1
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion

Was Husserl a Fregean?

&
Pages 76-80 | Published online: 21 Oct 2014

References

  • Dagfinn Føllesdal, “Husserl's Notion of Noema”, Journal of Philosophy, 66, No. 20, Oct. 16, 1969; pp. 680–7. Føllesdal says: The Noema is not the Object of consciousness (Thesis 4; cf. Ideen I, pp. 128–9). The Noema was introduced in Ideen I, § 88. Cf. The Noema is a “generalization of the notion of Sinn to the field of all acts” Ideen 3, p. 89. Cf. Gurwitsch, Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966; pp. 116 ff., 131 ff. Gurwitsch tells us that the Noema is the bracketed “perceived as such” (Studies, p. 132).
  • Frege says: a sign is a “name, combination of words, letter” “….by ‘sign’ and ‘name’ I have here understood any designation representing a proper name, which has as its reference a definite object (the word taken in its widest range), but not a concept or a relation….” (“On Sense and Reference”, Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, by Peter Geach and Max Black, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, (2nd edn.) 1960; p. 57).
  • It is the imaginative variation of specific shades of blue that leads, by ‘abstractive ideation’, to what remains invariant in the specific instances: the genus or Eidos, ‘Blue’, see Experience and Judgment, ed. Ludwig Landgrebe, trs. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973; Pt. 3, ch. 2, esp. 87.
  • The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trs. David Carr, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970, cf. pp. 26, 35, also Appendix VI. “The Origin of Geometry”.
  • For example an object like a chair has a back and sides which we may not at that moment be actually perceiving, but which we infer are there.
  • Cf. Jean-Paul Sartre, “Intentionality: A Fundamental Idea of Husserl's Phenomenology”, trs. Joseph P. Fell, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vo. 1 No. 2, May 1970, p. 4.
  • In Quatrième Colloque de Royaument, published as la Philosophie analytique, Paris 1962.
  • Cf. Guido Küng, “Ingarden on Language and Ontology”, in Analecta Husserliana: Vol II, ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, Dordrecht; D. Reidel, 1972, p. 211. See also, Guido Küng, “The World as Noema and Referent”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 3, No. 1. January 1973.
  • Cf. The Idea of Phenomenology, trs. William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1964; lecture 2, esp. pp. 22–3. Erste Philosophie, vol. 1 (Husserliana, Vol. 7.), pp. 275 f., 361–62. Ibid. Vol. 2 (Husserliana, Vol. 8), supp. 3 to the 28th lect., pp. 320 ft., supp. 32 to the 54th lect., esp. pp. 498–504.
  • Ideas I, § 52, esp. p. 161; cf. also §§ 48–51.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.