Path-dependent product development and Fiat's takeover of Lancia in 1969: meta-routines for design selection between synergies and brand autonomy

References

• Abernathy, W. J., and J. M. Utterbeck. “Patterns of Industrial Innovation.” Technology Review 80, no. 7 (1978): 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aglietta, M. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. London: Verso Classics, 2000 [1979].
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, J. M., and A. Carroll. “Medical Malpractice Reform and Insurer Claims Defense: Unintended Effects?” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 32, no. 5 (2007): 843–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatori, F. “Per una storia economica della Lancia.” In La carte Scoperte, edited by Archivio Storico Fiat, Franco Angeli, Torino. 77–92, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Amatori, F. Impresa e mercato: Lanica 1906–1969. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Amatori, F. “Gli uomini del Professore. Strategie, organizzazione e management alla Fiat fra anni Venti e anni Sessanta.” In Grande Impresa e sviluppo Italiano. Studi per i cento anni della Fiat, edited by C. Annibaldi and G. Berta, 257–342. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Archivio Storico Fiat. Fiat: Le Fasi Della Cresicta. Torino: Paravia, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C., “Organizational routines.” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13, pp. 643–77, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, K. The Future of the World Motor Industry. London: Kogan Page, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Bigazzi, D. “Management and Strategies in the Italian Car Industry, 1906–1945: Fiat and Alfa Romeo.” In The Automobile Industry and ots Workers. Betweeen Fordism and Flexibility, edited by S. Tolliday and J. Zeitlin, 76–96. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., and M. Freyssenet. The Productive Models: The Conditions for Profitability. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Castronovo, V. Giovanni Agnelli. La Fiat dal 1899 al 1945, Torino, Einaudi, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Castronovo, V. Fiat 1899–1999: cento anni di storia italiana. Milano, Rizzoli, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. “Superfactuals, Structural Repertoires and Productive Units. Explaining the Evolution of the British Auto Industry.” Competition and Change 10, no. 4 (2006): 357–377.
   Google Scholar
• Driel, H., and W. Dolfsma. “Path Dependence, Initial Conditions, and Routines in Organizations: The Toyota Production System Re-examined.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 22, no. 1 (2009): 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foschi, A. “La parabola storica della Lancia attravesrso la lettura di bilanci.” In La carte Scoperte, edited by Archivio Storico Fiat, 187–238.
   Google Scholar
• Freyssenet, M. “Wrong Forecasts and Unexpected Changes: The World the Changed the Machine.” In The Second Automobile Revolution. Trajectories of the World Car Makers in the 21st Century, edited by M. Freyssenet, 7–37. Paris: Palgrave, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R. K., and A. Karnøe. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47, no. 4 (2010): 760–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacosa, D. Progetti alla Fiat prima del computer. Milano: Automobilia, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Gennaro, P., and G. Scifo. Parabole di imprenditori ed imprese in cinquant'anni di sviluppo italiano. Milano, Franco Angeli, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Greggio, R. Fiat una crise automobile. Croissance externe et management de marque. Paris: Les Edision de l'Officine, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., and K. Clark. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, no. 35 (1990): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., and C. Shapiro. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.” American Economic Review, no. 75 (1985): 424–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (2000): 507–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maielli, G. “Spot-welding Technology and the Development of Robotics at Fiat, 1972–1987.A Case of Production Management Discontinuity?” Business History 47, no. 1 (2005): 102–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maielli, G. “The Machine That Never Changed: Intangible Specialisation and Output-mix Optimisation at Fiat, 1960s–1990s.” Competition and Change 9, no. 3 (2005): 249–276.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., and M. Holmen. Flexibility and Stability in the Innovating Economy. Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, P., and P. Wells. “The All-steel Body as a Cornerstone to the Foundation of the Mass Production Car Industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16, no. 2 (2007): 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piore, M., and C. F. Sabel. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. Work and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, W. “Exploring Stability in Path Dependence: Lock-in as a Process.” Conference Paper, Second International Conference on Path Dependence, Berlin, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, N., S. Chambers, and R. Johnston. Operations Management. London: Prentice Hall, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., G. Schreyögg, and J. Koch. “Organizational Path-Dependence: Opening the Black Box.” Academy of Management Review 34, no. 4 (2009): 689–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., A. Windeler, C. Schbert, and G. Möllering. “Organizing R&D Consortia for Path Creation and Extension: The Case of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies.” Organization Studies 33, no. 7 (2012): 907–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergne, J.-P., and R. Durand. “The Missing Link Between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications.” Journal of Management Studies 47, no. 4 (2010): 737–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpato, G. Il caso Fiat. Una strategia di riorganizzazione e di rilancio. Torino, ISEDI, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Weernink, W. La Lancia. Croydon, Motor Racing Publications, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Whipp, R., and P. Clark. Innovation and the Auto Industry: Product, Process and Work Organization. London: Pinter, 1985.
   Google Scholar