References
- B. Williams, ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. See also for instance Ashford, E. ‘Utilitarianism, Integrity and Partiality’ in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCVII.8, August 2000, pp.421–439.
- Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy and The Genealogy of Morals, trans. F. Golffing, New York and London: Anchor Books, 1956 and 1990.
- Søren Kierkegaard, Either/Or, abridged and translated by A. Hannay, London: Penguin Classics, Penguin Books, 1992, Part IIE (EO, II); Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling, trans. W. Lowrie, New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1954.
- See also for instance Nietzsche's Daybreak, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, §551.
- Such concepts as self-conception, integrity and self-alienation resurfaced in Bernard Williams, who used them to attack utilitarianism.
- Charles Taylor discusses this sort of view, for instance in ‘Self-interpreting Animals’, Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
- Antonio Damasio discusses emotion as an aspect of agency in Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Cambridge, Mass.: Picador, 1990.
- Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power, trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale, ed. W. Kaufmann, New York: Vintage 1968.
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human [HAH], trans. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1986, §300
- Colin Wilson discusses this view in The Outsider, London: Gollancz 1956.
- For both Nietzsche and Heidegger our view of the world depends on ‘interpretation’, and there is no common self in which a priori valid cognitive restraints on reality might reside. Interpretations are possible for Heidegger given our just being there in a practical, pretheoretical engagement with the world in everyday projects. How far GM, I implies this view, or a residual dualism, is a question for further discussion. See Campbell, D. M. A., ‘Nietzsche, Heidegger and Meaning’, The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Issue 26, 2003, pp.25–54.
- Nietzsche, Philosophy and Truth, ed. and trans. D. Breazeale, Atlantic Highways: Humanities Press International, 1979, p.37 and pp.50–52
- See for instance Schacht, R., Nietzsche, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1983, Ch. III, especially pp. 140–156; also Danto, A. C., Nietzsche As Philosopher, New York: MacMillan 1965, Ch. IV, especially sections VI and VII.
- The Birth of Tragedy, especially §§I-V and §§XXI-XXV
- See D. M. A. Campbell, ‘Nietzsche, Interpretation and Truth’ in Nietzsche and Antiquity, ed. Paul Bishop, Camden House 2004, pp.343–360.
- ‘A Critical Backward Glance’ published in the 1886 edition to The Birth of Tragedy
- P. Poellner, ‘Perspectival Truth’, in Nietzsche, eds. J. Richardson and B. Leiter, New York: Oxford University Press 2001, p.117
- See for instance Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, Vol. 1, eds. and trans.H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1992, p.571.
- Quoted in Kaufmann, W., Existentialism, New York: Meridian 1975, p.95
- Quoted in the Editor's Introduction to Fear and Trembling, trans. W. Lowrie, p.xxiv.
- A. Rudd, Kierkegaard and the Limits of the Ethical, New York: Oxford Clarendon Paperbacks 1993, pp.34, 65
- See D. M. A. Campbell, ‘Kierkegaard, Freedom and Self-interpretation’, in Kierkegaard and Freedom, ed. J. Giles, Basingstoke: Palgrave 2000, pp.43–57
- Kierkegaard, ‘That Individual’, in Kaufmann, op.cit. pp. 94–101. See also ‘The Individual and “The Public”’ in Kierkegaard, ‘The Present Age’, trans. A. Dru in A Kierkegaard Anthology, ed. R. Bretall, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946.
- Kierkegaard, Purity of Heart, trans. D. Steere, Glasgow: Collins, Fontana Books 1961, p.27.