211
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Morphological variation in the mandible of white males and females from the East Texas region for potential applications for skeletal identification

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 181-205 | Received 27 Sep 2021, Accepted 14 Feb 2022, Published online: 06 Apr 2022

References

  • Moore-Jansen. Morphological Investigation and Human Identification of the Mandible. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, Dusseldorf, Germany; 1993.
  • G V, Gowri S R M, J A. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2671–2673.
  • Pietrusewsky M. Metric analysis of skeletal remains: methods and applications. In: Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2000. p. 375–415.
  • Janaway R, Dirkmaat DC (Ed.). A companion to forensic anthropology. Chromatographia. 2015;78:1509–1510.
  • Langley NR, Tersigni-Tarrant MTA. Forensic anthropology: a comprehensive introduction. New York: CRC Press; 2016.
  • Moore MK. Chapter 4 – Sex estimation and assessment. In: DiGangi EA, Moore MK, editors. Research methods in human skeletal biology. Oxford, UK: Academic Press; 2013. p. 91–116.
  • Moore-Jansen PH, Jantz RL, Ousley SD. Data collection procedures for forensic skeletal material. Knoxville, TE: Forensic Anthropology Center, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Tennessee; 1994.
  • Byers SN. Introduction to forensic anthropology. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 189.
  • Acsádi G, Nemeskéri J. History of human life span and mortality. Budapest, Akademiai Kiado. 1970:113–135.
  • Langley NR, Dudzik B, Cloutier A. A decision tree for nonmetric sex assessment from the skull. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63(1):31–37.
  • Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, et al. Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(4):869–875.
  • Lewis CJ, Garvin HM. Reliability of the walker cranial nonmetric method and implications for sex estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61(3):743–751.
  • Loth SR, Henneberg M. Mandibular ramus flexure: A new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996;99(3):473–485.
  • Hill CA. Technical note: evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;111(4):573–577.
  • Deana NF, Alves N. Nonmetrical sexual dimorphism in mandibles of Brazilian individuals. Biomedical Research (India). 2017;28:4233–4238.
  • Hu KS, Koh KS, Han SH, et al. Sex determination using nonmetric characteristics of the mandible in Koreans*. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51(6):1376–1382.
  • White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA. Chapter 4 - Skull: Cranium and mandible. In: White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA, editor. Human osteology. 3rd ed. San Diego, CAL: Academic Press; 2012. p. 43–100.
  • Isaac B, Holla SJ. Variations in the shape of the coronoid process in the adult human mandible. J Anat Soc India. 2001;50(2):137–139.
  • Prajapati VP, Malukar O, Nagar SK. Variations in the morphological appearance of the coronoid process of human mandible. Nat J Med Res. 2011;1(2):64–66.
  • Subbaramaiah DM, & Bajpe R, Jagannatha SR, et al. A study of various forms of mandibular coronoid process in determination of sex. Ind J Clin Anat Phys. 2015;2(4):199–203.
  • Pradhan S, & Bara D, Patra S, et al. Anatomical study of various shapes of mandibular coronoid process in relation to gender & age. J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13:9–14.
  • Berg GE. Biological affinity and sex determination using morphometric and morphoscopic variables from the human mandible [dissertation]. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee; 2008.
  • Kumar MP, Lokanadham S. Sex determination and morphometric parameters of human mandible. Int J Res Med Sci. 2013;1(2):93–96.
  • Pillai T. J., Devi, T.S., & Devi, C.L. 2014 Studies on Human Mandibles. IOSR-J Dent Med Sci, 13(1)
  • R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Buikstra, J. E., & Ubelaker, D. 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville, Arkansas: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44.
  • Varela LM, Moss BH, Moore-Jansen PH. A method for characterizing alveolar resorption for osteological research. [Unpublished manuscript]. Anthropology Department, Wichita State University; 2020.
  • Giles E. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1964;22(2):129–135.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.