Evaluation of the performance of erasable marker pen ink for the development of indentations on documents upon surface charging by electrostatic detection device

References

• Hilton O. Scientific examination of questioned documents. New York (NY): Elsevier; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Huber RA, Headrick AM. Handwriting identification: facts and fundamentals. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen D, Foster D, Morantz D. The use of electrostatic imaging in the detection of indented impressions. Forensic Sci Int. 1980;15(1):53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster D, Morantz D. An electrostatic imaging technique for the detection of indented impressions in documents. Forensic Sci Int. 1979;13:51–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DS. The electrostatic detection apparatus (ESDA) and its effects on latent prints on paper. J Forensic Sci. 1988;33(2):357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier PE. Application of experimental variables to the use of the electrostatic detection apparatus. J Forensic Sci. 1983;28(4):901–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolliver DK. The electrostatic detection apparatus (ESDA): is it really non-destructive to documents? Forensic Sci Int. 1990;44(1):7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koeijer JA, Berger CE, Glas W, et al. Gelatine lifting, a novel technique for the examination of indented writing. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(4):908–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daéid NN, Whitehead L, Allen M . Examining the effects of paper type, pen type, writing pressure and angle of intersection on white and dark dominance in ESDA impressions of sequenced strokes—an application of the likelihood ratio. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;181(1–3):32–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff B, Offa B, Turner IJ. Indentation recovery threshold using the Electrostatic Detection Apparatus®. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2017;50(1):23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblett MG, James EL. Optimum conditions for examination of documents using an electrostatic detection apparatus (ESDA) device to visualize indented writings. J Forensic Sci. 1983;28(3):697–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riebeling IJ, Kobus HJ. Some parameters affecting the quality of ESDA results. J Forensic Sci. 1994;39(1):15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanxiang L, Xiaoling C. A study of the principle of the electrostatic imaging technique. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1988;28(4):237–242.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse M, Brennan J. Importance of absolute humidity in the operation of the electrostatic detection apparatus. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;83(2):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaraskavitch L, Graydon M, Tanaka T, et al. Controlled electrostatic methodology for imaging indentations in documents. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;177(2–3):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton O. Pencil erasures. Detection and decipherment. J Crim Law Criminol. 1963;54(3):381–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells A. A novel method for revealing unintended handwriting impressions on underlying layers of paper. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1976;16(3):201–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levinson J. Questioned documents: a lawyer’s handbook. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksow DL, Curfman HW. Decipherment of indented impressions with dry erase markers. California: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Police. Wellington Central Police Station Document Examination Laboratory Test Method – Dry erase marker technique for indentation.
   Google Scholar
• Gage J. Color and meaning: art, science, and symbolism. Los Angeles (CA): University of California Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer HW. Starch in the paper industry. In: James BeMiller and Roy Whistler, editors, Starch. London: Academic Press; 2009. p. 657–713.
   Google Scholar
• Allen MJ. Foundations of forensic document analysis: theory and practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seward GH. Model for electrostatic imaging of forensic evidence via discharge through Mylar-paper path. J Appl Phys. 1998;83(3):1450–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seward GH. Practical implications of charge transport model for Electrostatic Detection Apparatus (ESDA). J Forensic Sci. 1999; 44(4):832–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S, Klein A, Chaikovsky A. Deciphering indented impressions on plastic. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48(4):869–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammino J, Jossel F. Developer compositions comprising toner and carrier. USA: Google Patents; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Fushida A. Dry developer of toner for electrophotography. KONA. 1986;4(0):104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Daéid NN, Hayes K, Allen M . Investigations into factors affecting the cascade developer used in ESDA–a review. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;181(1–3):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar