Mapping the Digital Terrain: Towards Indigenous Geographic Information and Spatial Data Quality Indicators for Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Land-Use Data Collection

References

• Agrawal, A. (1995). ‘Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge’, Development and Change, 26, pp. 413–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arctic Institute of North America. (1997). Dene Tha’: Traditional Land Use and Occupancy Study. The Arctic Institute of North America: Calgary, AB. National Environmental Law Conference, The Canadian Bar Association, March 2000, Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, T. R. (1977). Northern Frontier Northern Homeland: The Report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, Supply and Services, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office. (2013). Guidelines for the Selection of Valued Components and Assessment of Potential Effects, Environmental Assessment Office, Victoria, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, H. (1981). Maps and Dreams: Indians and the British Columbia Frontier, Douglas and McIntyre, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2005). ‘Research, respect and responsibility: A critical review of the Tri-Council Policy Statement in Aboriginal community-based research’, Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 3(2), pp. 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Calder v. British Columbia (Attorney General). (1973). SCR 313.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. (2015). Operational Policy Statement – Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects Under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Candler, C., and the Firelight Group Research Cooperative. (2011). Mikisew Cree First Nation Indigenous Knowledge and Use Report and Assessment for Shell Canada’s Proposed Jackpine Mine Expansion, Pierre River Mine, and Redclay Compensation Lake, Mikisew Cree First Nation Government and Industry Relations, Fort Chipewyan, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Caquard, S. (2013). ‘Cartography I: Mapping Narrative Cartography’, Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), pp. 135–144. doi: 10.1177/0309132511423796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caquard, S., Pyne, S., Igloliorte, H., Mierins, K., Hayes, A. and Taylor, D. R. F. (2009). ‘A “living” atlas for geospatial storytelling: The cybercartographic atlas of Indigenous perspectives and knowledge of the Great Lakes Region’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44(2), pp. 83–100. doi: 10.3138/carto.44.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, M., Lamb, Z. and Threlkeld, B. (2005). ‘Mapping Indigenous lands’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, pp. 619–638. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dei, G. (1993). ‘Sustainable development in the African context: Revisiting some theoretical and methodological issues’, African Development, 18(2), pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. (1997). 3 SCR 1010.
   Google Scholar
• Devillers, R., Stein, A., Bédard, Y., Chrisman, Fisher P. and Shi, W. (2010). ‘Thirty years of research on spatial data quality: Achievements, failures, and opportunities’, Transactions in GIS, 14(4), pp. 387–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006). ‘Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions’, Transactions in GIS, 10, pp. 693–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x
   Google Scholar
• Engler, N. J., Scassa, T. and Taylor, D. R. F. (2013). ‘Mapping traditional knowledge: Digital cartography in the Canadian north’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 48, pp. 189–199. doi: 10.3138/carto.48.3.1685
   Google Scholar
• Ermine, W., Sinclair, R. and Bonnie, J. (2004). The Ethics of Research Involving Indigenous Peoples. Report of the Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Indigenous Peoples’, Health Research Centre, Saskatoon, SK.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Krisnawati, S. and Hershock, P. (2005). Mapping Communities: Ethics, Values, Practice, East-West Center, Honolulu.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (1976). Inuit Land Use and Occupancy Project: A Report, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2011). ‘Looking back – and looking ahead – 35 years after the Inuit land use and occupancy project’, Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 55, pp. 20–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2010.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guptill, S. and Morrison, J. (1995). Elements of Spatial Data Quality, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. and Weiner, D. (1998). ‘Empowerment, marginalization, and “community-integrated” GIS’, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25, pp. 67–76. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594580
   Google Scholar
• Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests). (2004). 3 SCR 511, 2004 SCC 73.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. and Schroeder, R. (2002). ‘Dilemmas of counter-mapping community resources in Tanzania’, Development and Change, 33, pp. 79–100. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. T., Louis, R. P. and Pramono, A. H. (2006). ‘Facing the future: Encouraging critical cartographic literacies in Indigenous communities’, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4, pp. 80–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, A. and Manseau, M. (2008). ‘Representing traditional knowledge: Resource management and Inuit knowledge of barren-ground caribou’, Society & Natural Resources, 21, pp. 404–418. doi: 10.1080/08941920801898341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyem, P. (2004). ‘Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: the search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), pp. 37–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C. (2006). ‘The future’s past: Politics of time and territory among Dakelh first nations in British Columbia’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88, pp. 311–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00224.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K. and Minang, P. A. (2005). ‘Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: Claiming community forests in Cameroon’, Geographical Journal, 171, pp. 340–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreary, T. A. and Lamb, V. (2014). ‘A political ecology of sovereignty in practice and on the map: The technicalities of law, participatory mapping, and environmental governance’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 27, pp. 595–619. doi: 10.1017/S0922156514000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreary, T. A. and Milligan, R. A. (2014). ‘Pipelines, permits, and protests: Carrier Sekani encounters with the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project’, Cultural Geographies, 21, pp. 115–129. doi: 10.1177/1474474013482807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranaghan, M. (1993). ‘A cartographic view of spatial data quality’, Cartographica, 30, pp. 8–19. doi: 10.3138/310V-0067-7570-6566
   Google Scholar
• McLain, R., Poe, M., Biedenweg, K., Cerveny, L., Besser, D. and Blahna, D. (2013). ‘Making sense of human ecology mapping: An overview of approaches to integrating socio-spatial data into environmental planning’, Human Ecology, 41, pp. 651–665. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9573-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies, C. (2001). ‘Reflections on research with, for, and among Indigenous peoples’, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(1), pp. 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage). (2005). 3 SCR 388, 2005 SCC 69.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. (1999). ‘The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration of knowledge”’, Arctic Anthropology, 36(1–2), pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natcher, D. C. (2001). ‘Land use research and the duty to consult: A misrepresentation of the Aboriginal landscape’, Land Use Policy, 18, pp. 113–122. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00011-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M. W. and Louis, R. P. (2008). ‘Mapping Indigenous depth of place’, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 32, pp. 107–126. doi: 10.17953/aicr.32.3.n7g22w816486567j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. (1995). ‘Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Antipode, 27, pp. 383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (2004). A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping, and the Geo-coded World, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., Garvin, T. and Hodgson, G. (1994). Mapping How We Use Our Land, The Arctic Institute of North America, Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. (2007). ‘Two-dimensional maps in multi-dimensional worlds: A case of community-based mapping in Northern Thailand’, Geoforum, 38, pp. 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. (2009). ‘The challenges of mapping complex Indigenous spatiality: From abstract space to dwelling space’, Cultural Geographies, 16, pp. 207–227. doi: 10.1177/1474474008101517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundstrom, R. A. (1995). ‘GIS, Indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity’, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22, pp. 45–57. doi: 10.1559/152304095782540564
   Google Scholar
• Ruttan, L. (2004). ‘Exploring ethical principles in the context of research relationships’, Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 2(1), pp. 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Scassa, T. Engler, N. J. and Taylor, D. R. F. (2013). ‘Legal issues in mapping traditional knowledge: Digital cartography in the Canadian north’, The Cartographic Journal, 52(1), pp. 41–50. doi: 10.1179/174327713X13847707305703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., Fisher, P. and Goodchild, M. F. (2002). Spatial Data Quality, Taylor and Francis, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sletto, B. (2009). ‘“We drew what we imagined”: Participatory mapping, performance, and the arts of landscape making’, Current Anthropology, 50, pp. 443–476. doi: 10.1086/593704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, Zed Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. (1998). ‘A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, pp. 463–495. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, A., Shi, W. and Bijker, W. (2008). Quality Aspects in Spatial Data Mining, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. G. (1996). ‘Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment’, Arctic, 49(3), pp. 278–291. doi: 10.14430/arctic1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, E. C. (2001). Towards Moral and Ethical Research in Collaboration with First Nations Communities. Masters thesis in Natural Resource Management. University of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director). (2004). 3 SCR 550, 2004 SCC 74.
   Google Scholar
• The First Nations Centre. (2007). Considerations and Templates for Ethical Research Practices, National Aboriginal Health Organization, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, B. (2009). ‘The paradox of boundaries in Coast Salish territories’, Cultural Geographies, 16, pp. 179–205. doi: 10.1177/1474474008101516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom, B. and Washbrook, K. (1997). ‘Co-management, Negotiation, Litigation: Questions of Power in Traditional Use Studies’, in Annual Meetings of the Society for Applied Anthropology, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, T. N. (2000). Chief Kerry’s Moose: A Guidebook to Land Use and Occupancy Mapping, Research Design, and Data Collection, Ecotrust Canada/UBCIC, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, T. N. (2009). Living Proof: The Essential Data-collection Guide for Indigenous Use-and-Occupancy Map Surveys, Ecotrust Canada/UBCIC, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble, J. (1977). ‘The Sojourner in the American Indian community: Methodological issues and concerns’, Journal of Social Issues, 33(4), pp. 159–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, P. J., Tough, F. J. and Galois, R. M. (1992). ‘Reclaiming the land: Aboriginal title, treaty rights and land claims in Canada’, Applied Geography, 12(2), pp. 109–132. doi: 10.1016/0143-6228(92)90002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J. and Bryan, J. (2009). ‘Cartography, territory, property: postcolonial reflections on Indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize’, Cultural Geographies, 16, pp. 153–178. doi: 10.1177/1474474008101515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, M. W. (1976). What the land provides. An examination of the Fort George subsistence economy and the possible consequences on it of the James Bay hydroelectric project, Grand Council of the Cree (of Quebec), Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Willow, A. J. (2013). ‘Doing sovereignty in native North America: Anishinaabe counter-mapping and the struggle for land-based self-determination’, Human Ecology, 41, pp. 871–884. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9593-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., Fortier, J. F., Greskiw, G., Hébert, M., Nadeau, S., Natcher, D., Smith, P., Théberge, D. and Trosper, R. (2010). Can Aboriginal land use and occupancy studies be applied effectively in forest management? A state of knowledge report. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, AB.
   Google Scholar