Powering Up: Revisiting Participatory GIS and Empowerment

References

• Atzmanstorfer, K., Resl, R., Eitzinger, A. and Izurieta, X. (2014). ‘The GeoCitizen-approach: Community-based spatial planning – an Ecuadorian case study’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(3), pp. 248–259. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2014.890546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. G. and Reed, P. (2009). ‘Public participation GIS: A new method for use in national forest planning’, Forest Science, 55(2), pp. 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Weber, D. (2013). ‘Using public participation GIS (PPGIS) on the Geoweb to monitor tourism development preferences’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(2), pp. 192–211. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2012.693501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R. and Turton, I. (2001). ‘Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems’, Environment and Planning B, 28, pp. 907–921. doi: 10.1068/b2751t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, M., Lamb, Z. and Threlkeld, B. (2005). ‘Mapping Indigenous lands’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, pp. 619–638. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., Corbett, J., Evans, M. and Gill, M. (2016). ‘Searching for social Justice in crowdsourced mapping’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1212673
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, L., Corbett, J. and Keller, P. (2014). Impact of Community-Based and Participatory Mapping, Institute for Studies and Innovation in Community-University Engagement, University of Victoria, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. M. (2013). ‘“I don’t come from anywhere”: Exploring the role of the Geoweb and volunteered geographic information in rediscovering a sense of place in a dispersed aboriginal community’, in Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, ed. by Sui, D., Elwood, S. and, Goodchild, M., pp. 223–241, Springer, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. M. and Keller, C. P. (2005). ‘An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS)’, Cartographica, 40(4), pp. 91–102. doi: 10.3138/J590-6354-P38V-4269
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. and Eade, D. (2010). Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, Practical Action Publishing, Bourton on Dunsmore.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. (2009). ‘Cartography: Maps 2.0.’, Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 91–100. doi: 10.1177/0309132508094074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. and Krygier, J. (2006). 'An introduction to critical cartography', ACME Journal, 4(1), pp. 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• David, A. and Howard, E. (2005). ‘Spring recolonization rate of monarch butterflies in eastern North America: New Estimates from citizen-science data’, Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 59, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, B. and Miley, K. K. (1992). Social Work: An Empowering Profession. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. E. (2007). ‘Participatory GIS – A people’s GIS?’ Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), pp. 616–637. doi: 10.1177/0309132507081493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2002). ‘GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment’, Environment and Planning A, 34(5), pp. 905–922. doi: 10.1068/a34117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2007). ‘Negotiating participatory ethics in the midst of institutional ethics’, ACME, 6(2), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. (1996). ‘Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice’, in Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability, ed. by Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J. and Wandersman, A., pp. 3–46, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development, Blackwell, Malden.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S. (2011). ‘Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in E-Government’, Public Administration Review, 71(3), pp. 425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. and Tobon, C. (2002). Usability Evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a User-Centered Design Approach. 1st Urban-and-Regional-Information-Systems-Association Public Participation GIS. Rutger University, New Brunswick, NJ, July 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. S. (1993). Mapping the Next Millennium: How Computer-driven Cartography is Revolutionizing the Face of Science, Vintage Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. and Weiner, D. (1998). ‘Empowerment, marginalization, and “community-integrated” GIS’, Cartography and Geographic Information, 25(2), pp. 67–76. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594580
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. (2009). ‘Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making’, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1956–1971. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M-P. (2002). ‘Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), pp. 645–661. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyem, P. A. K. (2004). ‘Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: The search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, pp. 37–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. (1993). The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. (2003). ‘Seeking good governance in participatory GIS: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning’, Habitat International, 27, pp. 549–573. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, M. and Minang, P. (2005). ‘Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: Claiming community forests in Cameroon’, The Geographical Journal, 171(4), pp. 340–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P. and Drew, C. (2002). ‘Data-gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16, pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/13658810110075987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., Tuthill, D. and Ramsey, K. (2006). ‘Collaborative water resource decision support: Results of a field experiment’, Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 96(4), pp. 699–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, N. J. (1995). ‘The hidden GIS technocracy’, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), pp. 78–83. doi: 10.1559/152304095782540609
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S. (1991). ‘A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again’, Environment and Planning A, 23, pp. 621–628. doi: 10.1068/a230621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S. (1992). ‘Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A reply’, Environment and Planning A, 24, pp. 463–466. doi: 10.1068/a240463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, R. J. (1991). ‘Empowerment: Purpose and practice principle in social work’, Social Work with Groups, 14(2), pp. 7–21. doi: 10.1300/J009v14n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. (1995). ‘Whose woods are these? Territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Antipode, 274, pp. 383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (1995). ‘Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy’, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems ed. by Pickles, J., pp. 1–30, Guildford Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. (1987). ‘Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), pp. 121–148. doi: 10.1007/BF00919275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristock, J. L. and Pennell, J. (1996). Community Research as Empowerment: Feminist Links, Postmodern Interruptions, Oxford University Press Canada, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, E. M. (1997). ‘A ladder of empowerment’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), pp. 31–44. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9701700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras, Oxfam, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Scheyvens, R. (1999). ‘Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities’, Tourism Management, 20(2), pp. 245–249. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00069-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P. (1996). ‘Report on public participation GIS workshop’, in GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space and Environment Are Represented in GIS. ed. by Harris, T. and Weiner, D. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA) Technical Report 96e97, Scientific Report for Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting, South Haven, MN. March 2e5, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. (1995). ‘GIS and society: Towards a research agenda’, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), pp. 5–16. doi: 10.1559/152304095782540555
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2000). ‘Conforming (to) the opposition: The social construction of geographical information systems in social movements’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(8), pp. 775–793. doi: 10.1080/136588100750022787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2003). ‘Public participation geographic information system across borders’, Professional Geographer, 47(1), pp. 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2006). ‘Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), pp. 491–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2012). ‘Participatory geospatial Web 2.0: Theory meets practice’, in Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Columbus, OH, Sep 18–21. Retrieved http://www.giscience.org/past/2012/proceedings/abstracts/giscience2012_paper_176.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1999). ‘Constructing neighborhoods from the bottom up: The case for resident-generated GIS’, Environment and Planning B, 26, pp. 533–554. doi: 10.1068/b260533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. and Overton, M. (1991). ‘Further thoughts on geography and GIS’, Environment and Planning A, 23, pp. 1087–1090. doi: 10.1068/a231087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. and Overton, M. (1992). ‘Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A reply’, Environment and Planning A, 24, pp. 463–466. doi: 10.1068/a240463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. (1992). ‘Non-governmental organizations and the limits to empowerment’, Development Policy and Public Action, 117, pp. 146.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, B.-W., Lu, D.-J., Chung, M.-K. and Lien, M.-C. (2013). ‘Evaluation of PPGIS empowerment – a case study of Meinong yellow butterfly valley in Taiwan’, Journal of Environmental Management, 116, pp. 204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, D. and Harris, T. (2003). ‘Community-integrated GIS for land reform in South Africa’, URISA Journal, 15(2), pp. 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. and Fels, J. (1992). The Power of Maps, Guilford Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. C. and Gilmore, M. P. (2013). ‘The spatial politics of affect and emotion in participatory GIS’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), pp. 808–823. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.707596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. C. and Gilmore, M. P. (2014). ‘Subaltern empowerment in the Geoweb: Tensions between publicity and privacy’, Antipode, 46(2), pp. 574–591. doi: 10.1111/anti.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar