References
- Gordon G. Globus, “The Temporality of Dreams: A Heideggerian Critique of Dennet's Dream Theory,” The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 17/2 (1986): pp. 186–191.
- A case in point is the way in which a bodily comportment like “breathing” can transmit the gathering power of the logos. See David Michael Levin, The Body's Recollection of Being (New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985), pp. 348–349.
- Globus, op. cit., pp. 188–190. As Globus points out in citing Medard Boss, “Dasein is unitary across waking and dreaming” (p. 189).
- Ricoeur's emphasis on the dream as a “text” and “narrativity” as the temporal ingredient for transmitting meaning indicates an important divergence from the ontological emphasis on the temporality of care. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy, trans. Denis Savage (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), pp,120ff.
- Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers Inc., 1962), pp. 244–256.
- SeeReiner Schürmann, Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987), pp. 3–15.
- SeeWilliam J. Richardson, “The Mirror Inside: The Problem of the Self,” in Heidegger and Psychology, ed.Keith Hoeller (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press International, 1988), pp. 100–106.
- SeeMedard Boss, “Martin Heidegger's Zollikon Seminars,” in Heidegger and Psychology pp. 7–20. Also see Richardson, “The Mirror Inside: The Problem of the Self,” pp. 95–112.
- SeeRichard M. Capobianco, “Heidegger and Jung: Dwelling Near the Source,” Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. XXI, 1,2,3 (1993): pp. 57–59.
- William J. Richardson, “The Place of the Unconscious in Heidegger,”in Heidegger and Psychology, p. 187.
- SeeThomas J. Sheehan, “Heidegger's Philosophy of Mind,” in Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, ed.Guttorm Floistad (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), p. 307.
- Globus, op. cit., pp. 190–191.