Experiments to Distribute and Parallelize Map Generalization Processes

References

• Anders, K.-H. (2003). ‘ A hierarchical graph clustering approach to find groups of objects’, in Proceedings of 5th ICA Workshop on Progress in Automated Map Generalization. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Basaraner, M. and Selcuk, M. (2008). ‘A structure recognition technique in contextual generalisation of buildings and built-up areas’, The Cartographic Journal, 45 (4), pp. 274–285. doi: 10.1179/174327708X347773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brédif, M., Vallet, B. and Ferrand, B. (2015). ‘Distributed dimensionality-based rendering of lidar point clouds’, in International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (GeoBigData). XL-3/W5, Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Briat, M.-O., Monnot, J.-L., Punt, E. M. (2011). ‘Scalability of contextual generalization processing using partitioning and parallelisation’, in Proceedings of 14th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, B., Brasebin, M., Buard, E., Grosso, E., Mustière, S. and Perret, J. (2012). ‘GeOxygene: built on top of the expertness of the french NMA to host and share advanced GI science research results’, in Geospatial Free and Open Source Software in the 21st Century, ed. by Bocher, E. and Neteler, M., pp. 21–33, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, G. L., Jones, C. B. and Furse, E. (1995). ‘Holistic generalization of large-scale cartographic data’, in GIS and Generalisation: Methodology and Practice, ed. by Müller, J.-C., Lagrange, J.-P. and Weibel, R., pp. 106–119, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, D. and Neun, M. (2006). ‘Automated sequencing of generalisation services based on collaborative filtering’, in Geographic Information Science – 4th International Conference GIScience, ed. by Raubal, M., Miller, H. J., Frank, A. U., Goodchild, M. F. IFGI prints, pp. 41–46, Münster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, O. Z. and Mackaness, W. A. (2008). ‘Partitioning techniques to make manageable the generalisation of national spatial datasets’, in ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation. Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, O. Z. and Mackaness, W. A. (2010). ‘DTM generalisation: Handling large volumes of data for Multi-Scale mapping’, The Cartographic Journal, 47 (4), pp. 360–370. doi: 10.1179/000870410X12911342853948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, D. H. and Peucker, T. K. (1973). ‘Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 10 (2), pp. 112–122. doi: 10.3138/FM57-6770-U75U-7727
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, T., Stoter, J. and Kraak, M.-J. (2010). ‘Challenges for automated generalisation at European mapping agencies: A qualitative and quantitative analysis’, The Cartographic Journal, 47 (1), pp. 41–54. doi: 10.1179/000870409X12525737905123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffuri, J. (2012). ‘Toward web mapping with vector data’, in Geographic Information Science, ed. by Xiao, N., Kwan, M.-P., Goodchild, M. and Shekhar, S., pp. 87–101, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Lokhat, I. and Touya, G. (2016). ‘Enhancing building footprints with squaring operations’, Journal of Spatial Information Science, 13, pp. 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Regnauld, N. (2014). ‘1Generalise: 1Spatial’s new automatic generalisation platform’, in Proceedings of 17th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Regnauld, N., Touya, G., Gould, N. and Foerster, T. (2014). ‘Process modelling, web services and geoprocessing’, in Abstracting Geographic Information in a Data Rich World, ed. by Burghardt, D., Duchêne, C. and Mackaness, W., pp. 198–225, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, J., Gaffuri, J. and Duchêne, C. (2010). ‘Capitalisation problem in research – example of a new platform for generalisation: CartAGen’, in Proceedings of 11th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation. Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Ruas, A. and Plazanet, C. (1996). ‘Strategies for automated generalization’, in 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Delft, Netherlands, pp. 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Sester, M., Jokar Arsanjani, J., Klammer, R., Burghardt, D. and Haunert, J.-H. (2014). ‘Integrating and generalising volunteered geographic information’, in Abstracting Geographic Information in a Data Rich World, ed. by Burghardt, D., Duchêne, C. and Mackaness, W., pp. 119–155, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislawski, L. V., Falgout, J. and Buttenfield, B. P. (2015). ‘Automated extraction of natural drainage density patterns for the conterminous United States through High-Performance computing’, The Cartographic Journal, 52 (2), pp. 185–192. doi: 10.1080/00087041.2015.1119466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoter, J., van Smaalen, J., Bakker, N. and Hardy, P. (2009). ‘Specifying map requirements for automated generalization of topographic data’, The Cartographic Journal, 46 (3), pp. 214–227. doi: 10.1179/174327709X446637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann, F., Warneke, H., Sester, M. and Lipeck, U. (2011). ‘A scalable approach for generalization of land cover data’, in Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World, ed. by Geertman, S., Reinhardt, W. and Toppen, F., pp. 399–420, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann, F., Werder, S., Globig, T. and Sester, M. (2013). ‘Investigations into partitioning of generalization processes in a distributed processing framework’, in Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference, ed. by Buchroithner, M. F., Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Touya, G. (2010). ‘Relevant space partitioning for collaborative generalisation’, in Proceedings of 12th ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation. Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Visvalingam, M. and Whelan, J. C. (2016). ‘Implications of weighting metrics for line generalization with Visvalingam’s algorithm’, The Cartographic Journal, 53 (3), pp. 253–267. doi: 10.1080/00087041.2016.1149906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvalingam, M. and Whyatt, J. D. (1993). ‘Line generalisation by repeated elimination of points’, The Cartographic Journal, 30 (1), pp. 46–51. doi: 10.1179/caj.1993.30.1.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar