Sound exposure and its beneficial effects on embryonic growth and hatching of broiler chicks

References

• ABNT – Brazilian Association of Technical Standards. 1987. NBR 10151: Noise levels for acoustic comfort. Rio de Janeiro, p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Alladi, P. A., T. Roy, N. Singh, and S. Wadhwa. 2005. “Prenatal Auditory Enrichment with Species-specific Calls and Sitar Music Modulates Expression. Of Bcl-2 and a Bax to Alter Programmed Cell Death in Developing Chick Auditory Nuclei.” International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 23: 363–373. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARCHER, G. S., 2018. “Effect Of Two Different Commercially Available White Light Led Fixtures on Broiler Hatchability and Chick Quality.” British Poultry Science 59 (3): 251–255.doi:10.1080/00071668.2018.1436160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, G. S., and J. A. Mench. 2013. “The Effects of Light Stimulation during Incubation on Indicators of Stress Susceptibility in Broilers.” Poultry Science 92: 3103–3108. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergoug, H., C. Burel, M. Guinebretière, Q. Tong, N. Roulston, C.E.B. Romanini, V. Exadaktylos, et al. 2013. “Effect of Pre-Incubation and Incubation Conditions on Hatchability, Hatch Time and Hatch Window, and Effect of Post-hatch Handling on Chick Quality at Placement.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 69 :312–334. doi:10.1017/S0043933913000329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouček, J. 2014. “Effect of Noise on Performance, Stress, and Behaviour of Animals.” Slovak Journal Animal Science 47: 111–123. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20143317356
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhury, S., T. C. Nag, and S. Wadhwa. 2009. “Effect of Prenatal Auditory Stimulation on Numerical Synaptic Density and Mean Synaptic Height in the Post Hatch Day 1 Chick Hippocampus.” Synapse 63: 152–159. doi:10.1002/syn.20585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, E., and V. Bruggeman. 2007. “The Endocrine Interface of Environmental and Egg Factors Affecting Chick Quality.” Poultry Science 86 (5): 1037–1042. doi:10.1093/ps/86.5.1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, L. M., N. H. C. Sparks, and K. M. D. Rutherford. 2015. “Early Experiences Matter: A Review of the Effects of Prenatal Environment on Offspring Characteristics in Poultry.” Poultry Science: 1–11. doi:10.3382/ps/pev343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donofre, A. C., I. J. O. Silva, A. C. Nazarzeno, and I. E. P. Ferreira. 2017. “Mechanical Vibrations in the Transport of Hatching Eggs and the Losses Caused in the Hatch and Quality of Broiler Chicks.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering 48 (1): 36–41. doi:10.4081/jae.2017.593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donofre, A. C., I. J. O. Silva, and S. L. Castro-Júnior. 2018. “The Sensor to Estimate the Sound Pressure Level in Eggs.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 154: 420–425. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, J., S. Held, C. Jones, and C. Troisi. 2016. “Influences of Maternal Care on Chicken Welfare.” Animals 6: 1–12. doi:10.3390/ani6010002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M. R., B. Greenlees, and I. J. H. Duncan. 1995. United States Patent: Method and apparatus for increasing the quantity and improving the quality of hatchlings incubated and hatched under artificial conditions by exposing the eggs to natural sounds. Patent Number: 5.383.424.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S., R. Sharma, and S. Wadhwa. 2004. “Effect of Prenatal Species-specific and Music Stimulation on the Postnatal Auditory Preference of Domestic Chick.” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 48: 174–183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15521556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, T. A., S. M. Jones, and K. C. Paggett. 2006. “Emergence of Hearing in the Chicken Embryo.” Journal of Neurophysiology 96: 128–141. doi:10.1152/jn.00599.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauser, H., S. Roy, A. Pal, V. Sreenivas, R. Mathur, S. Wadhwa, and S. Jain. 2011. “Prenatal Complex Rhythmic Music Sound Stimulation Facilitates Postnatal Spatial Learning but Transiently Impairs Memory in the Domestic Chick.” Developmental Neuroscience 33: 48–56. doi:10.1159/000322449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesar, A. G. 2013. “Effect of Prenatal Chronic Excessive Sound Exposure on Auditory Filial Imprinting Area of Chick Forebrain.” Journal of the Anatomical Society of India 62: 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.jasi.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løtvedt, P., and P. Jensen. 2014. “Effects of Hatching Time on Behavior and Weight Development of Chickens.” PloS One 9 (7): 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariette, M. M., and K. L. Buchanan. 2016. “Prenatal Acoustic Communication Programs Offspring for High Posthatching Temperatures in a Songbird.” Science 353 (6301): 812–814. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangsuay, A., Y. Ruangpanit, R. Meijerhof, and S. Attamangkune. 2011. “Yolk Absorption and Embryo Development of Small and Large Eggs Originating from Young and Old Breeder Hens.” Poultry Science 90: 2648–2655. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan, S., S. Yalçin, B. Babacanoğlu, H. Kozanoğlu, F. Karadaş, and S. Uysal. 2012. “Photoperiodic Lighting (16 Hours of Light:8 Hours of Dark) Programs during Incubation: 1. Effects on Growth and Circadian Physiological Traits of Embryos and Early Stress Response of Broiler Chickens.” Poultry Science 91: 2912–2921. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2017. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, M., M. I. M. Louder, S. Kleindorfer, W. Liu, and M. E. Hauber. 2018. “Avian Prenatal Auditory Stimulation: Progress and Perspectives.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72: 112. doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2528-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S., T. C. Nag, A. D. Upadhyay, R. Mathur, and S. Jain. 2014. “Prenatal Music Stimulation Facilitates the Postnatal Functional Development of the Auditory as Well as Visual System in Chicks (gallus Domesticus).” Journal of Biosciences 39: 107–117. doi:10.1007/s12038-013-9401-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumpf, M., and B. Tzschentke. 2010. “Perinatal Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Vocalize in the Egg?” The Open Ornithology Journal 3: 141–149. doi:10.2174/1874453201003010141.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, T., P. Palanisamy, T. C. Nag, T. S. Roy, and S. Wadhwa. 2013b. “Effect of Prenatal Loud Music and Noise on Total Number of Neurons and Glia, Neuronal Nuclear Area and Volume of Chick Brainstem Auditory Nuclei, Field L and Hippocampus: A Stereological Investigation.” International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 31: 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, T., V. Kumar, T. C. Nag, S. Jain, and V. Sreenivas. 2013a. “Prenatal Loud Music and Noise: Differential Impact on Physiological Arousal, Hippocampal Synaptogenesis and Spatial Behavior in One Day-old Chicks.” PloS One 8: 16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, S. G., A. W. Moran, and L. C. Shackelford. 1994. “Effect of Vibration Frequency and Amplitude in Developing Chicken Embryos.” US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Report 95 (1): 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sozcu, A., and A. Ipek. 2015. “Quality Assessment Chicks from Different Hatcher Temperatures with Different Scoring Methods and Prediction of Broiler Growth Performance.” Journal of Applied Animal Research 43 (4): 409–416. doi:10.1080/09712119.2014.978784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tona, K., O. M. Onagbesan, B. Kamers, N. Everaert, V. Bruggeman, and E. Decuypere. 2010. "Comparison Of Cobb and Ross Strains in Embryo Physiology and Chick Juvenile Growth." Poultry Science 89 (8) : 1677–1683.doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00386
   Google Scholar
• Tong, Q., C. E. B. Romanini, V. Exadaktylos, C. Bahr, D. Berckmans, H. Bergoug, N. Eterradoss, et al. 2013. “Embryonic Development and the Physiological Factors that Coordinate Hatching in Domestic Chickens.” Poultry Science 92: 620–628. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Q., I. M. Mcgonnell, C. E. B. Romanini, H. Bergoug, N. Roulston, V. Exadaktylos, D. Berckmansc, et al. 2015. “Effect of Species-specific Sound Stimulation on the Development and Hatching of Broiler Chicks.” British Poultry Science 56: 143–148. doi:10.1080/00071668.2014.1000822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torma, T., and K. G. Kovácsné. 2012. “Effects of Mechanical Impacts on Hatchability of Broiler Breeders.” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 4: 535–540.
   Google Scholar
• Tzschentke, B., and A. Plagemann. 2006. “Imprinting and Critical Periods in Early Development.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 62: 626–637. doi:10.1017/S0043933906001176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, L. J. F., A. V. Van Wagenberg, K. A. Uitdehaag, P. W. G. Groot Koerkam, B. Kemp, and H. Van den Brand. 2012. “Significance of Chick Quality Score in Broiler Production.” Animal 6 (10): 1677–1683. doi:10.1017/S1751731112000663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veteräny, L., S. Hluchý, and J. Červeňanová. 2005. “Effect of the Use of Synthetic Sound during Incubation in Chicken.” Journal of Agricultural Sciences 50: 131–138. http://joas.agrif.bg.ac.rs/archive/article/168
   Google Scholar
• Veteräny, L., S. Hluchý, and J. Weis. 1998. “The Influence of an Artificial Sound Stimulation on Chicken Hatching.” Czech Journal Animal Science 43: 177–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Z. Li, Z. Zhong, S. Jin, J. Pan, X. Rao, and Y. Yu. 2018. “Effect of Monochromatic Green LED Light Stimuli during Incubation on Embryo Growth, Hatching Performance, and Hormone Levels.” Transactions of the ASABE 61: 661–669. doi:10.13031/trans.12485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar