Rule Convergence in Language Contact Situations: The Case of Sorbian and German

Reference

• Besch, Werner et al., eds. (1983), Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Henrik (1985), “Divergence and Convergence in Linguistic Evolution,” in J. Fisiak, ed., Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (Amsterdam: John Benjamins/Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz Univ. Press), pp. 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Boretzky, Norbert (1973), “Sprachkontakte,” in W.A. Koch, ed., Perspektiven der Linguistik, Vol. 1 (Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner), pp. 134-158.
   Google Scholar
• Bronisch, Gotthelf (1862), “Grundzüge der deutschen Mundart, welche inmitten der sorbischen Bevölkerung und Sprache in der Niederlausitz und den nördlichen Teilen der Oberlausitz gesprochen wird,” Niederlausitzisches Magazin 39:108-95.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Greville G. (1987), “The Morphology/Syntax Interface: Evidence from Possessive Adjectives in Slavonic,” Language 63.2:299-345.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, Ernst (1965), Studien zur Frühgeschichte slawischer Mundarten zwischen Saale und Neiße, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, Ernst (1969), “Zur historischen Phonologie des Westslawischen,” in W. Krauss et al., eds., Slawisch-deutsche Wechselbeziehungen in Sprache, Literatur und Kultur (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag), pp. 47-52.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, Ernst (1974), “Slawisch-deutscher Sprachkontakt auf phonetischer Ebene,” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 19:719-24.
   Google Scholar
• Faßke, Helmut (1981), Grammatik der obersorbischen Sprache der Gegenwart, Bautzen:Domowina.
   Google Scholar
• Faßke, Helmut (1996), Sorbischer Sprachatlas, vol. 15. Syntax, Bautzen: Domowina.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, Hans Henrich (1986), Principles of Historical Linguistics, Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, Hans Henrich and Brian D. Joseph (1996), Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman [1938] (1949), “Sur la théorie des affinités phonologiques des langues,” Actes du quatrième Congrès international de linguistes (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1938). In N.S. Troubetzkoy, Principes de phonologie, supplement (Paris: Klincksieck), pp. 361-365.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Walter (1973), Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William (1994), Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors, Oxford, UK/Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lass, Roger (1980), On Explaining Language Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkova, O.V. (1981), “O principe delenija reducirovannyx glasnyx na sil’nye i slabye v pozdnem praslavjanskom i drevnix slavjanskix jazykax,” Voprosy jazykoznanija 30, 1:98-l11.
   Google Scholar
• Michalk, Siegfried (1969), “Über den Einfluß des Sorbischen auf das Neulausitzische,” in W. Krauss et al., eds., Slawisch-deutsche Wechselbeziehungen in Sprache, Literatur und Kultur (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag), pp. 126-135.
   Google Scholar
• Rüžička, Rudolf (1997), “Puzzling Nominal Phrases in Upper Sorbian and Slovak,” Lĕtopis 44,1:223-231.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Michael L. (1987), “The Status of the Functional Approach,” in W. Koopman et al., eds., Explanation and Linguistic Change (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 239-250.
   Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt, Gunter (1983), “Markedness Theory and the Syntax of Definiteness in Sorbian and German,” Canadian Slavonic Papers 25.1:147-162 (Canadian Contributions to the IX International Congress of Slavists, Kiev 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt, Gunter (1993), “Dialectal Variation in Sorbian Reflexes of the Common Slavic jers,” in Mushira Eid and Gregory Iverson, eds., Principles and Prediction: The Analysis of Natural Language (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 367-376.
   Google Scholar
• Šewc-Schuster, Hinc (1976), Gramatika hornjoserbskeje rĕče. Part II: Syntaksa, Budyšin: Domowina.
   Google Scholar
• Shevelov, George Y. (1964), A Prehistory of Slavic: The Historical Phonology of Common Slavic, Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake, Alan (1988), “The Fall of the Jers in West Slavic (Kashubian and Upper Sorbian),” Die Welt der Slaven 33[12],2:225-47.
   Google Scholar
• Weinreich, Uriel (1964), Languages in Contact, The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Weinreich, Uriel;, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog (1968), “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change,” in W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel, eds., Directions for Historical Linguistics (Austin: University of Texas Press), pp. 95-188.
   Google Scholar
• Zwróćene dny. Spĕšne zapiski serbskich awtorow (1991), Budyšin: Domowina.
   Google Scholar
• Žirmunskij, Viktor M. (=Schirmunski) (1962), Deutsche Mundartkunde, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar