Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia

References

• Andrews, Matt. 2013. The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antlöv, Hans. 2003. ‘Village Government and Rural Development in Indonesia: The New Democratic Framework’. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 39 (2): 193–214. doi: 10.1080/00074910302013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arze del Granado, Francisco Javier, David Coady, and Robert Gillingham. 2012. ‘The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies: A Review of Evidence for Developing Countries’. World Development 40 (11): 2234–48. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, Sarah, Craig McIntosh, and Berk Özler. 2013. ‘The Regressive Demands of Demand-Driven Development’. Journal of Public Economics 106: 27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, Pranab, and Dilip Mookherjee. 2005. ‘Decentralizing Antipoverty Program Delivery in Developing Countries’. Journal of Public Economics 89 (4): 675–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barma, Naazneen H., Elizabeth Huybens, and Lorena Viñuela (eds). 2014. Institutions Taking Root: Building State Capacity in Challenging Contexts. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, Patrick, Rachael Diprose, and Michael Woolcock. 2011. Contesting Development: Participatory Projects and Local Conflict Dynamics in Indonesia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, Derick W., and Anna Wetterberg. 2013. ‘Performance-Based Public Management Reforms: Experience and Emerging Lessons from Service Delivery Improvement in Indonesia’. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (3): 433–57. doi: 10.1177/0020852313491059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootaert, Christiaan. 1999. ‘Social Capital, Household Welfare, and Poverty in Indonesia’. Local Level Institutions Working Paper 6, World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• International Projects Group. 2011. ‘Review of PMD Training Centers for the Ministry of Home Affairs’. Unpublished report, International Projects Group, University of the Sunshine Coast.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Blane D. 2015. ‘Decentralising to Villages in Indonesia: Money (and Other) Mistakes’. Public Administration and Development 35 (5): 347–59. doi: 10.1002/pad.1741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Bravo, Monica. 2014. ‘The Role of Local Officials in New Democracies: Evidence from Indonesia’. American Economic Review 104 (4): 1244–87. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.4.1244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John F., Dirk Steenberger, Greg Acciaioli, Geoff Baker, Anton Lucas, Vivianti Rambe, and Carol Warren. 2014. ‘Dilemmas of Participation: The National Community Empowerment Program’. In Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia, edited by Hal Hill, 233–59. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Menko PMK and the World Bank. 2016. ‘Debottlenecking Diagnostic Survey, October 2015–January 2016’. Jakarta: PNPM Support Facility.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, Marcus. 2013. ‘The Moderating Presidency: Bureaucratic Reform, Policy-Making and Institutional Resistance in Indonesia’. Presentation at the Partnership for Governance Reform (Kemitraan), Jakarta, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• Novrizal, Mohammad, and Owen Podger. 2014. ‘Corruption Prevention in Village Finance Governance’. Paper presented at the University of Andalas and KPK Conference, Padang, 5–6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Olken, Benjamin A. 2007. ‘Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia’. Journal of Political Economy 115 (2): 200–249. doi: 10.1086/517935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PNPM Steering Committee. 2014. ‘Recommendations for Activities to be Completed during Period of Transition towards Implementation of Law No. 6/2014 Regarding Villages’. Presentation to the PNPM Steering Working Group Secretariat, Jakarta, 27 June. PSF (PNPM Support Facility). 2014. PNPM Governance Six-Monthly Update: February 2014. Jakarta: PSF.
   Google Scholar
• Syukri, Muhammad, Sulton Mawardi, and Akhmadi. 2013. A Qualitative Study on the Impact of the PNPM-Rural in East Java, West Sumatra, and Southeast Sulawesi. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• TNP2 K (National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction). 2015. Integrating Community-Driven Development Principles into Policy: From PNPM Mandiri to the Village Law. Jakarta: TNP2 K.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, John. 2008. Impact Evaluation of the Second Phase of the Kecamatan Development Program in Indonesia. Jakarta: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, John. 2012. PNPM Rural Impact Evaluation. Jakarta: PNPM Support Facility.
   Google Scholar
• Wetterberg, Anna, Jon R. Jellema, and Leni Dharmawan. 2014. The Local Level Institutions Study 3: Overview Report. Jakarta: Coordinating Ministry for People’s Welfare, TNP2 K, and PNPM Support Facility.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014. ‘Local Government’s Resource Mobilization to the Village: Challenges to Comply to the New Village Law Requirements’. Unpublished note, World Bank, Jakarta.
   Google Scholar