Method and Theory in Deciding Identity of Skeletonized Human Remains

REFERENCES

• Abbott, J., “Psychopathic Checklist: Coda,” Prison Journal, Simon Fraser University, Vol. 6, 1987, p. 69.
   Google Scholar
• Hülse, J., “Pentagon admits MIA's I.D. wrong,” Rocky Mountain News, Denver, June 28, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Pate, J.L., “Missing in Action: Skeletons in Uncle Sam's Closet,” Soldier of Fortune, July, 1986, pp. 32–37, 101.
   Google Scholar
• Getlin, J., “Hearts and Bones,” Los Angeles Times Magazine, Oct. 12, 1986, pp. 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, G.W., “Minutes of the AAFS Physical Anthropology Section Business Meeting, New Orleans, Feb. 12, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G.L. and Ware, J., Mengle, Dell, New York, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lorton, L. and Langley, W.H. “Decision-Making Concepts in Postmortem Identification,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 31, 1986, pp. 190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, E. and Elliot, O., “Race Identification from cranial measurements,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 7, 1962, pp. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Rhine, S., “Illustrations of Racial Differences in the Skull,” Personal Communication, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, G., “Age Determination from Teeth,” Odontologisk Revy, Vol. 22 Supp. 21, 1971, pp. 1–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitken, C.G.G., “Statistics and Forensic Science-A Fruitful Partnership,” Journal of the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 23, 1983, pp. 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, G., Introduction to Alphonse Bertillon's Instructions for Taking Descriptions for the Identification of Criminals and Others, AMS Press, New York, 1889.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, H.T.F., Alphonse Bertillon. Father of Scientific Detection. Greenwood Press, New York, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwald, J., Century of the Detective, Harcourt Brace and World, New York, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Preface to Alphonse Bertillon's Instructions for Taking Descriptions for the Identification of Criminals and Others. AMS Press, New York, 1889.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, F., Cause of Death. A History of Forensic Science, Orbis, London, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• De Rechter, G., “Affaire de Beernem. Identification du Marteau ayant servi d'Instrument du Crime,” Revue de Droit Penai et de Criminologie et Archives Internationales de Medecine Legale. (Belgium Ministry of Justice), 1929, pp. 1121–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, F., “Milestones in Forensic Medicine: The Belgian Contribution,” Medicine, Science and the Law, Vol. 4, 1964, pp. 155–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, F. and Gallet, G., “Homicide by Blows dealt to the Head by Means of an Ax and Identification of the Weapon,” International Criminal Police Review, Vol. 10, 1947, pp. 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S.S., An Introduction to Modern Criminal Investigation, with Basic Laboratory Techniques, Thomas, Springfield, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R.A., “The Quandary of “Qualified Opinions,” Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, Vol. 13, 1980, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stoney, D.A. and Thornton, J.I., “A Critical Analysis of Quantitative Fingerprint Individuality Models,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 31, 1986, pp. 1187–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowger, J.F., Friction Ridge Skin: Comparison and Identification of Fingerprints, Elsevier, New York, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser-Nielsen, S., Personal Identification by Means of the Teeth, John Wright and Sons, Bristol, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Dailey, J.C., “Identification Strength Scale (Letter to the Editor).” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 32, 1987, pp. 317–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, A.A., “Forensic Dentistry,” Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 93, 1976, pp. 991–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullision, A.D., “Identification by Probabilities and Trial by Arithmetic (A Lesson for Beginners in how to be Wrong with Greater Precision).” Houston Law Review, Vol. 6, 1969, pp. 471–518.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S.B., “Cryptic Tales,” Equinox, Vol. 34, 1987, pp. 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, J. and Skinner, M., “Epidemiological Statistics of Dental Lesions at Reach Dental Clinic, Vancouver,” 1987, unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.V. and Solheim, T., “Power of Various Dental Features in Identification (Abstract),” paper presented at 10th meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, Oxford, Journal of the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 24, 1984, p. 450.
   Google Scholar
• Rawson, R.D., Ommen, R.K., Kinard, G., Johnson, J. and Yfantis, A., “Statistical Evidence for the Individuality of the Human Dentition,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 29, 1984, pp. 245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, H.L., “Methods of Investigation in the Identification of Human Remains,” 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Culbert, W.L. and Law, F.M., “Identification by Comparison of Roentgenograms,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 88, 1927, pp. 1634–1636.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, I., Woesner, M.E., Ferguson, R.A. and Noguchi, T.T., “A New Application of Forensic Radiology: Identification of Deceased from a Single Clavicle,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 115, 1972, pp. 619–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgman, W.M., The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Thomas, Springfied, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Hillsdon-Smith, J. “Advanced Identification Techniques,” in Forensic Pathology and the Identification Officer, Ministry of Solicitor General, Toronto, 1979, pp. 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Iscan, M.Y., “Concepts in Teaching Forensic Anthropology,” Medical Anthropology Newsletter, Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Iscan, M.Y., “Forensic Anthropology and Forensic Pathology: A Comparison,” Paper presented at Second National Conference on Identifying Human Remains, 1982, Boca Raton.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.D., Essentials of Forensic Anthropology, Especially as Developed in the United States, Thomas, Springfield, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth, B. and Wilder, H.H., Personal Identification Methods for the Identification of Individuals—Living or Dead, T.G. Cooke, Chicago, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.D., “History of Physical Anthropology,” in Wallace, A.F.C. (Ed.), Perspectives on Anthropology 1976, Special Publication No. 10, American Anthropological Association, Washington, 1977, pp. 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Munster, D.F., “Greeting from the Support Services,” in Stewart, T.D., (Ed.) Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, Smithsonian, Washington, 1970, pp. 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Krogman, W.M., “A Guide to the Identification of Human Skeletal Material,” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Vol. 8, 1939, pp. 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.D., (Ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, Smithsonian, Washington, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Neep, W.A., “Procedures used by the U.S. Army to Ensure Proper Identification of the Vietnam War Dead and their Acceptance by the Next-of Kin,” in Stewart, T.D. (Ed.) Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, Smithsonian, Washington, 1970, pp. 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Krogman, W.M. and Iscan, M.Y., The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine (Second Edition), Thomas, Springfield, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• El-Najjar, M.Y. and McWilliams, K.R., Forensic Anthropology. The Structure, Morphology and Variation of Human Bone and Dentition, Thomas, Springfield, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Kerley, E.R., “Special Observations in Skeletal Identification,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 17, 1972, pp. 349–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerley, E.R., “Forensic Anthropology,” in Wecht, C.H. (Ed.) Legal Medicine Annual, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1973, pp. 161–198.
   Google Scholar
• Kerley, E.R., “Recent Developments in Forensic Anthropology,” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 21, 1978, pp. 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, W.M., “Developments in the Identification of Human Skeletal Material (1968–1978),” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 51, 1979, pp. 555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C.C., “Forensic Anthropology,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 11, 1982, pp. 97–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvin, S., Grunbaum, B.W. and Myhre, B.A., “The Probability of Exclusion or Likelihood of Guilt of an Accused: Paternity,” Journal on the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 23., 1983a, pp. 19–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selvin, S., Grunbaum, B.W. and Myhre, B.A., “The Probability of Non-discrimination or Likelihood of Guilt of an Accused: Criminal Identification,” Journal of the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 23., 1983b, pp. 27–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sen, A., “A Mathematical Perspective on the Formation of Expert Opinion (Abstract),” paper presented at the 10th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, Oxford, Journal of the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 24, 1984, pp. 420–421.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R.C., Statistics for Biologists (Second Edition), Cambridge University Press, London, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Klugh, H.E., Statistics: The Essentials for Research (Second edition), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R.V., “On Identification by Probability,” Journal of the Forensic Science Society, Vol. 26, 1986, pp. 197–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StatsCanada, Population. Ethnic Origin (1981), Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M.F., Syed, A. Farrel, J. & Borden, J.H., Case report in forensic anthropology: “Animal and Insect Factors in Decomposition of Homicide Victim,” Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 1988; 21, 71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston, R., Evidence, Proof and Probability, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, L.H., “Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process,” in Peterson, J.L. (Ed.), Forensic Science: Scientific Investigation in Criminal Justice, AMS Press, New York, 1975, pp. 211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, C.R. and Kirk, P.L., “The Use of Statistics in Criminalistics,” in Peterson, J.L. (Ed.), Forensic Science: Scientific Investigation in Criminal Justice, AMS Press, New York, 1975, pp. 178–199?
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D., “A Survey of Bone Fractures,” 1982, unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver Sun Newspaper, May 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Benciolini, P., Biasolini, M., Cortivo, P. and Caenazzo, L., “Problems in Probability of Paternity Interpretation,” Forensic Science International, Vol. 29, 1985, pp. 199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskin, L.H. and Gorlin, R.J., “Agenesis and Peg-shaped Permanent Maxillary Lateral Incisors,” Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 42, 1963, 1476–1479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolf, G.M., “Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Genetic Study,” American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 23, 1971, pp. 289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, H.J., “What is reasonable doubt? A Forensic Scientist Looks at the Law,” in Peterson, J.L. (Ed.), Forensic Science: Scientific Investigation in Criminal Justice, AMS Press, New York, 1975, pp. 200–210.
   Google Scholar