Implementing and operating the Portsmouth Block Mill, 1803–1812

References

• Anonymous. (1808). An account of blocks and shells stored in the block machinery (Manuscript. Accession ADM 106/1885). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1809a). Untitled and unsigned one-page manuscript (Accession ADM 106/3519). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1809b). Wood mills stock in hand reported (Manuscript. Accession ADM 106/3519). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1809c). Portsmouth off. Blockmaker’s wares received from the Wood mills value etc (Manuscript. Accession ADM 106/3519). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1824). Block Machinery. London: Encyclopedia Britannica.
   Google Scholar
• Armytage, W. H. G. (1961). A social history of engineering. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Babbage, C. (1832). On the economy of machinery and manufactures. London: Charles Knight.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, S. (1803–18). Admiralty accounts and letters (Accession ADM 1/3519). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, S. (1803–12). Admiralty letters (Accession ADM 1/3527). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. (1979). Technology and toil in nineteenth century Britain. London: CSE Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. (1980). The machinery question and the making of political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/85.5.1195-a
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. (1994). The age of manufactures, 1700-1820: Industry, innovation, and work in Britain (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M., & Hudson, P. (1992). Rehabilitating the industrial revolution. The Economic History Review, 45(1), 24–50. doi: 10.2307/2598327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowbelski, M. (1977). The royal small arms factory (Occasional Papers, New Series No. 35). Enfield: Edmonton Hundred Historical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, D. (1811). Edinburgh encyclopaedia (Vol. 3, pp. 582–588). Edinburgh: William Blackwood.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, J. (1812). Wood mills labour reports (Accession ADM 42/1469). London: National Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Coad, J. (2005). The Portsmouth Block Mills. Swindon: English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. (2002). Efficiency in dockyard administration 1660-1800: A reassessment. In N. Tracy (Ed.), Age of sail (pp. 116–132). London: Conway Maritime Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. (2005a). Implications for management & labour. Portsmouth Dockyard in the Age of Nelson—A Conference & Tour, Portsmouth, England, 1 May, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. (2005b). Innovative installations, Portsmouth Dockyard 1805. In H. Mike (Ed.), Trafalgar 200 (pp. 32–33). West Moseley: E P Homan/Crown/Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. (2006). The Wood mills: New labour practices for new machines? In R. Riley (Ed.), Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, Portsmouth Dockyard in the age of Nelson (Vol. 1, pp. 59–84). Naval Dockyards Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. C. (1981). The production line at Portsmouth Block Mill. Industrial Archaeology Review, 6(1), 28–44. doi: 10.1179/iar.1981.6.1.28
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. C. (1984). The Portsmouth system of manufacture. Technology and Culture, 25, 182–225. doi: 10.2307/3104712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottlesloe, C. L. (1933–4). Notes on the history of the Royal Small Arms Factory, Enfield Lock. Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research, 12(48), 197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S., Bridgman T., Hassard J., & Rowlinson M. (2017). A New History of Management. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Defoe, D. (1697). An essay upon projects. London: Cassell & Co., reprinted 1887.
   Google Scholar
• Favotto, A., & Wilson, J. M. (2017). From seedlings to ships: Supply chain management in the Venice Arsenale, 1320-1800. Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (1994). Accounting and the Benthams - or accounting’s potentialities. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 4(3), 431–460. doi: 10.1080/09585209400000057
   Google Scholar
• Garel, G. (2013). A history of project management models: From pre-models to the standard models. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. K. (1965). The Portsmouth blockmaking machinery. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzburg, C., Tedeschi, J., & Tedeschi, A. C. (1993). Microhistory: Two or three things that I know about it. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 10–35. doi: 10.1086/448699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich, S. (1803–1820). Simon Goodrich collection: Papers, 1707-1847; Journals and Memoranda. Swindon: Science Museum Library.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (2013). The Victorian London sanitation project and the sanitation of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 341(5), 682–691. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Hume, L. J. (1970). The development of industrial accounting: The Benthams’ contribution. Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 21–33. doi: 10.2307/2674710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, F. R., & Chase, R. B. (2013). Operations and supply chain management. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak-Holland, M., & Proctor, C. (2014). Florence Duomo project (1420-1436) Learning best project management practice from history. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 242–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, F. C. (1934, reprinted 1992). Venetian Ships and Shipbuilders. Baltimore, Md., USA: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, F. C. (1973). Venice, a maritime republic. Baltimore, Md., USA: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, I. (2015, May 29). The importance of networking during the industrialisation of Britain 1750 to 1850. Exploring the Project Based Economy: Commerce, Enterprise and Industry 1650–1900 Conference, Archives and Artefacts Study Network/British Archives Council, Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust, Coalbrookdale, England.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. H. (1996). The development of the Royal Small Arms Factory (Enfield Lock) and its influence upon mass production technology and product design c1820-c1880 (Unpublished PhD thesis). Middlesex University, London. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6706/
   Google Scholar
• Lock, D. (2013). Project management (10th ed.). London: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. (1822). Marshall’s practical Marine Gunnery. Norfolk, VA: C. Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, N., & Bresnen, M. (2013). Tunnel vision? Brunel’s Thames tunnel and project narratives. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 692–704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendrick, N. (1960). Josiah Wedgwood: An eighteenth-century entrepreneur in salesmanship and marketing techniques. The Economic History Review, 12(3), 408–433. doi: 10.2307/2590885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. G., Mills, A. J., & Weatherbee, T. G. (2015). The Routledge companion to management and organizational history. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, R. (1981). Samuel Bentham and the management of the Royal Dockyards. Historical Research, 54(130), 226–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2281.1981.tb01229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriss, R. (1983). The Royal Dockyards during the revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. Leicester: Leicester University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/89.5.1328-a
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, R. (2008). Benthamism in the Royal Dockyards and British public culture. In R. Riley (Ed.), Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, Portsmouth Dockyard in the age of Nelson (Vol. 4, pp. 21–26). Naval Dockyards Society.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, R. (2011). The foundations of British Maritime ascendancy: Resources, logistics and the state, 1755–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, C. P. (1835). Blocks, the British cyclopaedia of the arts and sciences (Vol. 1, p. 217). London: Orr and Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Pheng, L. S. (2007). Managing building projects in ancient China: A comparison with modern-day project management principles and practices. Journal of Management History, 13(2), 192–210.
   Google Scholar
• Pinedo, M. L. (2009). Planning and scheduling in manufacturing and services. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, S. (1965). The genesis of modern management: A study of the industrial revolution in Great Britain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raff, D. (1996). Productivity Growth at Ford in the Coming of Mass Production: A Preliminary Analysis. Business and Economic History, 25(1), 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, A. (1812). Manufacture of ships’ blocks. In A. Rees (Ed.), Cyclopaedia (Vol. 22). London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown. http://archive.org/details/cyclopaediaorun22rees with illustration plates at: http://archive.org/details/cyclopaediaoru02rees
   Google Scholar
• Riley, R. (2006). Marc Brunel’s Pulley block-making machinery: Operation and assessment. In R. Riley (Ed.), Transactions of the Naval Dockyards Society, Portsmouth Dockyard in the age of Nelson (Vol. 1, pp. 85–92). Naval Dockyards Society.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, E. (1930). An early experiment in industrial organization. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1969). The American system of manufactures. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson, B. (1980). Giants of small heath: History of BSA. London: GT Foulis & Co., Reprint Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Shendov, Y. (2002). Manufacturing rationality: The engineering foundations of the managerial revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprint, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., & Lenfle, S. (2013). Making project history: Revisiting the past, creating the future. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 653–662. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, D. (1794). The elements and practice of rigging, seamanship, and naval tactics, Vol. 1: The art of making masts, yards, gaffs, booms, blocks, and oars, and Vol. 2: Tables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. reprint 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, B. (2013). Britain’s industrial revolution: The making of a manufacturing people. London: Carnegie Publishinbg, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ure, A. (1835). Philosophy of manufactures. London: Charles Knight.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin, F. S. (1999). The application of emerging new technologies by Portsmouth Naval Dockyard, 1790-1815 (Unpublished PhD thesis). Open University, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin, F. S. (2006). The contribution of Portsmouth Dockyard to the success of the Royal Navy in the Napoleonic Wars. Transactions of the Royal Dockyards Society 1, 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (1975). Government Dock-yard workers in Portsmouth 1793-1813 (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Warwick, Coventry.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M. (2014). Henry Ford vs assembly line balancing. International Journal of Production Research , 52(3), 757–765. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.836616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M. (2015a). Management in the Portsmouth Block Mill, 1803-1812. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 10033. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2015.122
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M. (2015b). Performance-based pay: Alternative interpretations of the Portsmouth Block Mills’ savings. Journal of Management History, 22(3), 269–297. doi: 10.1108/JMH-04-2016-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., & McKinlay, A. (2010). Rethinking the assembly line: Organization, performance and productivity in Ford Motor Company, c. 1908-1927. Business History, 52(5), 760–778. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2010.499425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. R. (2003). The business of civil war: Military enterprise, the state, and political economy in the United States, 1850-1880. Enterprise & Society, 4(4), 599–605. doi: 10.1093/es/khg047
   Google Scholar
• Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (2009). The evolution of management thought (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wysocki, R. K. (2013). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar