Sherertz, C. W. Armstrong, G. B. Miller Jr, J. D. Reynolds, T. D. Kimbrough, G. A. Bean, et al. 1988. “Mycotoxigenic Isolates and Toxin Production on Buckwheat and Rice Hulls Used as Bedding Materials.” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 3 (6): 351–356. doi:10.1007/BF01569556.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, M., V. F. B. Roll, F. L. Leite, M. A. Dai Prá, E. G. Xavier, T. Heres, and B. S. Valente. 2013. “Quicklime Treatment and Stirring of Different Poultry Litter Substrates for Reducing Pathogenic Bacteria Counts.” Poultry Science 92 (3): 638–644. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansaray, K. G., and A. E. Ghaly. 1997. “Physical and Thermochemical Properties of Rice Husk.” Energy Sources 19 (9): 989–1004. doi:10.1080/00908319708908904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., C. Fabbri, E. Folegatti, and F. Sirri. 2008. “Effect of Less Intensive Rearing Conditions on Litter Characteristics, Growth Performance, Carcass Injuries and Meat Quality of Broilers.” British Poultry Science 49 (5): 509–515. doi:10.1080/00071660802290424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLOS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neme, R., N. K. Sakomura, M. D. S. Oliveira, F. A. Longo, and A. N. Figueiredo. 2000. “Adição De Gesso Agrícola Em Três Tipos De Cama De Aviário Na Fixação De Nitrogênio E No Desempenho De Frango De Corte.” Ciência Rural 30 (4): 687–692. doi:10.1590/S0103-84782000000400022.
   Google Scholar
• Noble Vela, J. A. 2013. “Efecto De Tres Camas Sobre Problemas De Patas Y Pechugas De Pollos Broilers, En Santo Domingo De Los Tsáchilas”. Bachelor’s thesis, Quevedo: Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo.
   Google Scholar
• North, M. O., and D. D. Bell. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer US, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Nowaczewski, S., A. Rosinski, M. Markiewicz, and H. Kontecka. 2011. “Performance, Foot-pad Dermatitis and Haemoglobin Saturation in Broiler Chickens Kept on Different Types of Litter.” Archiv Für Geflügelkunde 75 (2): 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M. C., C. V. Almeida, D. O. Andrade, and S. M. M. Rodrigues. 2003. “Teor De Matéria Seca, Ph E Amônia Volatilizada Da Cama De Frango Tratada Ou Não Com Diferentes Aditivos.” Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia 32 (4): 951–954. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982003000400022.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M. C., E. A. Bento, F. I. Carvalho, and S. M. M. Rodrigues. 2005. “Características Da Cama E Desempenho De Frangos De Corte Criados Em Diferentes Densidades Populacionais E Tipos De Cama.” Ars Veterinaria 21 (3): 303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, T. M. 1940. “Absorptive Capacity of Different Materials Ordinarily Used for Bedding.” Journal of Dairy Science 23 (4): 355–360. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(40)95534-5.
   Google Scholar
• Onu, P. N., F. N. Madubuike, P. E. Nwakpu, and A. I. Anyaehie. 2011. “Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Broilers Raised on Three Different Litter Materials.” Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2 (10): 1347–1350. doi:10.5251/abjna.2011.2.10.1347.1350.
   Google Scholar
• Petek, M., H. Üstüner, and D. Yeşilbağ. 2014. “Effects of Stocking Density and Litter Type on Litter Quality and Growth Performance of Broiler Chicken.” Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesidergisi 20 (5): 743–748. doi:10.9775/kvfd.2014.11016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, S. 2002. “Alternative Bedding Material. In Extension Extra: South Dakota State University.” South Dakota, USA. Accessed 17 October 2017. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1006&context=extension_extra
   Google Scholar
• Rabiee, A. R., K. Breinhild, W. Scott, H. M. Golder, E. Block, and I. J. Lean. 2012. “Effect of Fat Additions to Diets of Dairy Cattle on Milk Production and Components: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.” Journal of Dairy Science 95 (6): 3225–3247. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, S. G. A., and S. Z. El-Khloya. 2017. “Do Alternative Litter Materials Affect Performance, Welfare and Immune Response of Broiler Chicks?” Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences 52 (1): 133–141. doi:10.5455/ajvs.256271.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, S. G. A., H. D. Mahboub, M. A. Helal, and K. M. Gaafar. 2013. “Behaviour, Welfare And Performance Of Broiler Chicks Reared On Different Litter Materials.” Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 59 (138): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Roccon, J. 2014. “Desempenho De Frangos De Corte E Produção De Energia Em Biodigestores, Utilizando-se Três Tipos De Cama.” Diss., Universidade Estadual Paulista.
   Google Scholar
• Sarica, M., and M. A. Cam. 2000. “Potential of Hazelnut Husks as a Broiler Litter Material.” British Poultry Science 41 (5): 541–543. doi:10.1080/713654977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirri, F., G. Minelli, E. Folegatti, S. Lolli, and A. Meluzzi. 2007. “Foot Dermatitis and Productive Traits in Broiler Chickens Kept with Different Stocking Densities, Litter Types and Light Regimen.” Italian Journal of Animal Science 6 (1): 734–736. doi:10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.734.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman, E. S., S. A. Moawed, and R. A. Hassan. 2017. “Influence of Microclimatic Ammonia Levels on Productive Performance of Different Broilers’ Breeds Estimated with Univariate and Multivariate Approaches.” Veterinary World 10 (8): 880. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2017.679-687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara, J. O. B., M. F. Rizzo, A. C. Laurentiz, R. P. Schocken-Iturrino, T. T. Berchielli, and V. M. B. Moraes. 2000. “Avaliação Da Polpa De Citros Peletizada Como Material Para Cama De Frangos De Corte.” Revista Brasileira De Ciência Avícola 2 (3): 273–280. doi:10.1590/S1516-635X2000000300010.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, L. F. A., N. T. Massaranduba, I. A. Ruiz, A. S. Gomes, A. P. S. Costa, and A. F. G. Silva. 2016. “Desempenho, Rendimento De Carcaça E Comportamento De Frangos De Corte Criados Em Cama De Maravalha Ou Areia.” Colloquium Agrariae 12 (2): 06–11. doi:10.5747/ca.2016.v12.n2.a134.
   Google Scholar
• Taherparvar, G., A. Seidavi, L. Asadpour, R. Payan-Carreira, V. Laudadio, and V. Tufarelli. 2016. “Effect of Litter Treatment on Growth Performance, Intestinal Development, and Selected Cecum Microbiota in Broiler Chickens.” Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia 45 (5): 257–264. doi:10.1590/S1806-92902016000500008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, A. S., M. C. Oliveira, J. F. Menezes, B. M. Gouvea, S. R. Teixeira, and A. R. Gomes. 2015. “Poultry Litter of Wood Shavings And/or Sugarcane Bagasse: Animal Performance and Bed Quality.” Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias 28 (3): 238–246. doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n3a4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W.; Metafor. 2010. “Conducting Meta-analyses in R with the Metafor Package.” Journal of Statistical Software 36: 3. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyles, R., and M. S. Honeyman. 2006. “Absorbency of Alternative Livestock Bedding Sources.” Animal industry report. Accessed 18 October 2017. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1190&context=ans_air
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C., I. J. Dahabreh, T. A. Trikalinos, J. Lau, P. Trow, and C. H. Schmid; OpenMetaAnalyst. 2012. “Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End.” Journal of Statistical Software 49: 5. doi:10.18637/jss.v049.i05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. L., J. E. Wohlt, and S. E. Katz. 2001. “Chemical, Physical, and Environmental Properties of Pelleted Newspaper Compared to Wheat Straw and Wood Shavings as Bedding for Horses.” Journal of Animal Science 79 (6): 1359–1369. doi:10.2527/2001.793678x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. L., J. E. Wohlt, P. K. Zajac, and K. R. Cooper. 2000. “Chemical and Physical Properties of Processed Newspaper Compared to Wheat Straw and Wood Shavings as Animal Bedding.” Journal of Dairy Science 83 (2): 359–367. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74887-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar