REFERENCES

• Bennet M.D. et Smith J.B, 1971.—The 4C nuclear DNA content of several Hordeum genotypes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol, 13: 607–611.
   Google Scholar
• Brewbaker J.L. et Emery G.C., 1962.—Pollen radiobotany. Radiat. Botany, 1: 101–154.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant T.R, 1973.—DNA synthesis and cell division in germinating Onion: III. Variation in apparent Feulgen—DNA content with nuclear area change. IV. Constancy of 2C (G1) nuclear DNA in a differenciated system. Caryologia, 26: 297–308, 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron I.L. et Prescott D.M., 1961.—Relations between cell growth and cell division. V. Cell and macronuclear volumes of Tetrahymena pyriformis HSM during the cell life cycle. Exp. Cell Res, 23: 354–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clowes F.A.L, 1965.—The duration of the G, phase of the mitotic cycle and its relation to radiosensitivity. New Phytol, 64: 355–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devreux M. et Scarascia-Mugnozza G.T, 1964.—Effects of gamma radiation of the gametes, zygote and proembryo in Nicotiana tabacum. Rad. Bot, 4: 373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Du Praw E.J, 1970.—«DNA and chromosomes ». 340 pp. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. (Molecular and Cellular Biology Series).
   Google Scholar
• Dutt M.K, 1968.—Increase in the amount of DNA-Feulgen in Mammalian tissue by Schiff reagents at less acid pH. Experientia, 24: 615–616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans G.M. et Rees H, 1971.—Duration of mitotic cycle in dicotyledons and monocotyledons. Nature 233, 5318: 350–351.
   Google Scholar
• Itikawa O. et Ogura Y., 1954.—The Feulgen reaction after hydrolysis at room temperature. Stain Technol, 29: 13–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Leish J., 1963.—Quantitative relationships between deoxyribonucleic and ribonucleic acid in isolated plant nuclei. Proc. R. Soc., Ser. B., 158: 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Leish J. et Sunderland N., 1961.—Measurements of DNA in higher plants by Feulgen photometry and chemical methods. Exp. Cell Res., 24: 527–540.
   Google Scholar
• Lyndon R.F., 1968.—The structure, function and development of the nucleus. In: Pridham « Plant cell organelles ». Proc. phytochem. group, symp. London, aprii 1967, 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari S., 1950.—An introduction to the embryology of Angiosperms. MC Graw Hill Books Cy Ltd, 453 p.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn M.L., 1958.—The two wavelength method of microspectrophotometry. II. A set of tables to facilitate the calculations. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 4: 415–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mericle L.W. et Mericle R.P., 1961.—Radiosensitivity of the developing plant embryo. Brookhaven Symp. Biol., 14: 262–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mericle L.W. et Mericle R.P., 1969.—Cytological consequences of proembryo irradiation. Radiation Botany, 9: 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mericle L.W. et Mericle R.P., 1970.—Nuclear DNA complement in young proembryos of Barley. Mutation Res., 10: 515–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miksche J.P., 1968.—Quantitative study of intraspecific variation of DNA per cell in Picea glauca and Pinus banksiana. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 10: 590–600.
   Google Scholar
• Mittwoch U., Lele K.P. et Webster W.S., 1965.—Relationship of Barr bodies, nuclear size and DNA value in cultured human cells. Nature, 205: 477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patau K., 1952.—Absorption microphotometry of irregular shaped objects. Chromosoma, 5: 341–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollister A.W., Swift H., Rasch E., 1969.—Microphotometry with visible light. Phys. Techn. in Biol. Res., IIIc: 201–251.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott D.M., 1955.—Relations between cell growth and cell division. I. Reduced weight, cell volume, protein content and nuclear volume of Amoeba proteus from division to division. Exp. Cell Res., 9: 328–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch H. et Woodard J.W., 1959.—Basic proteins of plant nuclei during normal and pathological cell growth. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 6: 263–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roels H., 1966.—«Metabolic » DNA: a cytochemical study. Int. Rev. Cytol., 19: 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreiber G., 1949.—Statistical and physiological studies on the interphasic growth of the nucleus. Biol. Bull., 97: 187–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seed J., 1962.—The synthesis of DNA and nuclear protein in normal and tumor strains. Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. B., 156: 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sisken J.E., 1959.—The synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins in the nuclei of Trade-scantia root-tips. Exp. Cell Res., 16: 602–614.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor J.H., 1961.—The growth of the nucleus. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie, 14: 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Vallade J. et Cornu A., 1973.—Etude cytophotométrique des stades zygotiques chez le Pétunia. CR Acad. Sci., sér. D, 276: 2793–2796.
   Google Scholar
• Van't Hof J. et Sparrow A.H., 1963.—A relationship between DNA content, nuclear volume and minimum cycle time. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US, 49: 897–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van't Hof J., 1965.—Relationships between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp. Cell Res., 39: 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodard J.W., 1956.—DNA in gametogenesis and embryogeny in Tradescantia. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 2: 765–776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodard J., Rasch E. et Swift H., 1961.—Nucleic acid and protein metabolism during the mitotic cycle in Vicia faba. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 9: 445–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zetterberg A., 1966.—Synthesis and accumulation of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins during interphase in Mouse fibroblasts in vitro. Exp. Cell Res., 42: 500–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar