Nuclear changes in cultured plant cells

REFERENCES

• Barbier M. and Dulieu H.L., 1980.—Effets génétiques observés sur des plantes de tabac regénerées à partir de cotyledons par culture in vitro. Ann. Amel. Pl., 30: 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P.T.H., Göbel E. and Lörz H., 1991.—RFLP analysis of Zea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants. Theor. Appi. Genet., 81: 227–232.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P.T.H., Kyozuka J., Sukekyo Y., Kimyra Y., Shimamoto K. and Lörz H., 1990.—Molecular changes in protoplast-derived plants. Mol. Gen. Genet., 223: 324–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cionini P.G., Bennici A. and D'amato F., 1978.—Nuclear cytology of callus induction and development in vitro. I. Callus from Vicia faba cotyledons. Protoplasma, 96: 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1985.—Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerates. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 3: 73–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1986.—Spontaneous mutations and somaclonal variation. In: «Nuclear techniques and in vitro cultures for plant improvement», pp. 3–10, IAEA, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1989.—Polyploidy in cell differentiation. Caryologia, 42: 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1990.—Somatic nuclear mutations in vivo and in vitro in higher plants. Caryologia, 43: 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., Bennici A., Cionini P.G., Baroncelli S. and Lupi M.C., 1980—Nuclear fragmentation followed by mitosis as mechanism for wide chromosome number variation in tissue cultures: its implications for plant regeneration. In: Sala F., Parisi B., Cella R. and Ciferri O. eds. «Plant cell cultures: results and perspectives», pp. 67–72, North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• D'amato F. and Hoffmann-Ostenhof O., 1956.—Metabolism and spontaneous mutations in plants. Adv. Genet., 8: 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis E.S., Brettel R.I.S., Peacock W.J., 1987.—A tissue culture induced Adh1 null mutant of maize results from a single base change. Mol. Gen. Genet., 210: 181–183.
   Google Scholar
• De Paepe R., Prat D. and Huguet T., 1983.—Effects of consecutive androgeneses on morphology and fertility in Nicotiana sylvestris. Can. J. Bot., 61: 2038–2046.
   Google Scholar
• Durante M., Geri C., Grisvard J., Guillé E., Parenti R. and Buiatti M., 1983.—Variation in DNA complexity in Nicotiana glauca tissue cultures. I. Pith tissue dedifferentiation in vitro. Protoplasma, 114: 114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasseas C. and Bowes B.G., 1980.—Ultrastructural observations on proliferating storage cells of mature cotyledons of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultured in vitro. Ann. Bot., 46: 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill B.S., Kam-Morgan L.N.W. and Shepard J.F., 1986.—Origin of chromosomal and phenotypic variation in potato protoclones. J. Hered., 77: 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould A.R., 1982.—Chromosome instability in plant tissue cultures studied with banding techniques. In: Fryiwara A. ed. «Plant tissue cultures», 1982, pp. 431–432, Maruzen Co., Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Karp A., and Bright S.W.J., 1985.—On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 2: 199–234.
   Google Scholar
• Landsmann J. and Urig H., 1985.—Somaclonal variation in Solanum tuberosum detected at the molecular level. Theor. Appl. Genet., 71: 500–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin P.I., Ryan S.A., Brettel R.I.S. and Scowcroft W.R., 1984.—Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor. Apl. Genet., 67: 443–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M. and Philips R.L., 1988.—The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 39: 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lörz H. and Scowcroft W.R., 1983.—Variability among plants and their progeny regenerated from protoplasts of Su/su heterozygotes of Nicotiana tabacum. Theor. Appl. Genet., 66: 67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller E., Brown P.T.H., Hartke S. and Lörz H., 1990.—DNA variation in tissue-culture-derived rice plants. Theor. Appl. Genet., 80: 673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagl W., 1988.—Genome changes induced by auxin-herbicides in seedlings and calli of Zea mays L. Env. Exp. Bot., 28: 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagl W. and Rücker W., 1976.—Effects of phytohormones on thermal denaturation profiles of Cymbidium DNA: indication of differential DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res., 3: 2033–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pätau K. and Das N.K., 1961.—The relation of DNA synthesis and mitosis in tobacco pith tissue cultured in vitro. Chromosoma, 11: 553–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pera F., 1970.—Mechanismen der Polyploidisierung und der somatischen Reduktion. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Peschke V.M. and Phillips R.L., 1991.—Activation of maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet., 81: 90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschke V.M., Phillips R.L. and Gengenback B.G., 1987.—Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science, 238: 804–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijinacker L.P. and Ferwerda M.A., 1987.—Karyotype variation in aminoethylcysteine resistant cell and callus cultures and regenerated plants of a dihaploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Cell Rep., 6: 385–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijinacker I.P., Sree Ramulu K., Dijkhuis P. and Ferwerda M.A., 1989.—Flow cytometric and karyological analysis of polysomaty and polyploidization during callus formation from leaf segments of various potato genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet., 77: 102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus J., 1954. Maize endosperm tissue grown in vitro. II. Morphology and cytology. Amer. J. Bot., 41: 833–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walbot V. and Cullis C.A., 1985.—Rapid genomic changes in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 36: 367–396.
   Google Scholar
• Williams M.E., Hepburn A.G. and Widholm J.M., 1991.—Somaclonal variation in a maize inbred line is not associated with changes in the number or locations of Ac-homologous sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet., 81: 273–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar