New business histories! Plurality in business history research methods

References

• Anteby, M., and V. Molnár. “Collective Memory Meets Organizational Identity: Remembering to Forget in a Firm's Rhetorical History.” Academy of Management Journal 55, no. 3 (2012): 515–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, S. The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., and H. Lune. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boldizzoni, Francesco. The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, Kyle, and C. Nyland. “Elton Mayo and the Deification of Human Relations.” Organization Studies 32, no. 3 (2011): 383–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D. A. and A. Bryman, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bucheli, Marcelo, and R. Daniel Wadhwani. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Burgelman, Richard A. “Bridging History and Reductionism: A Key Role for Longitudinal Qualitative Research.” Journal of International Business Studies 42, no. 5 (2011): 591–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” The Sociological Review 46, no. S1 (May 1998): 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa, eds. Market Devices. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Chris. “The Age of Strategy: Strategy, Organizations and Society.” Business History 55, no. 7 (2013): 1047–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press Harvard University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. “Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, no. 3 (1992): 79–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Peter, and Michael Rowlinson. “The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’.” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels, E. “Trying to Become a Different Type of Company: Dynamic Capabilities at Smith Corona.” Strategic Management Journal 32, no. 1 (2011): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, Abe, Higgins David, and van Driel Hugo. “Towards a New Business History?” Business History, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Stephanie. “The Silence of the Archives: Business History, Post-colonialism and Archival Ethnography.” Management & Organizational History 8, no. 2 (2013): 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Stephanie. “Solid Intentions: An Archival Ethnography of Corporate Architecture and Organizational Remembering.” Organization 21, no. 4 (2014): 514–542
   Google Scholar
• Eloranta, Jari, H. Valtonen, and Ojala Jari. “Methods, Topics, and Trends in Recent Business History Scholarship.” Association of Business Historians, ABH Newsletter 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, Lars, Matthias Kipping, and Behlül Üsdiken. “Public Science Systems, Higher Education and the Trajectory of Academic Disciplines: Business Studies in the United States and Europe.” In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production, edited by Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 325–353. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fear, Jeffrey. “Mining the Past: Historicizing Organizational Learning and Change.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theaory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 169–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, William M., Roy Suddaby, A. Minkus, E. Wiebe. “History as Social Memory Assets: The Example of Tim Hortons.” Management & Organizational History 6, no. 1 (2011): 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, Robert F. The Struggle for Control of the Modern Corporation: Organizational Change at General Motors, 1924–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Galambos, Louis. “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History.” Business History Review 44, no. 3 (1970): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos, Louis. “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis.” Business History Review 57, no. 4 (1983): 471–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos, Lou. “Is This a Decisive Moment for Business, Economic History, and the History of Capitalism?” Essays in Economic & Business History 32 (2014): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderblom, Oscar, Abe de Jong, and Joost Jonker. “The Formative Years of the Modern Corporation: The Dutch East India Company VOC, 1602–1623.” (No. ERS-2012-007-F&A). Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), June 2012. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/32952.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Per H. “Organizational Culture and Organizational Change: The Transformation of Savings Banks in Denmark 1965–1990.” Enterprise and Society 8, no. 4 (2007): 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Per H. “Business History: A Cultural and Narrative Approach.” Business History Review 86, no. 4 (2012): 693–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Per H., and R. Daniel Wadhwani. “Can Business History and Anthropology Learn from Each Other?” Journal of Business Anthropology 3, no. 1 (2014): 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., and Y. Douglas. “When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2001): 476–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassard, John S. “Rethinking the Hawthorne Studies: The Western Electric Research in its Social, Political and Historical Context.” Human Relations 65, no. 11 (2012): 1431–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, Louis. Debtor Nation: The History of America in Red Ink. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., M. Maoret, F. G. Massa, and S. Svejenova. “Rebels With a Cause: Formation, Contestation, and Expansion of the De Novo Category ‘Modern Architecture,’ 1870–1975.” Organization Science 23, no. 6 (2012): 1523–1545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Geoffrey. Renewing Unilever. Transformation and Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Khaire, M., and R. D. Wadhwani. “Changing Landscapes: The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category - Modern Indian Art.” Academy of Management Journal 53, no. 6 (2010): 1281–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieser, Alfred. “Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses - And How This Should Be Performed.” Organization Science 5, no. 4 (1994): 608–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, and Behlül Üsdiken. “History in Organization and Management Theory: More Than Meets the Eye.” The Academy of Management Annals 8, no. 1 (2014): 535–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, R. Daniel Wadhwani, and Marcelo Bucheli. “Analyzing and Interpreting Historical Sources: A Basic Methodology.” In Organizations in Time, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 305–330. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, and Juha Antti-Lamberg. “Historical Methods.” In The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies, edited by Ann Langley and Haridimos Tsoukas. London: Sage, 2015  forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux, Naomi R., D. M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108, no. 2 (2003) 404–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, Ann. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24, no. 4 (1999): 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipartito, Kenneth. “Culture and the Practice of Business History.” Business and Economic History 24 (1995): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lipartito, Kenneth. “Historical Sources and Data.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 284–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, S., and E. Aldrich Howard. “History and Evolutionary Theory.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, and Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 124–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, Mairi, Charles Harvey, and Robert Chia. “Sensemaking, Storytelling and the Legitimization of Elite Business Careers.” Human Relations 65, no. 1 (2012): 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay, Alan. “‘Dead Selves’: The Birth of the Modern Career.” Organization 9, no. 4 (2002): 595–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay, Alan. “Following Foucault into the Archives: Clerks, Careers and Cartoons.” Management & Organizational History 8, no. 2 (2013): 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Mihm, S. A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mordhorst, Mads. “From Counterfactual History to Counter-narrative History.” Management & Organizational History 3, no. 1 (2008): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, Ellen S. “The Politics of Management Thought: A Case Study of the Harvard Business School and The Human Relations School.” Academy of Management Review 24, no. 1–2 (1999): 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, J. C. When Wall Street Met Main Street. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew, and R. Holt. “Entrepreneurship and the Organization of Being: The Case of the Shaws.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 25, no. 1 (2013): 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew, and R. Holt. “The Presence of Entrepreneurial Opportunity.” Business History 55, no. 3 (2013): 9–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff, D. M. G. “How to Do Things with Time.” Enterprise and Society 14 (2013): 435–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. Time and Narrative. Volume I. trans. K. McLaughlin and D. Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, Michael, and John Hassard. “History and the Cultural Turn in Organization Studies.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 147–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, Michael, John Hassard, and Stephanie Decker. “Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Review 39, no. 3 (2014): 250–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf, Stefan. “What is an Archive - and Where is it? Why Business Historians Need a Constructive Theory of the Archive.” Business Archives: Sources and History 105 (2012): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, William H. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, Roy, William M. Foster, and Albert J. Mills. “Historical Institutionalism.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 100–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, Roy, William M. Foster, and C. Q. Trank. “Rhetorical History as a Source of Competitive Advantage.” Advances in Strategic Management 27 (2010): 147–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripsas, Mary, and G. Gavetti. “Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging.” Strategic Management Journal 21, no. 10–11 (2000): 1147–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, Behlül, and Matthias Kipping. “History and Organization Studies: A Long-term View.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, and Methods, edited by Marcelo Bucheli and Dan Wadhwani, 33–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. Daniel, and Marcelo Bucheli. “The Future of the Past in Management and Organization Studies.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 3–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Sidney G. “An Evolutionary Program for Business History?” Enterprise & Society 14, no. 3 (2013): 498–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, JoAnne. “Understanding Historical Methods in Organization Studies.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M. Bucheli and R. D. Wadhwani, 265–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zald, Mayer N. “Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Toward a Reconceptualization of the Foundations of the Field.” Organization Science 4, no. 4 (1993): 513–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar