Transition to greener pulp: regulation, industry responses and path dependency

References

• AnnergrenG., E.Jansson, H.Makkonen, H.Norrström, R. Kartläggning av svenska och finska blekerier, interim Report No. 10 within the project “Klorid i återvinningssystem (1974–76).” Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries, 1974 Rasimus.
   Google Scholar
• ArthurB. W. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Historical Lock-In by Historical Events.” Economic Journal99, no. 394 (1989): 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergquistA.-K., K-Söderholm, H.Kinneryd, M.Lindmark and P.Söderholm. “Command-and-Control Revisited. Environmental Compliance and Technological Change in Swedish Industry 1970–1990.” Ecological Economics85 (2013): 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergquistA.-K., and K.Söderholm. “Green Innovation Systems in Swedish Industry 1960–1989.” Business History Review85, no. 4 (2011): 677–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BingelE., C.Sjöberg, and C.Sjöquist. Från defensiv till proaktiv. Drivkrafterna bakom hållbar tillväxt, Report. Stockholm: Svenskt näringsliv, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• DavidP. A. “Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History.” In Economic History and the Modern Economist, edited by W.Parker, 30–49. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• DosiG. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.” Research Policy11, no. 3 (1982): 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErikssonL.STFIs öden och äventyr 1942–2010: fakta-minnen-reflexioner. Stockholm: Spearhead production AB, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• FahlströmJ.-M. “Några drag ur den svenska pappers- och cellulosaindustriens ekonomiska utveckling under 1900-talet.” In Cellulosa och Papper, 69–80. Svenska Pappers- och Cellulosaingeniörsföreningen, Stockholm, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• FloegelM. “The Medium is the Message: Time Magazine and TCF Paper.” Pulp & Paper68, no. 8 (1994): 106.
   Google Scholar
• FreemanC. “The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics19 (1995): 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiljamM., and S.Holmerg. Rött blått grönt. Stockholm: Bonniers, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• GunninghamN. “Environment Law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures.” Journal of Environmental Law21, no. 2 (2009): 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GunninghamN., R. A.Kagan, and D.Thorthon. Different Shades of Green. Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• HallP. A., and D.Soskice. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• HardellL. “Säldöden liknar aids: Dioxiner är trolig orsak till säldöden och sjukdomsförloppet påminner om aids.” Dagens Nyheter, Stockholm, 2 August, (1988): 5.
   Google Scholar
• HarrisonA. “Stora's Skoghall Mill Meets Market Demand with Ozone-based TCF Process.” Pulp & Paper96 (1993): 77.
   Google Scholar
• HarrisonK. “Ideas and Environmental Standard Setting: A Comparative Study of Regulation of P&P Industry.” Governance15, no. 1 (2002): 65–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HellgrenB., and L.Melin. “Business Systems, Industrial Wisdom and Corporate Strategies.” In European Business Systems. Firms and Markets in their National Context, 180–197. edited by R.Whitley. London: SAGE Publications, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• HåkansonH., and A.Waluszewski. “Path Dependency: Restricting or Facilitating Technological Development?” Journal of Business Research55, no. 7 (2002): 561–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interview with Hans Norrström. Stockholm, 8 June, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• JerkemanP.Bokslut. Några lönsamma forskningsresultat. Stockholm: Skogsindustrins Forskningsstiftelse, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• JonesG., and C.Lubinski. “Making Green Giants: Environment Sustainability in the German Chemical Industry, 1950s–1980s.” Business History56, no. 4 (2014): 623–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JärvinenJ., J.Ojala, A.Melander, and J. A.Lamberg. “The Evolution of Pulp and Paper Industries in Finland, Sweden, and Norway 1800–2005.” In The Evolution of Global Paper Industry 1800–2050. A Comparative Analysis, edited by J.-A.Lamberg, J.Ojala, M.Peltoniemi, and T.Särkkä, 19–48. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• KempR., and L.Soete. “Inside the Green Box: On the Economics of Technological Change the Environment.” In New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change, edited by C.Freeman and L.Soete, 245–257. London: Printer.
   Google Scholar
• KinnerydH.Så Länge Det är Tekniskt Möjligt, Ekonomiskt Rimligt och Miljömässigt Motiverat: en studie av det tidiga svenska miljöskyddssystemet med fokus på teknisk utveckling inom svensk pappers och massaindustri. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden: Luleå University Research Report Series, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• KonradJ.Ecologically Sound Production? How the Interaction of the World Market Conditions, Corporate Capability and Environmental Policy Determines Success and Failure of Environmental Innovations, Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik, Berlin. FFU-report 00-05, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• LambergJ.-A., J.Ojala, M.Peltoniemi, and T.Särkkä. The Evolution of Global Paper Industry 1800–2050. A Comparative Analysis. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• LiebowitzS. J., and S. E.Margolis. “Path Dependence, Lock-in and History.” Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation11, no. 4 (1995): 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• LindmarkM., and A.-K.Bergquist. “Expansion for Pollution Reduction? Environmental Adaptation of a Swedish and a Canadian Metal Smelter 1960–2005.” Business History50, no. 1 (2008): 530–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LundqvistL. J.The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• LundqvistL. J.Miljövårdsförvaltning och politisk struktur. Uppsala: Verdandi; Stockholm: Prisma, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• MagnussonL.Sveriges ekonomiska historia. Stockholm: Norstedts, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• MelanderA. “Industry-wide Belief Structures and Strategic Behaviour: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry 1945–1980.” Scandinavian Economic History Review53, no. 1 (2005): 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• MelanderA. “Strategy Formation in the Swedish Forest Industry. Comparing SCA and Modo.” In The Evolution of Competitive Strategies in Global Forestry Industries: Comparative Perspectives, edited by J.-A.Lamberg, J.Näsi, J.Ojala, and P.Sajasalo. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• MelanderA.Industrial Wisdom and Strategic Change: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry 1945–1990, Dissertation. Jönköping International Business School, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• MiklerJ.Greening the Car Industry. Varieties of Capitalism and Climate Change. (141–166). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-BohmV., and M.Rossi. “The Power of Incrementalism: Environmental Regulation and Technological Change in P&P Bleaching in the US.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management10, no. 2 (1998): 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatrickK. L. “TCF Driven by Sound of Different Drummer.” Pulp & Paper67, no. 1 (1993): 9.
   Google Scholar
• PetersonC. “The Development Paths of Two Nordic Forest Nations, 1950–1992.” Scandinavian Economic History Review49, no. 1 (2001): 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• PetersonC.Finsk ingenjörskonst och svenskt imperiebyggande: En jämförande studie av finsk och svensk skogsindustri. Stockholm: SNS, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• PoppD., T.Hafner, and N.Johnstone. “Environmental Policy vs. Public Pressure: Innovation and Diffusion of Alternative Bleaching Technologies in the Pulp Industry.” Research Policy40, no. 9 (2011): 1253–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowellM. R.Control of Dioxins (and Other Organochlorines) From the P&P Industry Under the Clean Water Act and Lead in Soil at Superfund Mining Sites: Two Case Studies in the EPA's Use of Science, Discussion Paper 97–08. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• ReinstallerA. “Policy Entrepreneurship in the Co-evolution of Institutions, Preferences and Technology. Comparing the Diffusion of Totally Chlorine Free Pulp Bleaching Technologies in the US and Sweden.” Research Policy34 (2005): 1366–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinstallerA. “The Technological Transition to Chlorine Free Pulp Bleaching Technologies: Lessons for Transition Policies.” Journal of Cleaner Production16, no. 4 (2008): 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RennelJ.Långsiktigt värdeskapande och värdeförstöring – framgångsrika och misslyckade investeringar i skogsindustrin. Stockholm: Spearhead production, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• RoddenG. “TCF is here to stay at Södra”. Pulp and Paper International Magazine Okt. 1 (2002) http://www.risiinfo.com/magazines/October/2002/PPI/pulp-paper/magazine/international/october/2002/TCF-is-here-to.html.
   Google Scholar
• RosenC. M., and C. C.Sellers. “The Nature of the Firm: Towards an Ecocultural History of Business.” Business History Review73 (1999): 577–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenbergN.Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• RycroftR. W., and D. E.Kash. “Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management14, no. 1 (2002): 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogsstatistisk Årsbok 1986 [Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 1986]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Skogsstatistisk Årsbok 1989 [Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 1989]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• SmithA., and A.Rajotte. “When Markets Meet Sociopolitics: The Introduction of Chlorine-free Pulp Bleaching in the Swedish P&P Industry.” In Technology and Markets. Demand, Users and Innovation, edited by R.Combs, K.Green, A.Richards, and V.Walsh. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• SmithM.The US Paper Industry and Sustainable Production. An Argument for Reconstruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• SöderholmK., and A.-K.Bergquist. “Firm-collaboration and Environmental Adaptation: The Case of the Swedish P&P Industry 1900–1990.” Scandinavian Economic History Review60 (2012): 183–211.
   Google Scholar
• SöderholmK., and A.-K.Bergquist. “Growing Green and Competitive – A Case Study of a Swedish Pulp Mill.” Sustainability5 (2013): 1789–1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SörlinS.En ny institutssektor. En analys av industriforskningsinstitutens villkor och framtid ur ett närings- och innovationspolitiskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• SSVL (Swedish Forest Industries' Water and Air Pollution Research Foundation). Interim Report No. 10 within the project “Klorid i återvinningssystem (1974–76).” Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• SSVL (Swedish Forest Industries' Water and Air Pollution Research Foundation). Miljövänlig tillverkning av blekt massa. Final report. Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• SSVL (Swedish Forest Industries' Water and Air Pollution Research Foundation). Miljö 90. Final report. Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• SSVL (Swedish Forest Industries' Water and Air Pollution Research Foundation). Klorid i återvinningssystem. Final report. Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• SwansonS. E.Dioxins in the Bleach Plant. A Study of Occurrence and Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans and Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins in the Chlorine Bleaching of Wood Pulp. Umeå University: Institute of Environmental Chemistry, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Dioxin i krabbor från svenska västkusten, November 24 1986 (unpublished report). Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• ToivanenH. “Waves of Technological Innovation: The Evolution of the US Pulp and Paper Industry, 1860–2000.” In The Evolution of Global Paper Industry 1800–2050. A Comparative Analysis, edited by J.-A.Lamberg, J.Ojala, M.Peltoniemi, and T.Särkkä, 49–80. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• UekötterF. “Divergent Responses to Identical Problems: Businessman and the Smoke Nuisance in Germany and the United States, 1880–1971.” Business History Review73 (1999): 641–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UekötterF.The Age of Smoke: Environmental Policy in Germany and the United States, 1880–1970. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• WallaceD.Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation. Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. London: Earthscan, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• WaluszewskiA., and H.Håkansson. “Das Plagiat.” In Artefakter: industrin, vetenskapen och de tekniska nätverken, edited by S.Widmalm, 219–244. Möklinta: Gidlunds förlag, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• YarimeM. “Promoting Green Innovation or Prolonging the Existing Technology. Regulation and Technological Change in the Chlor-Alkali Industry in Japan and Europe.” Journal of Industrial Ecology11, no. 4 (2007): 117–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoungJ. “Louisiana-Pacific's Samoa Mill Establishing TCF Pulp Production.” Pulp & Paper67, no. 8 (1993): 61–63.
   Google Scholar