The Genesis of Action in Husserl’s Studien zur Struktur des Bewusstseins

References

• Crowell, S. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• De Monticelli, R. “The Phenomenology of Rational Agency.” The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Agency. Ed. C. Erhard and T. Keiling. London: Routledge, 2020. 362–375.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. “A Merleau-Pontyian Critique of Husserl’s and Searle’s Representationalist Accounts of Action.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100.3 (2000): 287–302.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, J. “Deliberating, Choosing, and Acting.” The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Agency. ed. by C. Erhard and T. Keiling, 376–387, London: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Erhard, C. “Unifying Agency. Reconsidering Hans Reiner’s Phenomenology of Activity.” Husserl Studies 35 (2019): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarello, S. Husserl’s Ethics and Practical Intentionality, New York: Bloomsbury, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J.G. The Person and the Common Life. Studies in a Husserlian Social Ethics, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Heinämaa, S. “Two ways of understanding persons: A Husserlian distinction.” Phenomenology and Mind 15(2018): 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hua III.1. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Erster Halbband: Text der 1.–3. Auflage – Nachdruck. Ed. Karl Schuhmann, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hua IV. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Ed. Marly Biemel. The Hague: Nijhoff. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hua XIX. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden. Ed. Ursula Panzer, Halle: 1901; rev. ed. 1922. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hua XLIII.3. Studien zur Struktur des Bewusstseins, Teilband III. Wille und Handlung. Ed. U. Melle and T. Vongehr. Dordrecht: Springer, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hua XXVIII. Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre. 1908–1914. Ed. U. Melle. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Erfahrung und Urteil. Ed. L. Landgrebe, Prague: Academie Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmar, D. “Human Freedom – A Husserlian Perspective.” Dialogue and Universalism 26 (2016): 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Loidolt S. “Experience and Normativity: The Phenomenological Approach.” Phenomenology and Experience: New Perspectives, Ed. A. Cimino and C. Leijenhorst, 150–165. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz, C. “Action: Phenomenology of Wishing and Willing in Husserl and Heidegger.” Husserl Studies 22 (2006): 121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melle, U. “Husserl’s Phenomenology of Willing.” Phenomenology of Values and Valuing. Ed. J. G. Hartand and L. Embree, 169–192. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Melle, U. “Studien zur Struktur des Bewusstseins: Husserls Beitrag zu einer phänomenologischen Psychologie.” Feeling and Value, Willing and Action: Essays in the Context of a Phenomenological Psychology. Ed. M. Ubiali & M. Wehrle, 3–11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, K. “Husserl’s Phenomenology of Will in his Reflections on Ethics.” Alterity and Facticity. Ed. N. Depraz and D. Zahavi, 121–138. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, K. “Phenomenology of Willing in Pfänder and Husserl.” The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Agency. Ed. C. Erhard and T. Keiling. 15–28. London: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. “Defending the Transcendental Attitude: Husserl’s Concept of the Person and the Challenges of Naturalism.” Phenomenology and Mind 7 (2014): 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Peucker, H. “Hat Husserl eine konsistente Theorie des Willens? Das Willensbewusstsein in der statischen und der genetischen Phänomenologie.” Husserl Studies 31 (2015): 17–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinofner-Kreidl, S. “Motive, Gründe und Entscheidungen in Husserls intentionaler Handlungstheorie.” Die Aktualität Husserls, Ed. V. Mayer, C. Erhard, M. Scherini, U. Meixner, 232–277. Freiburg: Karl Alber. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Spahn, C. Phänomenologische Handlungstheorie. Edmund Husserls Untersuchungen zur Ethik. Würzburg: Könnigshausen & Neumann, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Spano, N.. “Volitional causality vs natural causality: reflections on their compatibility in Husserl’s phenomenology of action.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. Advance online publication. (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09724-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiti, A. “Husserl’s Account of Action: Naturalistic or Anti-Naturalistic? A Journey through the Studien zur Struktur des Bewusstseins.” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 17 (2019): 8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Staiti, A. Etica Naturalistica e Fenomenologia. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. “What Happens When Someone Acts?” Mind 101.403 (1992): 461–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. Self and Other. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar