La DÉCision Judiciaire ou Administrative Face Aux Éléments de Preuve Physique et le TÉMoignage D'expert

RÉFÉRENCES

• Pour des résumés relatifs à la preuve criminelle: R. c. Audy (no. 2) (1977) 34 C.C.C. 231(C.A.O.). Fisher c. R. (1961)R.C.S. 535.
   Google Scholar
• Code de procédure civile du Québec, L, R.Q. c. C-25, a. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbrand C. R. (1967) R.C.S. 14. Fisher c. R. op. cité. R. c. Lupien (1970) R.C.S. 263.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz J.R. Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford University Press, New-York, 1974; 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Par exemple: En Angleterre: Folkes v. Chadd, 3 Dougl. 157, 159–60, 99 Eng. Rep. 589, 599(K.B. 1782). Revett v. Braham, 4 Term. Rep. 497(1792). Aux États-Unis: Moody v. Rowell, 34 Mass. (17 Pich.) 490(1836). Au Canada: Fisher c. R., op. cité. Pitre c. R. (1932) 59 C.C.C. 148.
   Google Scholar
• Exemple: art. 402, 421, C.p.c.
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher vs. Smith (1931) 4 D.L.R. 102, p. 116.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher C. R. op. cité, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Code des professions, L.R.Q. c. C-26 (1978), a. 26. Code de déontologie des chimistes, L.R.Q., c. C-15, (1977) a. 1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Preeper and Doyle v. R. (1888) 15 R.C.S. 401.
   Google Scholar
• R. c. Prairie-Schooner News et al. (1971) 1 C.C.C. (2d) 251, p. 266(C.A.O.).
   Google Scholar
• R. c. Salvador, (1981) 59 C.C.C. (2d) 521. (C.A.N.E.).
   Google Scholar
• R. c. Bunnis (1965) 44 C.R. 262, p. 264.
   Google Scholar
• Code des professions, op, cité, art. 32, 36 et 37.
   Google Scholar
• La Société canadienne des sciences judiciaires/Canadian Society of Forensic Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Forensic Toxicologists (S.O.F.T.). American Board of Criminalists (A.B.C.). American Board of Forensic Document Examiners (A.B.F.D.E.).
   Google Scholar
• Frankel M.S. Ethics and the Forensic Sciences: Professional Autonomy in the Criminal Justice System. J. Forensic Sci. 1989; Vol. 34, n° 3, 766.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel M.S. op. cité, 765.
   Google Scholar
• Saks M.S. Prevalence and Impact of Ethical Problems in Forensic Science, J. Forensic Sci., 1989; Vol. 34, No. 3, 777–793.
   Google Scholar
• Risinger D.M. et al. The Lessons of Handwriting Identification U. of Penn., Law Review, January 1989; Vol. 137, No. 3, 730–792.
   Google Scholar
• Jonakait R.N. Forensic Science: The Need for Regulation, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Spring 1991; Vol. 4, 109–191.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson F. et al. Crime Laboratory Proficiency Testing Research Program, vol. 26(1978) L.E.A.A. (Ed. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration).
   Google Scholar
• Frankel M.S. op. cité.
   Google Scholar
• Jonakait R.N. op. cité, 111.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson F. et al.., op. cité, p. 238. “Erronées” dans le sens direct ou indirect (ex. bonnes conclusions/mauvaises raisons, résultats équivoques sans raisons, résultats inconcluants non-fondés par le travail analytique ou fondé sur des méthodes impropres).
   Google Scholar
• Idem, p, 239.
   Google Scholar
• Idem, p, 257(Table 89).
   Google Scholar
• Ex. American Board of Criminalistics (A.B.C.), adresse: President, A.B.C., 1010, Commonwealth Av., Boston, Massachussets, 02215 U.S.A. American Board of Forensic Documents, adresse: 7887 San Felipe, Suite 122, Houston, Texas, 77063 U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• ”Forum”, S.C.S.J., supplément numéro 19, décembre 1993. Lettre, D.C. Purdy. Frye vs. U.S. 293 F. 1013(D.C. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Frye vs. U.S. 293 F. 1013(D.C. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Giannelli P.C. LL.M., Evidentiary and Procedural Rules Governing Expert Testimony, J. of Forensic Sci., May 1989; Vol. 34, no 3, 730–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley K. Vocational Qualifications in Forensic Sciences, Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1994; Vol. 34, No. 1, U.K., 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Michel L. Evaluation of Handwriting Analysis According to New Practices in Courts of Law, Mannheimer Hefte-Für Schrift-Vegleichung, 1988; vol. 14, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Michel L. Jurisprudence Involving Handwriting Analysis. Mannheimer Hefte-Für Schrift-Vegleichung, 1991; vol. 17,58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper & Row Ed., 1968, New-York, 215–216.
   Google Scholar
• Ex. American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Code of Ethics and Conducts, Article II, AAFS By-Laws.
   Google Scholar