Ethical Attention and the Self in Iris Murdoch and Maurice Merleau-Ponty

References

• Antonaccio, Maria. A Philosophy to Live By: Engaging Iris Murdoch. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bommarito, Nicolas. “Modesty as a Virtue of Attention.” The Philosophical Review 122.1 (2013): 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David. “The Representational Character of Experience.” In The Future for Philosophy. Ed. Brian Leiter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 153–182.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Bridget. “Iris Murdoch and the Prospects for Critical Moral Perception.” In Iris Murdoch, Philosopher. Ed. Justin Broackes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 227–254.
   Google Scholar
• Colzato, Lorenza S., Ayca Ozturk, and Bernhard Hommel. “Meditate to Create: The Impact of Focused-Attention and Open-Monitoring Training on Convergent and Divergent Thinking.” Frontiers in Psychology 3 (2012): 116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, Diego. “A Phenomenology of Creative Attention.” Phänomenologische Forschungen 2 (2018): 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Gurwitsch, Aron. Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston: Nortwestern University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, Nora. “Reduce Ourselves to Zero? Sabina Lovibond, Iris Murdoch, and Feminism.” Hypatia 30 (2015): 743–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, William. The Principles of Psychology, Volume One. New York: Dover Publications, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lovibond, Sabina. Iris Murdoch, Gender and Philosophy. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–1952. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mole, Christopher. “Attention, Self and The Sovereignty of Good.” In Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment. Ed. Anne Rowe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 72–84.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Iris. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Iris. Existentialists and Mystics. Ed. Peter Conradi. Harmondswoth: Penguin, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nanay, Bence. “Attention and Perceptual Content.” Analysis 70 (2010): 263–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, Michael. “Orienting of Attention.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32.1 (1980): 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, Seana. “The Moral Neglect of Negligence.” Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Vol. 3. Ed. Peter Vallentyne, Steven Wall, and David Sobel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 197–228.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Susanna. “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification.” Noûs 46.2 (2012): 201–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vice, Samantha. “The Ethics of Self-Concern.” In Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment. Ed. Anne Rowe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, Bernhard. “Bodily Experience Between Selfhood and Otherness.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2004): 235–48.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, Bernhard. Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Watzl, Sebastian. “The Nature of Attention.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011): 842–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, Simone. Waiting for God. New York: Perennial Library, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Wayne. “Attention as Selection for Action.” In Attention: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Ed. Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies, and Wayne Wu. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 97–116.
   Google Scholar