71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion

Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting: A Response

Pages 89-97 | Published online: 21 Oct 2014

References

  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. by Colin Smith (London: Routledge, 1962), pp. vii–viii
  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, op. cit., p. ix
  • This paper is a response to Terjei Mandt Larsen's article “Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 2003, 45–55
  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, op. cit., pp. 197–198
  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Eye and Mind“, in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, ed. by Galen A. Johnson (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), p. 123
  • See Galen A. Johnson, “Phenomenology and Painting: Cézanne's Doubt“, in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting. Ed. by Galen A. Johnson, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), p. 13
  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Cézanne's Doubt“, in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, ed. by Galen A. Johnson (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), pp. 63–64
  • Ibid., p. 65
  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence“, in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting. Ed. by Galen A. Johnson, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), p.86
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Eye and Mind“, op. cit., p. 134
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence“, op. cit., p. p. 87
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Eye and Mind“, op. cit., p. 121
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence“, op. cit., p. 87
  • Ibid., p. 87
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Eye and Mind“, op. cit., p. 121
  • Merleau-Ponty, “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence“, op. cit., p. 87
  • Ibid., p. 91
  • Ibid., p. 91
  • Merleau-Ponty observes that “Classical painting cannot be defined by its representation of nature or by its reference to “our senses”, nor modern painting by its reference to the subjective. The perception of classical painters already depended upon their culture, and our culture can still give form to our perception of the visible”. Ibid., pp. 85–86
  • Larsen, “Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting“, op. cit., p. 53
  • Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, op. cit., p. 450
  • Ibid, pp. 150–151
  • Ibid, p. 455
  • Linda Singer, “Merleau-Ponty on the Concept of Style“, in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, ed by Galen A. Johnson, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), pp. 240–43
  • I owe this observation and the illustrative quote from the Phenomenology of Perception to James Gordon Place, “Merleau-Ponty and the Spirit of Painting”, Philosophy Today 17, (Winter 1973): 280–290
  • Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, op. cit., p. 327.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.